The News International British publishing subsidiary acknowledged today that the company is aware that London police are considering whether to file charges against its board over phone hacking at the shuttered News of the World tabloid, Bloomberg reported. Prosecutors are advising the Metropolitan Police Service on possible corporate offenses. News International said deputy assistant police commissioner Sue Akers, who is leading the probe, had referred to possible corporate offenses but also “that she agreed that the current senior management and corporate approach at News International has been to assist and come clean,” News International said in a statement. Some 60 people have been arrested so far including former News International CEO Rebekah Brooks and News of the World editor Andy Coulson, who later served as an adviser to U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron. Even if company officers could face criminal charges, prosecutors would have to prove that anyone charged was aware of wrongdoing.
Related:
Rupert Murdoch Resigns As Director Of News International
James Murdoch Completes His Exit From News Corp’s UK Newspaper Operations


How can you analyze if anyone was aware of wrongdoing until you file the charges? Even if the evidence thus far is circumstantial, unless you file charges, a referendum on the active PREMEDITATION OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL can never ensue. If, as Mitt Romney and American law insists, corporations are individuals – why would you not – file charges against “the individual-” in this insistence it’s THE SUBSIDIARY…who’s “the individual.”
The subsidiary is an individual…until it’s in legal hot water this would be. Oh no, then it’s a company. And none of its employees were aware of a thing. Ain’t that right guys?