UPDATE, 2:29 PM: The Walt Disney Company has sent out a new statement about Imane Boudlal and the discrimination lawsuit she filed today against her former employer:
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts has a history of accommodating religious requests from cast members of all faiths. We presented Ms. Boudlal with multiple options to accommodate her religious beliefs, as well as offered her several roles that would have allowed her to wear her own hijab. Unfortunately, she rejected all of our efforts and has since refused to come to work. – Suzi Brown, Director, Media Relations and External Communication, Disneyland Resorts.
PREVIOUS, 10:25 AM: The American Civil Liberties Union today sued the Walt Disney Company for discrimination on behalf of a Muslim former Disneyland employee. The ACLU says that Imane Boudlal was fired in 2010 from her job at the theme park for wearing the hijab headscarf at work. The organization, with law firm Hadsell Stormer Richardson & Renick, filed the federal lawsuit today. In a 28-page complaint (read it here), the ACLU went after the Walt Disney Corporation on seven counts including discrimination and harassment in employment, and failure to remedy discrimination and harassment. The ACLU and Boudlal are asking for a jury trial as the plaintiff seeks applicable statutory, actual and punitive damages under each course of action as well as her legal fees. In the complaint, the ACLU is also requesting that the court order that all “Disney employees, supervisors, and managers regarding harassment and discrimination.” Ms. Boudlal says that besides the issues of the hijab, in beginning in the summer of 2008 she became the subject of insults based on her religion, national origin and skin color by fellow Disney workers and supervisors. Boudlal said today that she was called a “terrorist,” a “camel” and a “bitch” by supervisors and co-worker as well as repeatedly subjected to comments about Arabs being bombmakers and terrorists. “When she reported these attacks to her Disney managers, she was told that she had to put up with them, told that Disney knew there was a problem, but that the solution was the directive from her bosses that she needed to stop complaining”, said ACLU chief counsel Mark Rosenbaum today. ”Walt Disney Parks and Resorts has a long history of accommodating a variety of religious requests from cast members of all faiths. However, because we have not seen the lawsuit, we cannot comment specifically about this situation at this time”, Disney spokeswoman Suzi Brown said in a statement.
After two years working at Disneyland, the Moroccan-born Boudlal, then a hostess at the resort’s Storyteller Café, informed the company in August 2010 that she was going to wear the religious headdress for observance of Ramadan. Boudlal said at the time that she learned of her right to wear the hijab as she was completing her successful U.S. citizenship exams. With no response from Disney, except to say according to Boudlal that they would get back to her, the employee showed up for work on August 15, 2010 wearing her hijab. Boudlal says the company, who has very strict uniform and appearance polices, told her that day she would have to either remove the religious garb, wear a hat Disney provided or work where the public couldn’t see her. “My managers refused to permit me to wear a hijab even after I pointed out the manner by which other employees dressed and looked,” said Boudlal today. Declining those options Boudlal was turned away from work four times that week and on August 18 filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Boudlal says she even offered to wear a hijab with the Disney logo on it as a compromise but was rebuffed by her managers.” This is the most egregious case of religious harassment I have ever seen. At Disney, animated characters have more civil rights than the people who work there”, said lawyer Anne Richardson, who is representing Boudlal personally. “Through this lawsuit we seek to permanently enjoin Disney from requiring its Muslim employees to hide their faith and to abide by both federal and state laws on harassment and hostile work environment”, she added. Boudlal has not worked at Disneyland since August 21, 2010. On August 8, 2012, Boudlal and her lawyers got a notice of right to sue from the Commission, a source tells Deadline. This notice prompted moving forward with today’s lawsuit. “Had Imane been Princess Jasmine, a cartoon Muslim, Disney would not only have permitted her to wear a hijab, but also exploited it in the film Aladdin on the way to grossing over 200 million on revenues. But Disney’s tolerance of religious practices of Muslim women does not extend to real life women. Imane would have been acceptable to Disney only were she an animated character,” added Rosenbaum. “This is not Mickey Mouse bigotry, it is cold and calculating religious intolerence unacceptable according to our laws and most cherished values,” he also noted. This is not the first time Disney has been sued over the hijab. In 2004, a Disneyworld employee who also wanted to wear her hijab at work sued the company. That employee said she had been let go from her job in Orlando, Fla. after refusing Disney’s offer to work behind the scenes. The employee and the company eventually settled out of court. The employee did not return to work at Disney.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.



disney has always had a strict dress and appearance code. this woman knew that when she took the job. this is an absolute shame that she is hijacking the legal system.
I don’t know much about the specifics of this case, but just because Disnry has “always had” a dress code doesn’t mean that it’s legal.
Actually, yes it does. But good try.
Where do you work? DO you have a job?
Let’s pretend you work in an office – show up next week wearing t-shirts with cartoon characters and short shorts…
You work at a grocery store, a movie theater, Starbucks… Whatever — show up wearing your own clothes and not the required uniform. Tell me how that works out.
Under Title VII, religious discrimination in employment, unless done by a religious organization, is unlawful.
Correct, but as I (a non-lawyer) understand it, just because you may not discriminate in whom you hire based on religion does not mean you have to accommodate every facet of your employees’ religion(s). As far as I can tell, her coworkers treated her poorly for being Muslim (which is wrong and actionable) but the company never fired her for such. Could you clarify on this?
The same law, if I recall, prohibits gender discrimination. What if a company were to have a rule stating that in an office men must wear shirts with sleeves, while women may wear office-appropriate sleeveless shirts? How would that be handled?
If the dress code including banning the wearing of crosses, Jewish stars and yarmulke’s, then I might call it a dress code. If not, it is religious bigotry.
This looks like it will go to Disney unless discovery finds written evidence of a hostile work environment. Disney gave her two options – either work in the back of the restaurant or wear a hat to cover it. According to the EEOC —
Moreover, if the dress code conflicts with an employee’s religious practices and the employee requests an accommodation, the employer must modify the dress code or permit an exception to the dress code unless doing so would result in undue hardship.
The part I don’t understand is “In June 2010, after two years of working at Disney, Ms. Boudlal determined that she would permanently wear a hijab so as to act faithfully in accord with her religious beliefs.” She didn’t wear the hijab for two years, as she knew it would create a problem.
If you think this is strict, check out the dress code for UBS.
EX-ACTLY!
Actually, your quote of the EEOC policy actually HELPS her case. Allowing her to wear a hajib in PUBLIC would NOT result in an undue hardship for Disney.
Depends on how broadly you define “accommodation”. I think one could argue that Disney did, in fact, make an accommodation by offering her employment in an area of the company where the dress code would not be an issue.
I know times are hard, but REALLY, this is RIDICULOUS. People kill me trying to use religion to sue and get over. Read the company’s dress code and bylaws and stop trying to use religion as a quick payday. Disney did everything in their power to accommodate her and she turned them down. This sounds like a setup, I hope she loses. Soon, laws are going to be created and dress codes are going to be updated at companies that will ruin it for everyone, especially those who are strong in their religious faith that do not use it to get over.
“[...]would have to either remove the religious garb, wear a hat Disney provided or work where the public couldn’t see her.”
Honestly, I think the last option should have been fine. The ACLU is acting as if Disney immediately fired Boudlal just for wearing the hijab one day.
Would a Jewish man be allowed to wear a yarmulke with his Disney uniform? If the answer is yes, then Boudlal should be allowed to wear her hijab. If the answer is no…
I’ve never seen a Disney employee wearing a yarmulke. Disney is a private company. It’s not discrimination just like companies that want your tattoos covered or not have crazy hair or piercings.
The difference is that the yarmulke can easily be covered by another head covering, such as a hat, meaning there would be no conflict. Jewish tradition does not call for the yarmulke to necessarily be seen, and in fact many conceal it under another head covering (for fashion, weather or subtlety purposes).
They gave her options. This is just crazy…
waste of time and money. private company==they set the rules. If I worshipped a giant banana and “had” to wear a carmen miranda fruit hat, would that be ok?
Hey, your on-the-spot made up religion sounds as legitimate as the three Abrahamic faiths, so why not? Seriously, only difference between yours and there’s is time, lots of it, but merit and legitimacy wise totally equally. Actually, yours may be better, you haven’t murdered scores of people or oppressed minorities or homosexuals have you?
It’s obvious that more and more religion is being used as a reason to not adhere to the rules. “But my religions says this, my religions says that…” since you’re so well tuned into what your religion says, why apply to a job which you know going in has strict dress code and won’t accommodate you or your religious beliefs?
Disney is an areligious company. They provide an escape from the real world of religion, politics, etc. As far as I know, they do not allow Jews to wear yalmukahs, or Christians to wear crosses. This is not a case of religious discrimination, it is a case of enforcing a dress code and maintaining the Disney illusion. She knowingly took a job where she would not be permitted to wear the hijab, then suddenly decided she was going to wear it anyway. Disney then tried to accommodate her by giving her a different position, which she refused. If in fact she was called names and subjected to overt racism, that is completely unacceptable. But before jumping to conclusions we should wait to see how those claims play out in court.
Disney is a private company, not public, so they have a right to enforce their rules. For a long time, male cast members were not allowed to have facial hair. If you want to work at the park, you have to follow their rules. Part of working for Disney means creating the feel of early 1900′s small town America so one has to abide by their costume rules. Disney did accommodate her by having her work backstage, but she didn’t like that option. Her case has no merit.
“Disney is a private company, not public…”
That’s not what Wikipedia says.
Even being a public company isnt an issue. They are beholden to shareholders, they are not a govenrment agency behold to voters or the general public. Visible Disney employees are essentially actors creating an illusion through their performance. Anyone who takes an acting job knows that theyre not going to be able to choose the costume they wear on stage. If this woman doesnt understand that she was being hired as an actress, then she doesnt understand the job well enough to be hired in the first place.
Ha, did you read the complaint? She wasn’t an actress. She worked at a damn cafe as a hostess.
Justin J. Poppiti – You apparently didn’t read the comment above you carefully. What Temis was saying is that ANYONE who is hired for ANY JOB that makes them VISIBLE to the public at Disneyland is playing a role that promotes and reinforces a certain image. In other words, they are acting a part, which there in turn makes them an actor.
She knew she had to play a role of sorts when she started working at Disney. Why did she not wear it from the beginning? She does not have a case. Her excuses for not wearing it when she started are ill-conceived.
And IDLC – are you serious? Wikipedia as your credible source? The Walt Disney Corporation is absolutely a private conglomerate. Always has been.
Disney is a public company. Their stock ticker is displayed on the right side of this page along with a bunch of other media companies
I think that you are defining “public” and “private” differently than the other poster. It is private in the sense that it is not a government entity, controlled by and accountable to the taxpayers. It is public in the sense that it has publicly listed and traded stock.
wait a minute. this is from 2008. Why did she wait 4 years ? If shes going to work for Disney – there is a uniform of sorts that you have to wear.(Everyone knows that. Why would she seek employment there.Everyone that works there blends in.) and I have news for her Jasmine doesn’t wear a hijab
Maybe she waited 4 years ’cause no one else will bend the rules and hire her & now wants $$$$$$$$$$. Easy $$$$$$ ’cause America allows one to sue; like all those other countries (smerk).
Wow, this is from the people that champion every form of indecent dress. They actually discriminated against someone for wearing a headscarf. I’m have no doubt it’s true. Disney has the most warped set of ethics and company policies ever seen through the product that they put out for consumption. Preaching acceptance of all kinds of immoral behavior while discriminating and holding down others for their religious values has become the Disney model of ethics.
If missing four days of work after declining options to work backstage, or wear a hat, is the “most egregious case of religious harassment I have ever seen”, then this lawyer is either very sheltered or very prone to exaggeration.
If this person was indeed verbally harassed, she has a case. If it’s just about the hijab, she needs to stop wasting everyone’s time. She was working for a company that dresses people up as cartoon pigs. If she didn’t know what she was getting into when she applied for a job at Disney, then she dies notdeserve to be granted citizenship of the U.S. People aren’t allowed to enter a convenience store with a hoodie on where I live, much less a hijab.
Read the complaint. OBVIOUSLY, it’s NOT just about the hijab. If her allegations are true, she DEFINITELY proved that she worked in a hostile work environment.
And, where in the hell do you live that one isn’t allowed to wear a hoodie or a hijab?
Heres her problem. She’s being a puppet for the Union that’s who helped her understand some of the religious rights she has. However she signed a contract when she accepted employment that spells out the rules regarding te costume you wear. On top of that from previous articles I have read there was a Disney College Program cast member that was also Muslim and found the Disney Provided Costume appropriate Hikab completely acceptable because it cover the areas required by the Koran. Her case is DIW and the ACLU is barking up the wrong tree and needs to pull their head out the behinds and see that she has no case. She was likely fired due to attendance issues and not for her religious beliefs. I know personally that Disney is very accommodating. The Hotel Union is behind this
Puppet.
Focusing just on the hijab shows your bias. Read the complaint. There are documented instances of ethnic and religious slurs. She did work in a hostile environment according to Title VII.
they should assign her to work in epcot center. at one of their attractions on world showcase, at morocco…she can wear her religious attire there? if not, then she should take a hike.
I believe she works at Disneyland in California. Not Disneyworld in Florida where Epcot is.
Disney employees are considered “On-stage” and their workplace is considered a performing arts venue to the company. They are called “Cast members”.
If you are an actor and want to play Tom Sawyer, do you feel you should be allowed to wear a religious headdress while on-stage?
And at the end of the day, as unfortunate as this is, the vast majority of tourists at the park don’t want to feel threatened and the park doesn’t want to deal with those who feel that way either.
Everyone get over it. Its like the girl who sued Disney for discrimination because she was too fat to play Snow White. Seriously. Get. Over. It.
Crikey, the right-wingers come out in force once the topic turns to minority rights (and, of course, it’s even easier because she’s a Muslim). Discrimination laws are pretty clear that you can’t force someone to do something against their religion. NOW, if it can be proven that she under-PERFORMED in her job, that’s another thing. But, give the woman a chance to have her side be heard in court before you resort to the race card to tar her.
Joe,
She did not have an issue working at Disneyland until 2 years into the job. She then decided after she was prodded by the Union she was a part of to make an issue of wearing the Hijab. At no time until then did she want to wear the Hijab. She is a puppet of the Union in this matter. All of this came out conveniently after she became a US citizen and not before. This is not discrimination, this is out right attacks for not getting exactly what she wanted, as prodded / directed by the Union reps that she was listening to. She was not dismissed because of her not wanting to wear the approved Hijab that was presented to her, or accept a position out of public view. Remember Disney it’s all about the Show, they were willing to give her accommodations that would have fit with the show but she rejected them. No one is pulling a race card on her, it’s about the sense of entitlement that she has regarding the situation that she waited 2 years to have.
I didn’t say that DISNEY necessarily was pulling the Race Card, but the folks here in the Comment section telling the woman to Get Outta America if she doesn’t like it. All I’m asking is let the facts speak for themselves and have a day in court, but, leave out the racist propaganda.
She should work where no one cares. Everybody else at Disney has to comply with a dress code; believe me, many people would want to wear something else other than what they wear to work. She is not being denied practicing her religion. If she wants to work in a big company that has a dress code, guess what, don’t work there. She can work somewhere else. Muslims want to be accepted in our society. Why must they always want to be the “exception”? When you come to the U.S. you conform to a certain degree. If she doesn’t like it, she has the freedom to find another job. I am not a fan of the Disney corporation, but I hope they don’t cave in on this. And the ACLU is wasting its money and my donations for this case.
It’s complete bullshit. This happens all the time in the UK, Muslim women who try to make a quick buck by claiming racist practices.
Everybody knows there is a dress code, and come on 4 years? It took her that long to find a schmuck lawyer in Reseda to take up this jellybean of a case? Please.
I find it highly suspect that she all of a sudden decided to begin wearing the scarf for Ramadan, when the vast majority of Muslim women I’ve met either wear it or don’t. I think she was trying to set Disney up for the suit, whether orchestrated by a union (as suggested above) or someone else.
Also, to the yarmulka comment above; that’s a bit different. The yarmulka is a very small head covering (symbolic, really) and it fits easily under a hat (which it says Disney provides upon request). Jewish men have no objection to wearing a hat on the outside, and in fact some find that an acceptable substitute all together.
If she was harassed over her faith, then she has a case on that basis, but not a case for wrongful termination. However that would have been a much smaller lawsuit and I think she was trying to make it as large as possible.
Something here doesn’t pass the smell test. If they were willing to give her a job outside of the public view and she felt deeply she wanted to wear the headcovering she should have taken the alternate job. Employees at the theme parks are considered “cast members” and I totally see the point of view that they require a specific dress code. The hyperbole used by her lawyer doesn’t help. That sais, there’s no excuse for verbal abuse from managers or co-workers.
If Disney or any other company has a dress code or does not want someone to wear something that covers their head, then that should be their right to do so. As far as I am aware Disney is a pretty inclusive employer. Employees should not be running the show.
I can agree with both sides. One: she should not have to deal with harassment from coworkers over her religion. But two: Disney is a place where people go to escape the realities of the outside world. We pay to see people in character or to be dressed a certain way that keeps with the magic and stories told in the park. A hajib, while perfectly acceptable outside the park, takes away from what Disney is expressing. It kind of ties in with adults not being able to wear costumes to the park. So, harassment bad but I think Disney should be allowed to enforce their dresscode.
I am a ex cast member. This lawsuit is another thing for someone from another country to take advantage of the legal system. You want to wear that stupid thing on your head, go back to your country. I am so sick of them being over here and wearing those. You knew from taking the job, that was not allowed. I want to go to disneyland and I am sure so many other people do to and not think they are in a different country. This is America. Get a life.
So were you fired for being a racist bitch? I think Disney is well within its right to restrict what its cast members wear because it is trying to maintain a certain look, just like if one were donning a costume for a play or film. But to say that one should be restricted from wearing religious garb in America is ignorant, bigoted and diametrically opposed to everything America stands for.
And I suppose in keeping with your idea about wanting to remember you are in America when in Disneyland (forgetting about what a diverse country America really is, Disney’s depictions of other cultures in its films and the global culture themes of some of its parks) that we should therefore ban patrons from wearing similar garb?
Personally, I think wearing religious garments in everyday life is silly and almost costume-like. That’s my opinion, and that’s why I don’t wear any. Other people don’t think it’s silly. That’s their right and it is therefore also their right to wear such. That’s what makes America great.
So to recap: Disney should be allowed to set the standard of dress for customer-facing cast members. Nobody should be restricted from wearing religious garb simply because “this is America”. You are the one who needs to get a life.
I keep hearing people agree with Disney. If any of you had brain at all you would agree with this women. She is protecting employees and freedom to be an individual. I noticed because this is a Muslim women people are protecting Disney (a big corporation not an innocent place for your child) over a women who is fighting for her rights! For those of you who assume that she is lying or just in this for money let me give you some good advice. Assume ass out of U and ME!
Please go through and actually read the comments defending Disney. You are a bigger sensationalist than her lawyer (and you’re not even getting paid on this) and if you had a brain you would have comprehended the more thoughtful posts and understood the real issues here. This isn’t about someone’s fundamental rights; Disney did not fire her for her choice of religious garb, they said they would relocate her to a position which didn’t require that a certain, specific uniform be worn.
And this is not about religious freedom: when you have “cast members” for anything else (play, TV show, film) you, as producer/director/etc. have full discretion over what they wear and how they appear. Disney is putting on a show with every aspect of the theme parks and things should be no different; this isn’t a ride operator, an engineer, a chef, a janitor or a financial analyst, none of whom would presumably have such restrictions in place. Did you see the HBO miniseries a few years ago about Saddam Hussein? Saddam was actually played by an Israeli. Do you think if he were a religious Jew, and insisted on wearing a kippah (head covering) the entire time that he still could have played the part? Do you think he could have successfully sued over it?
The fact that you are jumping to conclusions without examining all of the evidence doesn’t make you any better than any of the ignorant pro-Disney posts (and there certainly are some; Margo for example) simply because you’re rooting for the underdog.
And you are assuming that people like me who believe this to be a frivolous case are racists. If this was a Jew demanding to wear his yarmulke, a Christian wanting to retain his cross neckless, or a Hare Krishna insisting on keeping his shaved head, I would think the exact same thing.
Mary, If a person wants rights and individualism then go get a job where they is NO UNIFORM THAT EVERYONE ELSE HAS TO ADHERE TO! What makes her so special that she can change the way Disney presents their cast members and represents their name and history?! That is B.S. that we are against this woman because she is Muslim! They wouldn’t let ANYONE…get it…ANYONE just wear cut off jeans, short shorts, mohawks dyed like the rainbow, piercings throughout their face… NO MATTER IF IT WAS FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS OR TO STATE INDIVIDUALITY! Do you think Hot Dog on a Stick let’s their employees wear anything BUT those ridiculous hats..NOOOO! There is a dress code! When Disney hires a cast member…you know what is expected of you. If it isn’t something that adheres to your life then WALK OUT. Don’t take the job and then try to CHANGE the position and then wait YEARS to try to make a ridiculous lawsuit out of it! Disney is VERY thorough upon their hiring…I know…because I work there and it is one of the most fairest and equal opportunity employers I have ever worked for. So coming from someone on the INSIDE Mary…you have NO clue on what you are talking about!
Disney provided alternatives and she refused therefore they have every right to get rid of her.
If you worked in a factory that required you to wear steel capped boots and hi visibility clothing and you rocked up in shirt, shorts and shoes then they will turn you away because you don’t conform to their dress code.
Here we go, again. Sue, sue, sue. This is America and we have rules & laws and Freedom to choose. Simply, no matter what your religion, custom, nationality, etc., is, if you do not like the way things are doe here, no one’s stopping you from going elswhere to try and change their rules, laws, etc. People come to America for what America has to offer, and once America changes from its core, it’ll no longer be America. So, don’t try to change us, change yourselves or… as we say, find a country willing to change to what YOU believe, etc. or… find a country to live in that meets your… well, you get the picture. America… like it or leave it.
You guys are focusing so much on the hijab, you’re forgetting about all of the harassment she faced from her superiors before she even began her decision to wear it. She was discriminated against and has every right to sue. And Disney is a public company.
Exactly, Jake. I bet that most of the people commenting against boudlal didn’t even read the complaint.
Unfortunately, she made it about the hijab (or her lawyer did) in order to make a bigger “splash”. By making that a major component of the suit with such suspect timing she, in fact, is detracting attention away from the real issue. If this gets tossed as a result she has nobody to blame but herself.
Actually, there are two major claims: 1) refusing to let her wear the hijab and 2) hostile work environment. Even if the hijab issue is tosses, her hostile work environment claim would STILL prevail.
Right, but my point was that the legitimate claim will be undermined by the frivolous one. Disney will no doubt move to dismiss both and I think a judge will be more likely to side with them on the (apparently) legitimate claim because the larger claim, for wrongful termination, is so completely unfounded that there is either a conscious or subconscious desire to penalize the plaintiff for bringing it. Not saying that’s how it would go, but I think it’s more likely than if she’d just brought a claim over a hostile work environment.
Harassment? Heresy.