Sony Pictures for years was developing a Lance Armstrong biopic. Tonight that story received an ignoble ending. The celebrated athlete will be stripped Friday of his 7 Tour de France titles and banned from cycling for life by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency. So I raise the question: Did Hollywood miss its chance to tell a fascinating hero’s story? Or is there now an even more complex and interesting saga? Tonight, in his statement, Lance stressed that he decided to stop fighting the USADA investigation into whether he doped not because of new incriminating evidence but because he was up against a deadline. This was the last night he could decide to keep trying to prove his innocence. In a statement he described the USADA investigation as an “unconstitutional witch hunt” especially after the U.S. Justice Department conducted its own probe and took no action. Tonight’s ending is not neat and tidy: rather, it’s messy and sad. It also should be a movie, albeit a different one from first envisioned.
As a huge TdF fan myself, I think what happened to Armstrong tonight is tragic. I also thought a Lance biopic was a natural back in 2006. So why did it take Hollywood so long to put one together? Billy Gerber, the former Warner Bros President turned film producer, tried to sell it years ago after reading Armstrong’s bestselling book It’s Not About The Bike. fast forward, and producers Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy got lucky that then Columbia Pictures president of production Matt Tolmach was a cycling fanatic. (He could do some of those Tour De France-type climbs — though not as fast.) Tolmach knew that Armstrong’s unhappy youth, his sports prowess first as a triathlete and then as a cyclist, his cancer battle, his Live Strong yellow wristband campaign, his cancer foundation, his epic seven TdF titles, his cycling rivalries, his love-hate relationship with the Frenchand the sport of cycling, and his battle against doping accusations, made a heckuva tale. So Sony Pictures quietly moved forward with the project.
Immediately Armstrong and Sony got lucky: then Oscar nominee Jake Gyllenhaal wanted to star. There was a slight resemblance between the two guys, and the actor is even a long-time cyclist. He’d even begun training for the film. The European press went into a speculation frenzy when Lance and Jake first showed up together at the 2006 TdF. (Jake even joined the seven-time TdF winner in the Discovery team car for an Individual Time Trial.) Armstrong, his agent Bill Stapleton, Discovery sports manager Johan Bruyneel, and Tour de France Directors Jean Marie Blanc and Christian Prudhomme all had what insiders at the time called “a heart-to-heart discussion” aboard the Discovery bus about whether the Tour would block the project. Obviously the Tour’s assistance, while not required, would have been helpful to the biopic. Gyllenhaal and Armstrong became pals during Jake’s method process to get to know the sports legend.
And, as the many years of doping whispers became louder, the project suddenly went quiet. Now it’s time to resurrect it with a different arc.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


This article is about the prospects for the bio-pic. It is not a cheap movie to make. There is a risk until the story plays out to the end. USADA had to move now because of statute of limitations.
But the story is not over. The UCI, with whom Lance has a strong relationship, can still appeal to the international CAS. My understanding is that only then will the “legal” case be over. That or if Armstrong changes his story. Remember what he has said, “I have never failed a control.” This is not inconsistent with admitting to a doctor that you took something early in your career or as an amateur, which is the only fragment of ‘evidence’ from a credible source (Frankie A). As the rules governing banned substances have evolved over Lance’s career, it is entirely possible that he used substances that were legal at the time, but that would be embarrassing to admit in light of present regulation. He is supposed to be protected from persecution for this by the rule against ex-post facto laws. At least in a legitimate American court.
However, it is unfortunate that ambitious lawyers make their names by destroying hard earned reputations. More unfortunate that the USADA exists at all – it has to find doping to justify its existence. Worse yet, it is ridiculous that the USADA creates its own kangaroo court – outside the mainstream legal system. The Feds could not come up with a case that would stand up in court, they dropped it. Only in a shadowy system run by people whose careers are based on attacking athletes, where the prosecutor effectively is the judge could they succeed in cornering Lance. Sounds un-American to me.
Covering the full saga may prove impossible in a feature film format. Perhaps Sony will team with an HBO to give the story more breathing room.
Depends on what happens next. But Joe makes an interesting point. Sometimes genuine winners are boring. Remember the stuff McEnroe used to say about Ivan Lendl? And while the “triumph over adversity” narrative is a staple of fiction and of non-fiction in hindsight – to contrive it in real time (if the conclusions are correct)would be disturbing and outrageous. That’s what was great about “Moneyball.” It was about two guys (an unlikely “buddy picture!”) who used study and statistics in order to put the heart back into baseball that fame and money took out over an extended period of time. I think this is the reason the movie (and the book I guess which I didn’t read) struck such a national chord. It resonated.
I just think they have something to prove. if he has passed the tests why can’t they just stop and admit this guy was the best at what he did at that time. they will not be happy until they bring him down and I can’t blame him. he has fought cancer and won..he is undoubtedly very strong. he doesn’t need to waste the rest of his life trying to prove to these &^%$holes. And if this sport is filled with dopers then lets just strip everyones title and be done with it….if it doesn’t fit you must acquit…leave the guy alone. I believe in him….
I’ve read several comments on several news sites and the same misinformation or lack of information seems to proliferate.
USADA stated that in addition to witness statements, they also had a blood sample that tested positive. They keep samples of athletes for years after the initial testing as an acknowledgment that athletes are way ahead of the current testing protocols. Athletes know the current protocols that are used and will use either new cheating methods or new substances that bypass the existing protocols. So keeping the samples on file while new protocols are developed gives USADA the edge around those who cheat in the present.
Perhaps the rewrites of the Lance Armstrong movie could use him as the anti-hero in the race to cheat the current protocols and USADA’s race to get the cheaters.
Lemay – the blood sample that “tested positive” is in dispute. Armstrong was tested 24/7 for years during the time he was racing, with no evidence. He was hounded, persecuted and they even insisted on testing him when his wife was going into labor and had to go to the hospital. He just was investigated for two years by the international agencies and cleared of any wrongdoing. It totally took over his life, as he says in a recent article. Now he’s supposed to go into arbitration for many more years and spend how much more money? All because a couple guys who actually were found guilty of cheating say that Armstrong was doping (with no evidence)? And all because the USADA is on a “Salem Witch Hunt” to find Armstrong guilty at any cost, while we pay that agency with our taxpayer dollars. Insane. Who’s next? Michael Phelps? Missy Franklin? 15-year-old Katie Ledecky?
The usada has no authority to strip the tour titles from Lance. The writer should get their facts in order. Only the international cycling union can strip a tour win from a rider. The usada can make a recommendation to the uci but since the uci has already directed the usada to cease and decist it’s investigation an prosecution of lance I doubt they will act on the usada’s recommendation
Oh, I’m sure it’ll get made, but not necessarily for the big screen. This could show up as a lower budget cable movie, perhaps for ESPN, Outdoor Network, etc.
I don’t doubt Armstrong’s courage in battling cancer, but he is certainly not alone in doing so.
You people are failing to see that LA has never ever failed a drug test and this ban from USADA is based solely in “witness” testimony. USADA has not named all witnesses (hear-say) and some of the named witnesess have carachters that can easily be attacked. I sure hope we are not convicting people with an “I said-she said” system!! What happened to the constitutional right of innocent until proven guilty?? LA has not been proven guilty! USADA ceo what’s his name has clearly ulterior motives.
You people are failing to see that LA has never ever failed a drug test and this ban from USADA is based solely in “witness” testimony. USADA has not named all witnesses (hear-say) and some of the named witnesess have carachters that can easily be attacked. I sure hope we are not convicting people with an “I said-she said” system!! What happened to the constitutional right of innocent until proven guilty?? LA has not been proven guilty! USADA ceo what’s his name has clearly ulterior motives.
This seems like a vendetta from the head of USADA who seems to have a serious hate-on for Armstrong. The other members of his team hate him too, I’ve heard he’s a prickly sort but that doesn’t mean he’s a cheat.
I think he reached the point after 13 years of harassment that he was just done with the USADA, who would never stop attacking. He doesn’t have unlimited time and money to fight charges over and over.
And if I’m wrong and he did cheat? Then he did what every other rider did, except they didn’t win 7 times. And how many of them came back from a devastating cancer treatment?
Gord-If I am hearing you right, then, by your last paragraph, Lance is the ONLY rider NOT guilty of doping. Since, as you say, ALL the other rider DO dope. Thats the stupidest comment I have read yet.
In my opinion, Sergiu gave the most accurate explanation. In addition, if Armstrong had met the deadline and continued his denials, 10 of his former teamates were scheduled to testify against his denials of doping. Realizing his ship was going down and a depth charge was about to sink it rapidly, he did the only thing a scared rabbit can do. Drop down a hole or be devoured. He chose to drop down a hole. I believe by so doing he has stirred up enough interest that his story will still be told and “it ain’t gonna be pretty”.
It is sad, the person who has defeated deadly cancer is now under scrutiny that too after a long time, and taking all the titles can not snatch the time he had already spent in glory, so disgusting.
You cannot convict someone without HARD evidence, there is none so get over it people.
Lance is a great sports fugure who played by the book and has never been proven guilty for doping in too many times to count. Now because he is done with it and says I am over it and retired they want to discredit him and his records. Bull crap Lance…stay your guns…we know who is the greatest athlete in biking! The people know!
This has the makings of a great film I can see it now, Aaron Sorkin writing, David Fincher directing, the rise of a hero who beat cancer and his tragic fall from adoration. Doping, friendship, betrayal, cycling.. this story has everything! Please let it be made one day! Daniel Day Lewis can play Lance Armstrong, “I’VE ABANDONED MY EPO!”, “I DRINK YOUR BLOOD TRANSFUSION! I DRINK IT UP!!”
Hindsight is always 20/20. That said, it’s hilarious to read all the Armstrong defenders who said he didn’t cheat. Especially after the Oprah interview
No problem, now the “movie” turns into a movie, about how (midway through) a hero biopic movie was ready to break ON the day of Oprah’s Interview. Take it from there. Oh well, now you know why I don’t make movies.