Sony Pictures for years was developing a Lance Armstrong biopic. Tonight that story received an ignoble ending. The celebrated athlete will be stripped Friday of his 7 Tour de France titles and banned from cycling for life by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency. So I raise the question: Did Hollywood miss its chance to tell a fascinating hero’s story? Or is there now an even more complex and interesting saga? Tonight, in his statement, Lance stressed that he decided to stop fighting the USADA investigation into whether he doped not because of new incriminating evidence but because he was up against a deadline. This was the last night he could decide to keep trying to prove his innocence. In a statement he described the USADA investigation as an “unconstitutional witch hunt” especially after the U.S. Justice Department conducted its own probe and took no action. Tonight’s ending is not neat and tidy: rather, it’s messy and sad. It also should be a movie, albeit a different one from first envisioned.
As a huge TdF fan myself, I think what happened to Armstrong tonight is tragic. I also thought a Lance biopic was a natural back in 2006. So why did it take Hollywood so long to put one together? Billy Gerber, the former Warner Bros President turned film producer, tried to sell it years ago after reading Armstrong’s bestselling book It’s Not About The Bike. fast forward, and producers Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy got lucky that then Columbia Pictures president of production Matt Tolmach was a cycling fanatic. (He could do some of those Tour De France-type climbs — though not as fast.) Tolmach knew that Armstrong’s unhappy youth, his sports prowess first as a triathlete and then as a cyclist, his cancer battle, his Live Strong yellow wristband campaign, his cancer foundation, his epic seven TdF titles, his cycling rivalries, his love-hate relationship with the Frenchand the sport of cycling, and his battle against doping accusations, made a heckuva tale. So Sony Pictures quietly moved forward with the project.
Immediately Armstrong and Sony got lucky: then Oscar nominee Jake Gyllenhaal wanted to star. There was a slight resemblance between the two guys, and the actor is even a long-time cyclist. He’d even begun training for the film. The European press went into a speculation frenzy when Lance and Jake first showed up together at the 2006 TdF. (Jake even joined the seven-time TdF winner in the Discovery team car for an Individual Time Trial.) Armstrong, his agent Bill Stapleton, Discovery sports manager Johan Bruyneel, and Tour de France Directors Jean Marie Blanc and Christian Prudhomme all had what insiders at the time called “a heart-to-heart discussion” aboard the Discovery bus about whether the Tour would block the project. Obviously the Tour’s assistance, while not required, would have been helpful to the biopic. Gyllenhaal and Armstrong became pals during Jake’s method process to get to know the sports legend.
And, as the many years of doping whispers became louder, the project suddenly went quiet. Now it’s time to resurrect it with a different arc.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


And please give it to no other writer than Aaron Sorkin
Maybe Sorkin could explain why Americans are NOT meant to win le Tour de France
Please tell me this is a sarcastic comment.
amen,
at least he will do right by the story!
You’re kidding, right?
Really? Few would have predicted an athlete who dominated a sport dominated by cheaters, a guy who was widely rumored to be doping as far back as 1996, would turn out to be dirty? I guess the few were the only ones paying attention.
One good thing about actors, there are no drugs to make an actor act better. Wait a minute…
If arrogance was a fuel he could power the world for years.
Would anyone want to see a movie about a purported cheat? Armstrong is arrogant to his back teeth. He’s no Amercian hero, that’s for sure.
God, no. Aaron Sorkin needs to go away again.
Who cares at this point? He is a cheater, end of story
If he doesn’t confess I think this will be the end of that project. The story needs an ending. We know that he cheated, but if he doesn’t confess there will always be conflicts about what the movie should say.
He needs to be a man and admit his wrongdoing to the world.
I see a massively insecure person with a Napoleon complex.
He was never found guilty and for the people posting to call him by names is ludacrous. I think it is a shame that the US is the one that pursued him, what is in it for them? Shame on them! No matter what, no one will change my opinion of him. He has done more for the sport of bicycling than anyone – the Tour is boring to watch now.
Yeah, there are ten former teammates who all have firsthand accounts of him doping, who have stories of him telling them how to dope and how to get away with it, and there’s one guy who says it’s a witch-hunt and he “doesn’t have the time” to fight it. Because if he fights it, all those witnesses are suddenly telling their stories UNDER OATH and their stories then become official. Without this testimony, Armstrong knows that there are people out there who will refuse to believe TEN people telling the same story and will continue to believe the ONE person who can never prove he DIDN’T cheat. The self-righteous unite!
Nikki,
I love ya but you can’t call yourself a lover of the Tour and find this tragic. To weed out this arrogant cheat and others who stain the sport is not tragic, it’s justice.
Excellent point!
If he has been tainting the sport of cycling for so many years, how is this end tragic?
Allegations doesn’t equal guilt. If he’s passing all of your tests then what the hell? A movie now would probably be more interesting
He did pass all the tests. Officials entered his home & rentals on the road for years at all hours of the night & day to test him. They always came unannounced, and he endured this for years. When I had cancer I went to the bookstore and flipped through many books on the topic, so many useless & sappy books. I picked up his “It’s Not About The Bike” and kept reading. I appreciated his honesty and humor and that’s the book I took home. His story helped me through. They can’t take away his book titles.
Making this film now would be an incomplete story. It will take time to see how the public reacts, and more importantly, what happens to Lance on all levels.
Will he be reviled? Will he still be admired? What happens to his philanthropic efforts and image? How does it impact him personally and with relationships? What will the future bring? Will Lance Armstrong just fade away from public interest? How does the story end…when and where? Does America really care about Lance and the world of cycling and doping?
Tough decision facing Sony.
No offense, but I can’t imagine a more boring movie. I’m somewhat of a Tour fan but I’ve seen this guy talk and he puts me to sleep!
And, weird, what’s that deadline all about?
Oh please! There have been allegations for years in the cycling community, long before the media and the authorities ever picked it up, that Armostrong was doping. He was. That doesn’t mean, by the way, that he isn’t an extremely talented cyclist. It just means that he’s an extremely talented cyclist who is also a cheat and, for that reason, a fraud.
How many times do we have to see this theme played out in sports, in hollywood, in politics? And there’s always two camps: one that still loves/reveres the person dispite what they have done and others who can no longer see them in the same light. And so, as we are seeing with this, there are many who could care less if he is guilty of doping (and therefore lied about it loudly and often. They feel it takes nothing away from him. And that leaves just as many on the other side scratching their heads…
Are you kidding? Hollywood has a long history of making philosophical heroes out of people whose veracity is, shall we say, in doubt. The artist who was ahead of his time — the musician whose vision was stifled by conformity — the doctor whose medical breakthroughs were opposed — the crusader who was celebrated only in death. NBC and Robert Saudek Associates got two seasons out of it in the middle 60s called “Profiles in Courage” based on the book credited to JFK. But how many bicycle moves can you name besides “Breaking Away,” “The Bicycle Thief,” and the end of “ET”?
Don’t forget:
“American Flyers” with Kevin Costner
“Quicksilver” (re: bike messengers) with Kevin Bacon
“The Triplets of Belleville” (specifically, the TdF)
“A Sunday in Hell” and “Stars & Watercarriers”
“Key Exchange” (I used to watch this all the time on cable)
And, of course, “Pee Wee’s Big Adventure”!
Also, what about the new Joseph Gordon-Levitt film in theaters now.
You forgot “Breaking Away”
Oops, no he didn’t…
Did he really never fail a drug test or did the Tour de France organizers just look the other way? I remember watching every Tour that Armstrong won because it was great to see him win. Now the race just isn’t all that exciting with Armstrong gone.
I don’t know if the Tour de France organizers looked the other way around, but one of the acusation is that Lance gave a donation to UCI to cover up one failed drug test from 2001. It seems to be a big conspiration, not just dopping, but corruption also.
According to news reports, over the years he has had several tests that were “in dispute” but were never followed up. For example, he was able in one instance to provide a doctor’s certificate for a banned cortizoid compound after the test which was accepted (although the usual protocol is to present a doctor’s certificate prior to a race for a banned substance).
My honest opinion is that doping doesn’t matter, because most pro athletes do it. It’s probably impossible to remain on top for year after year, when your body is tearing up and going downhill, without doing drugs. Does it really matter? It’s his body, he can do what he wants with it. I really think all this steroid hoopla is totally stupid. Who cares? With all that money and glory at stake, why would people think athletes won’t do whatever they need to do to win? And if they do, then so what?
But only if it’s putting a bad image on him. This cheater should either be ridiculized or forgotten.
ALLEGATIONS don’t prove guilt? Sure. And if Woodw and Bers hadn’t come after Nixon; hadn’t of stood their ground against harrassment by White House odfficials; the Justice Dept., etc., etc., a President wouldn’t have resigned in disgrace. Appearing in a court of law before a jury of his peers? No.
Then, why’d Nixon run away with his tail between his legs.
Armstrong…all these witnesses can’t all be bad; on the take; have a personal vendetta against you.
Give it up. Hope your investments are solid.
This is how history’ll remember you.
Funny how people are calling him a cheat, yet have produced NO PROOF to back that up. He’s passed hundreds of drug tests. Until someone comes up with a positive drug test, Ill take the word of the hundreds of clear drug tests over those who wish to label him guilty.
If some of you think he’s guilty,then show proof.
What was the evidence again (besides opinion) that he was on dope while cycling?
I am completely saddened by this news. Lance is and forever will be a champion. Nobody can take that away from him!
It’s impossible for me to believe that a fighter and ferocious competitor like Lance would give in and be stripped of his 7 Tour titles and be banned for life from bicycling if he wasn’t guilty as sin. He beat cancer, but this inquiry is too tough? Nonsense. The time to do the movie was 6 or 7 years ago. The story no longer inspires. Lance is now just another doper.
“So I raise the question: Did Hollywood miss its chance to tell a fascinating hero’s story?”
“Hero”?
It’s now heroic to cheat and lie?
One of the reasons the film may never have been made is that no studio would want to risk millions to produce a movie and get set to release it only to have what happened last occur.
Maybe Lance can set up a Cheaters support group with Roger Clemens, the South Korean, Chinese & Indonesian badmitten Olympians, Rosie Ruiz, Barry Bonds, East German female swimmers and the like.
I think that people are reading the headlines and jumping to conclusions. Lance has not admitted guilt; to the contrary, he has maintained his innocence. What he has said is that he refuses to recognize the authority of the USADA and questioned its process as unconstitutional and unfair. And he is absolutely right. In his case, they have gone beyond their scope and bent thier own rules in order to pursue a case against him that is very quesionable. The major International cycling organizations support Lance in his objection to the USADA investigation, which seems to be more about satisying the ambitions of that organizations CEO than doing anything to help the sport of cycling.
Well USADA says that Armstrong bribbed the International Cycling Union. So of course that they don’t want this investigation to go further.
What Armstrong did means that he doesn’t want that the truth to come out. If that happens then some test will be retaken and from what is leaking it seems that dozens of them are pozitive and proofs that he doped, also he doesn’t want that the bribbery claims to be further investigated.
In other words he just wants to retain some naive fans with this strategy: he’s innocent until proven guilty.
He basically says: Ok give me the punishment, but don’t digg further, I accept the penalty, but I wasn’t caught.
I believe Sergiu hit the nail on the head. Just wait. Lance knows something we don’t–and if he just ends it now his hope is it won’t come out. I believe that innocent people don’t make long winded excuses blaming everyone else under the sun as to why they won’t fight to prove their innocence. Especially THIS guy–his arrogance and ego would NEVER let him make this announcement unless he knew that he was going to be facing something pretty damning down the road.