
EXCLUSIVE: Paramount Pictures has confirmed to me that it is near a deal with Christopher McQuarrie to adapt Tom Clancy’s 1993 novel Without Remorse, with an eye toward directing the film. I’d revealed last week that this was looking real and that Paramount wanted to stay in the McQuarrie business after the job he did adapting and directing Lee Child’s Jack Reacher with Tom Cruise, which the studio co-financed with Skydance. Paramount has high hopes that McQuarrie and Cruise have launched a new tough guy franchise with the Reacher bestsellers, and there is certainly that possibility in Without Remorse. But though the book first–a spinoff to Clancy’s Jack Ryan series–sold to Savoy Pictures back in 1993 for $2.5 million, it has proven to be a very difficult book to adapt, even though its protagonist was the basis for the operative Clark played memorably by Willem Dafoe in Clear and Present Danger. Paramount tried a couple of times to get it going, but the problem has been an incredibly bleak and violent storyline that McQuarrie will have to find a way to brighten if this is going to work. That effort has already been well underway through script work done by Shawn Ryan, creator of the seminal FX crime drama The Shield. Skydance, which is cofinancing the Jack Ryan series, is also partnered with Paramount on Without Remorse.
John Kelly (his real name before he was called Clark) is coming off a soul-shaking tragedy. Kelly’s pregnant wife has died in a traffic accident. Shell-shocked, Kelly finds his bearings after he picks up a young female hitchhiker, a prostitute on the run from brutal employers who were using her as a drug mule. He helps Pam off drugs and falls in love with her, and they try to bring down the drug lords who are exploiting other girls in similar fashion. Kelly screws up though, and it ends with him shot up and his girl kidnapped, gang-raped and murdered. And then–with a brief detour in which the former Vietnam vet leads an attempt to rescue 20 American pilots from a prison camp in North Vietnam in 1970 before they are fed to the Soviets–Kelly goes into full Man On Fire mode, systematically exterminating the entire gang and any pimp who ever crossed the dead woman’s path. Whereas Denzel Washington’s Creasy character found redemption at the end of his spasm of violence through the young kidnapped girl in Man On Fire, Kelly’s lifeline is mostly being recruited and offered a lifeline by Ryan’s CIA overboss Admiral Greer.
In this age of The Avengers, there are great character cross-pollination opportunities between the Clark and Ryan films, but McQuarrie’s job won’t be easy. The Ryan film has Chris Pine set with Ken Branagh directing and playing the villain, with an offer out to Kevin Costner to play Ryan’s main CIA liaison, a role that could certainly be carried over to the Without Remorse film if Costner accepts it. McQuarrie’s repped by CAA, Key Creatives and attorney David Fox. Below is a trailer for Jack Reacher:


I love Tom but there’s almost no testosterone in his voice…. oh, and he’s 4 foot three.
Tom Cruise is TOTALLY wrong for the role. Jack Reacher intimidates with size(it makes him who he is)and very little attitude. He just does it. He rarely drives a car and there are never flying cars and ridiculous stunts. Reacher is real and Cruise is not even close. He does try, but Reacher is just not him.
A great book character reduced to a hollywood stars ego. A shame. It will probably detract from book sales. I know I can’t get the image of Cruise out of my head.
Too bad.
“Clark played memorably by Willem Dafoe in Clear and Present Danger”
Give me a break!!! He stunk in that role. If people read the Tom Clancy books theyd find that John Clark is not like that and he sure wasn’t a mercenary like he was portrayed in the movie.
What happened to the Shawn Ryan version of this script? That was supposed to be great. Is McQuarrie rewriting that or starting from scratch?
Stop with the Clancy worship. Enough already. There are a dozen authors who have better books that can be adapted and turned into new franchises.
Hollywood has you thinking action stars have to be 6’5 now. Shame,
No, I don’t think actions stars have to be 6’5. But I KNOW that Jack Reacher is much much taller than Cruise.
Having been through film school with a Masters in Screenwriting; countless days and nights in the editing room, making student films in order to become a better screenwriter; and double that time, and much more, in front of the keyboard; I can tell you one thing if nothing else — IT IS NOT TOUGH to take a bleak and violent storyline and make it…easier to digest.
The great screenwriters of the 1930s and 19402 did it all the time. And the majority of them didn’t even finish high school, or colleges and not one went to graduate film school.
Bottom line…it’s not that tough for McQuarrie to do this job correctly that he’s getting so damn much money for. Now, whether you are for his laments about how TOUGH this is — adapting a novel — or you add to it to try and show your absolute knowledge of the inner workings of Hollywood is up to you. Neither one of you are trying to cure cancer.
I read this years ago, and I always wanted to see this made into a movie. It’s a very good book, and if they can work with the tone a bit, it would make a great movie.
And Clark is NOTHING like Defoe’s version of the character. Liev Schreiber had it closer in the ben affleck movie
for those complaining about Mr Cruise’s size compared to the book…
In the original book Mr Reacher is described as the size of “a linebacker” at approx 6’5″ 210 pounds … which in terms of the modern NFL would be laughably small. Of course, over the decades of the books, Mr Reacher has (without the use of steroids or working out *yeah,right*) bulked up to the stanozolol-age freakshow of modern chemistry, a d-bol fueled 250 pounds “with virtually no fat” – which would be at least 4 inches taller and nearly as muscular as Arnold Schwarzenegger … again, without ever working out…
I’ll take Artistic License for 800, Alex
I just read the latest Jack Reacher book – which is actually the case that led to his leaving the army, so call it an origin story – and even though I knew Cruise was playing the character in the film, I could only see Stephen Lang in my head.
That doesn’t bode well for the movie (which I’ll undoubtedly have to see for review purposes).
Clark’s best line (don’t recall which Clancy book), after questioning a terrorist about a nuclear bomb on US soil – “It’s not which bone you break, it’s how you manipulate the bones after it is broken”. Clark is not soft, and softening him would seem to dilute the character. Without Remorse was his character’s background prior to joining the CIA.