Fox Broadcasting has asked for a preliminary federal injunction against Dish Network‘s Primetime Antime DVR service with AutoHop commercial skipping feature. Fox filed a request (read it here) with the federal court for the Central District of California to block Dish “from further infringement of Fox’s copyrighted television programs identified in the Complaint in this action and
from further breaches of Dish’s retransmission consent agreements with Fox.” The court has set a hearing on Fox’s request for September 21. In what Fox and the other networks in the dispute consider proof that the primary purpose of the Primetime Anytime and AutoHop is copyright infringement, Dish earlier this week modified its own litigation and the device’s software to emphasize “optional” recording and commercial-skipping instead the original wording “automatic.” In addition to Fox the other broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC are fighting Dish in court on multiple fronts. Dish’s view is that the satcaster and its customers already pay for the right to watch the networks’ programming with or without commercials.


I sure wish Dish would hurry up paying the court costs to have this case thrown out so that DirecTV can release the ad-blocking software that they’ve had sitting on the shelf for years (waiting for Dish to take all the heat and pay all the associated-costs)…
why are these clowns in court all the time to block these innovations? spend a fraction of the lawyer costs on a handful of mediocre coders and you could bypass these systems as fast as they can be created. rupert, wake the fuck up!
The confusion may be the issue of contract interference (there is a legal term). If the networks have a contract with the advertisers that the commercials will be aired and someone develops a product that blocks out those commercials, whoever applies that product to their broadcasting may be interfering with the network-advertiser agreements.
Sascha, it’s “tortious interference” of contract. But if that’s the legal principle the networks are relying upon, why aren’t companies that create web browsers (MS, Google, Mozilla, Apple) being sued by online advertisers for creating pop up blockers? Online advertisers pay a fee to websites for their ads to run. If a user enables the pop up blocker on a browser, that ad doesn’t display? That’s an analogous situation.
yes, but that person never was part of that agreement.
Oh, come on, you can’t get rid of the “Hopp-ah” (someone had to say it!).
Simple solution. Buy a Roku or Apple TV, buy or rent new tv shows for $1.99, or a season pass (dunno if there is an equivalent in amazon), between $35 and $55 a season. Five shows you watch every week (when they air), that’s a maximum of $275 a year. Use netflix $7.99 a month for reruns (instead of paying dish/directv/cable company) for channels like TBS/TNT which include ads.
Don’t mind limited ads? Get hulu plus for $7.99 a month instead of buying episodes/seasons directly.
Apple TV cost: $99, Roku starts at $50.
HD video from netflix or hulu use about 2 or 3 megabit for HD, less for SD. Most people have enough broadband speed to cover those two. The only downside to hulu, you have to wait until the next day to watch it (unlike say, the BBC, which is viewable after the show airs), so not best for if you want to watch tonights episode of say, the Colbert Report tonight.
You can get the nightly national news for free (pre-recorded), some air live news online. In the US MLB, NBA and NHL have streaming options (on both roku and apple tv), NFL has not fully joined the online world though. Want the local news? Get it over the air, for free.