Here’s more fodder for those movies gearing up about WikiLeaks and founder Julian Assange. After months of house arrest in Britain and an eight-week stint hiding out in London’s Ecuadorian embassy, Assange was today granted asylum by Ecuador. Britain then threw down the gauntlet and vowed to extradite Assange anyway. The controversial figure had been awaiting extradition to Sweden on allegations that he sexually assaulted two women. In June, he entered the embassy and petitioned for asylum, fearing that Sweden would ultimately surrender him to the U.S. – which would also like to prosecute him. Via WikiLeaks, Assange has caused embarrassment to and drawn the ire of the U.S government for publishing hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and classified documents. Ecuador said it granted the asylum because it believes Assange would be politically persecuted if extradited.
Assange is currently the subject of a host of TV and film projects (and until recently was himself hosting talk show World Of Tomorrow from the house in England where he was holed before moving to the embassy). Australian TV movie, Underground, starring Rachel Griffiths, Anthony LaPaglia and newcomer Alex Williams as a young Assange, is debuting in Toronto next month. NBCU International will start sales at the festival. Then there’s the WikiLeaks feature that’s being developed by DreamWorks. Deadline recently reported that Jeremy Renner is looking at playing Assange in that one and that the studio is talking to Bill Condon about directing. Further, Universal and Marc Shmuger have an Alex Gibney-directed documentary, and HBO, Universal and Megan Ellison are also working on films.
Back in the real world, Ecuador’s move could force a stand-off between it and the UK that would be worthy of the bigscreen. In a statement, the Foreign Office said: “Under our law, with Mr Assange having exhausted all options of appeal, the British authorities are under a binding obligation to extradite him to Sweden. We shall carry out that obligation. The Ecuadorian Government’s decision this afternoon does not change that.”
Former British ambassador to Moscow, Tony Brenton told the BBC: “I think the Foreign Office have slightly overreached themselves here… If we live in a world where governments can arbitrarily revoke diplomatic immunity and go into embassies then the life of our diplomats and their ability to conduct business in places like Moscow where I was and North Korea becomes close to impossible.”


I don’t follow this guys exploits enough to claim to be well schooled in his dilemma, but it does seem to be a bit heavy handed for Britain to storm the embassy to get someone who hasn’t been charged with a crime to my knowledge.
I remember an old case where a British policewoman was shot and killed outside the Libyan embassy, but the Brits did not go into the embassy to get the shooter. Maybe Mr Assange can tie himself to some fat petrodollar contracts to make his troubles go away.
Also, he must not fear that the USA has already secretly indicted him. That could never happen. His fears of torture in the USA are also groundless. That could never happen.
He should be concerned about Supermax though. The prison where you are allowed to be a prisoner and have zero human contact for a year at a time could be seen as necessary and just for his incarceration, especially after a televised trial.
I hope he is writing his book now, as it looks like he won’t be able to soon.Maybe he can get Salman Rushdie to help him out.
Britain is not about “to storm the embassy”, Lumiere. The Foreign and Commenwealth Office (FCO), the UK’s equivalent of the State Department, has not exactly threatened, because that would be so undiplomatic, but mentioned it could have the Ecuadorian embassy’s diplomatic status lifted, thus enabling the police to enter and arrest Assange. The legislation was enacted after the Libyan embassy incident. Of course, this would be a disastrous precedent, as the UK’s former ambassador to Moscow has today said, because some governments around the world would doubtless follow suit.
Assange is to be extradited to Sweden to stand trial for rape, having exhausted the UK legal system. Possibly the European one as well. His fear is the Swedes will then extradite him to the U.S. If that were to happen he won’t be tortured, just most likely face several thousand years in Supermax.
I had a Wikileaks project but somebody leaked it.
He’s certainly getting his primary motivation in all of this, which is attention. He’s no Daniel Ellsberg, though I’m sure he thinks he is.
Being as Assange is a creation of MI6/CIA/MOSSAD, all this drama that keeps happening to him, is pure theatre.
He’s like the ultimate intelligence psych-op reality show, a soap opera for leaking the right kind of dis-information and deception.
And being as the “mainstream” media is a major part of the banking/intelligence cartel that seems to run everything, all Assange’s exploits and “leaks” are reported as news, and as fact.
As anyone in intelligence will tell you, nothing gets reported or leaked, that hasn’t been sanctioned from the top. If you thought you were still living in a democracy, you were to say the least, mis-informed!
Is everybody buying this guy’s crap?
Last I checked the UK was going ahead with the extradition of a UK citizen for copyright violations … and this moron claims that Sweden is going to extradite him to the US but the UK is not? Didn’t he go to Sweden because he trusted them more not to extradite?
The UK citizen being extradited for copyright violations would be due to the bilateral treaty between that country and the U.S. It’s an arrangement that is being seen in the UK as increasingly unfair and weighted towards the U.S. because of the two country’s differing burdens of proof required before extradition is requested and granted.
Assange (I think the stress should be on the first syllable, by the way) was born in Australia. Unless he had dual citizenship or renounced his, then he remains an Australian. The alleged crimes occurred in Sweden, which has been granted his extradition by the UK legal system. Assange fought this ruling through the entire UK legal system to the Supreme Court, and lost every step of the way.
His fear is the Swedes will extradite him to the U.S. but at time of writing the U.S. has yet to apply for his extradition from anywhere. What treaty arrangements on this matter exist between Sweden and the U.S., I don’t know.
The one thing I do know about the man: it’s all about him. Everything is about him. You want a definition of narcissism or megalomania? Check your dictionary, under “Assange”. Whatever ‘good’ Wikileaks might have done, or yet do, has been nullified by the fact information released has resulted in the exposure and compromising of government operatives and operations, possibly even their deaths.
Let Assange spend the rest of his life holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy. Although I can’t help thinking, after sharing a building with him for a week, the Ecuadorians will leave him gift wrapped for the British police on the front step.