
Alfred Hitchcock has been dead for 32 years. The last film he made, Family Plot, was released in 1976 yet his
popularity among movie fans and cineastes alike has never seemed to wane. To put it bluntly, Hitch has never been hotter. This week proof of that was offered by the ascension of his 1958 classic Vertigo to the No. 1 spot on the British Film Institute’s Sight & Sound survey of the so-called 50 Greatest Films Of All Time as selected this year by 846 critics, film scholars and historians, the largest sampling ever in the once a decade list that has been compiled every 10 years since 1962. Ever since the inception of the esteemed poll the British international film journal has named Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane as the Number 1 greatest film of all time — until 2012 when suddenly Hitchcock vaulted to the top after a slow, steady ascent since first appearing on the list of the Top 10 films in 1982. It is certainly interesting that this particular Hitchcock film starring James Stewart and Kim Novak, not even a huge hit in 1958 and recipient of only two minor Oscar nominations, for Color Art Direction and Sound, has become the master’s masterpiece in the eyes of the world’s top film writers and scholars.
The only other Hitchcock film on the list is Psycho at number 35, although I personally count numerous others including North By Northwest, Rear Window, Notorious, even The Birds as equally deserving. I’m not at all sure Vertigo, great as it is, is the greatest of all time. Really? David Lean who directed such immortal greats as Lawrence Of Arabia and The Bridge On The River Kwai doesn’t have a single film in the top 50 and you could argue all day about other omissions and inclusions (there’s no DAVID Lean but there is DAVID Lynch at No. 28 with Mulholland Drive. Hmmm). And I have never gotten what is so brilliant about Carl Dreyer’s 1927 The Passion of Joan Of Arc yet there it is perched at No. 9 with these film nerds waxing poetic about its endless use of closeups. Spare me. But the arguments about what constitutes a truly great film is what makes it all fun. I do wish the Sight & Sounders took comedy a lot more seriously, but in the egregious omission of so many fine comic masterpieces they are just like their brethren at the Oscars. The highest ranking pure comedy is way down at number 34 for Buster Keaton’s The General, although the 1952 musical Singin’ In The Rain is No. 20, the only musical on the entire list.
Nevertheless the list only confirms the lasting impact of Hitchcock who suddenly seems to be everywhere
and now could figure heavily in upcoming Oscar and Emmy contests. Just this week as detailed on Deadline, Tippi Hedren, star of the director’s The Birds and Marnie, appeared at TCA to promote The Girl, an upcoming HBO film premiering in October starring Toby Jones as Hitchcock and Sienna Miller as Hedren as it details the making of The Birds and the true-life horror Hedren claims was inflicted on her by the director. “He ruined my career but he didn’t ruin my life,” she told the press. “He was evil, deviant, almost to the point of dangerous.” Wow. Hedren knows how to make waves. And so does Hitchcock even though he’s not here to defend himself over these charges largely dealing with sexual harassment. He is also not here to weigh in on a planned 3D remake of The Birds (ugh) or even Gus Van Sant’s ill-fated 1998 shot-by-shot remake of Psycho.
In addition to the small screen film The Girl, Fox Searchlight has one for the big screen that is currently in post-production. Based on Stephen Rebello’s 1990 non-fiction book, Alfred Hitchcock And The Making Of Psycho, the similarly-titled film version stars Anthony Hopkins as Hitch, Helen Mirren as his wife Alma and Scarlett Johansson as Janet Leigh who co-starred in Psycho and won a Best Supporting Actress Oscar nomination. Although it is set around the making of the 1960 classic (Hitch was nominated for the Best director Oscar but lost, and in fact never won), it is mostly about the relationship between the director and his wife. Should Searchlight decide to make a run for it the movie could conceivably become a last-minute entry in this year’s Oscar sweepstakes. There are reasons for and against the move and they might also include wanting to keep some distance from HBO’s aforementioned October telefilm The Girl. which presents a much more negative portrait of the director. Yet Hopkins, Mirren and Johansson are all thought to be strong Oscar fodder and that might be irresistible for Searchlight if the film can be readied in time.
Before beginning Friday night’s opening panel (which I moderated) of Edit Fest coincidentally held at the Hitchcock Theatre at Universal Studios, Pamela Martin (The Fighter, Little Miss Sunshine), who is editing the film, told me it is currently undetermined whether Searchlight will try for a late 2012 Oscar-qualifying release. She says they are still doing the director’s cut and if they decide to get it out this year it will mean a big rush to get it ready in time. She has nothing but praise for the performances and singled out Johansson.
Wouldn’t it be something if Johansson were to be nominated for playing Janet Leigh playing Marion Crane in the same category Janet Leigh was a nominee 1960? And if she were to win that could become one of Oscar’s greatest ironies ever.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


Vertigo is a wonderful, quaint and deeply-flawed nostalgic look into Hitch’s and America’s early fascination with pop psychology, but if, according to this grab bag confederacy of nincompoop critics, it’s the “greatest film ever made” then Tallulah Bankhead is America’s eternal sweetheart and Mark Wahlberg deserves the Irving Thalberg award for lifetime achievement.
Vertigo is not even the greatest Hitchcock film.
The General, which I love, is not a “pure comedy”. It is an action film with gags, something pretty common today but unheard of in its time. Singin’ In The Rain, which I also love, is much more of a comedy – albeit one with music. (Night At The Opera also has lots of music, but I’ve never heard anyone refer to it as a musical.)
>>Singin’ In The Rain…is much more of a comedy – albeit one with music.
This is the silliest thing I’ve read in a long time. The characters burst into song many times in the movie for many reasons — in performance (“All I Do is Dream of You” and “Would You?,”) in joy (“Make ‘em Laugh,” “Good Mornin’” and “Moses Supposes”) and in love (“You Were Meant for Me” and “Singin’ in the Rain.”) They express their emotions through song and dance, a hallmark of the genre. You can hardly say the same thing about A Night at the Opera!
Gore Vidal has died, but the multitudes of his unknown failed but non-plussed wannabes clearly haven’t.
Kane will always be #1 for me.
Vertigo wouldn’t even make my top 20.
I think both are destined to be eclipsed by 2001. It’s not only moved up on the Critic’s list, but now sits at #2 (tied with Kane) on the Director’s list. 2001‘s impact, influence, and especially its contribution to the “language” of film will eventually take it to #1. This is simply the universe unfolding – literally – as it should.
Art has no “greatest”.
There are works – film, paintings, literature, music/songs, etc – that move different hearts and minds in different ways. It diminishes great works when we start trying to pinnacle one over another. Let’s not forget that…and simply enjoy.
well said!
couldn’t agree more!
More of a North by Northwest fan myself.
What about “Rear Window – Dial M for Murder !!
Same here.
So what exactly happened between the last time they made the list and now to make Citizen Kane a worse film and Vertigo a better one? Did the redo Vertigo in 3D? Or is this just emphasizing the subjectivity of lists like this?
Art is, by its nature, subjective.
The first Sight and Sound poll was 1952. The Bicycle Thief was voted best then, Citizen Kane first in 1962.
I’ve regarded Vertigo as arguably the best film since I first saw it on ABC as a prime time movie in the late 1960s. 15 or so viewing later, it has kept its greatness and grown in my esteem for it. It is a virtuoso work of style and technique, but also a profoundly personal work of a troubled (like most great artists) man who used art to deal with his inner conflicts.
It also won because of Hitchcock being arguably the greatest director of all time, and Vertigo having become the “go to” film to vote for in such polls, as “Kane” became for film, even though he made other films many think of being as great or greater.
Years ago there was a story(apocraphyl for the record) about Hitchcock that went somnething like this. He had completed one of his films let’s say Psycho. He asked around if anyone would be afraid to spend the night on the set alone offering a reward to the person who volunteered. One of the crew people maybe even a janitor separated himself from the crowd and took Hitchcock’s offer. Of course you’ll be handcuffed to a post Hitchcock said. The man agreed. Hithcock called for some champagne to celebrate t and both men finished their drink. And as everbody was walking off, Hithchcok told the man he had put a laxative in his champagne.And that’s the story I heard. Drull? Yes? Amusing Yes? And possibly pure Hitchcock.
These lists are designed to just stir up some controversy and keep some focus on the great films. I do wonder how many of these critics are women. Vertigo is a great film, but I don’t think the female audience is too thrilled with the choice of a man’s obsession with a woman.
I’d watch Vertigo before I would rewatch Kane personally – and have done for years. Just how my film preferences work in respect of those two. So yeah, I would put it first personally.
But yes, I think these lists are more useful for conversation that representing an actual list of the best (this would also apply to an American Film Institute ranking as well – the fact it’s a British list is neither here nor there) films given the subjectivity of film.
Verto is ofcourse a great film, but flawed( especially towards the last 15-20 minutes). I’m surprised North by Northwest or even Rear Window weren’t picked instead as they are Hitchs’ true masterpieces.
The real secret to Citizen Kane’s dominance isn’t consistency in a poll, but the fact that it’s become part of the pop culture lexicon as a synonym for greatness. For decades, people have been using the film as a standard of measure for everything from bad movies to comic books to alcoholic clown movies. (Seriously. Google it.)
Somehow, I just don’t see “Vertigo” catching on in quite the same way.
“Shakes, you’re alive!” ;^)
The Passion of Joan of Arc is pretty great, actually. But for someone who named The Birds as one of Hitchcock’s best, I can understand the misunderstanding.
Yes. Passion of Joan of Arc really surprised me with how modern the acting felt – it was years ahead of its time. And I’m not a kneejerk “older is better” kind of movie watcher.
Also, I adore Vertigo, though I would never defend it because it’s such a strange, divisive film. Still, my favorite Hitch – in fact, my favorite movie of all time – is Strangers on a Train, which I can’t imagine anybody disliking. But obviously, to each his own.
And the whole first half of The Birds is boring as hell, though the second half is fantastic.
Vertigo? Including the embarrassing dream sequence? And the rushed, unsatisfying ending? THAT Vertigo?
Most everybody seems to place more emphasis on Hitchcock’s later work, VERTIGO included. Love VERTIGO, particularly Bernard Herrmann’s score (he also did KANE, so he is 1-2 on that list as far as composers go).
How about some love for Hitch’s earlier films such as 39 STEPS, YOUNG & INNOCENT, and my personal favorite, SHADOW OF A DOUBT?
P.S. And, Dreyer’s PASSION is brilliant.
I love “Vertigo”, but there is no way in hell its number one.
The fact that “The Godfather” wasn’t even in the top 20 shows what a joke this list is!
GODFATHER isn’t in the top twenty this time because it had previously been voted on as a COMBINATION-”GODFATHER-parts one AND two”, counted as a single film voted on, and it was decided that gave it an unfair advantage; hence this time it was decided that they would have to be voted on as seperate films- which naturally split the vote between them.
I’d say that this is certainly convieneint with the upcoming August 28th release of VERTIGO [DVD + DIGITAL COPY] (UNIVERSAL’S 100TH ANNIVERSARY) edition. If anything I’m a litte surprised that nobody has figured this out yet.
That would certainly explain it.
How wonderfully, morbidly appropriate that at the same time VERTIGO (to me, Hitchcock’s sickest film, though one of his least satisfying) topples CITIZEN KANE from the throne, Tippi Hedren (after 50 years) reveals that the filmmaker had a Vertigo-like obsession for her (though far more malevolent than Jimmy Stewart’s with poor Kim Novak which, by comparison, comes off more like a schoolboy crush). The sadistic old perv must be chuckling in his grave! (Not that I don’t appreciate Hitchcock. Like other commentators on this subject, I’d without hesitation choose REAR WINDOW as “The Greatest”, just as I have absolutely NO interest in ANY filmmaker’s personal life.)
“Kane” has influenced more films since it was made than any other movie. “Vertigo” has influenced only Brian DePalma’s “Obsession.” Check, please.
Have we forgotten Hitchcocks, “Rebecca”??
His first American film and his only film to win an Oscar for Best Picture.
“Citizen Kane” isn’t just a great film,it’s a seminal film. Much of what we see in Kane was never seen before Kane. Non-linear storytelling, SPFX model work on a scale rarely tried before, choreography of the actors as if they were in a ballet, deep focus, ceilings on scenery, and a script that eviscerated a public figure with strong ties to the film industry, both overtly, in the character who represented William Randolph Hearst’s mistress and covertly, in the use of the phrase “Rosebud” which was, apparently Hearst’s nickname for her… well you know….
In today’s comic book-dominated cinema, it is interesting to note that most of the comic book greats, such as Jack Kirby, said they learned how to be great storytellers from “Citizen Kane.” So, in essence, Welles helped create Spidermann, The X-Men, and The Avengers.
“Vertigo” is a well-made film.
The way I look at things is what would I put in a time capsule
for future generations to see. The 20th century films I would put in are Lean’s Dr. Zhivago, Danny Kaye’s The Court Jester, Dassin’s The Naked City and Powell/Pressburger’s The Red Shoes to start.
John Arnold said it very well. Best is in the eye of the beholder.
I always think of Vertigo as a great love letter to SF & other parts of NoCal.
What, No Lawrence of Arabia? Cmon.
Any list of the greatest anything is by nature subjective. That said, Kane has some great sequences and also, sad to say, some bad ones. Vertigo has some excellent elements as well and also some lousy ones, as already pointed out. Rear Window is a nice tight film and definitely superior.
And what about Chinatown, for God’s sake? No flab or hokeyness
on that one.