Los Angeles (August 1, 2012) — SAG-AFTRA today received a new, national charter from the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations. SAG-AFTRA joins 55 other unions, comprising more than 12 million working men and women, under the AFL-CIO banner.
“With workers’ rights under attack nationwide, this charter represents a bright spot in the union movement and we are proud to add our new, unified voice in support of all workers in this country,” said SAG-AFTRA Co-President Roberta Reardon. “We are delighted to join with workers across the nation, and reaffirm the mission we share with the AFL-CIO: to ensure workers are treated fairly.”
“This is a terrific capstone to the historic merger of SAG and AFTRA and we are proud to receive a charter from America’s labor federation, the AFL-CIO, and we thank President Richard Trumka, Secretary-Treasurer Liz Shuler, Executive Vice President Arlene Holt Baker, and the members of the Executive Council,” said SAG-AFTRA Co-President Ken Howard. “This charter represents the start of a new chapter for our organization, facing new challenges in a changing entertainment and media landscape, but also presenting limitless opportunities.”
“Today the AFL-CIO celebrates a new charter for a newly created union, SAG-AFTRA, that brings together two great unions committed to changing to meet the needs of the future,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka. “The AFL-CIO commends the members and leaders for a process that gave every member a chance to weigh in — it’s union democracy at its best. I look forward to the continued leadership of SAG-AFTRA Co-Presidents Ken Howard and Roberta Reardon on the AFL-CIO Executive Council.”
“A lot of people don’t realize what SAG-AFTRA does,” said SAG-AFTRA National Executive Director David White. “As the union that represents the world’s most recognizable faces, it’s easy to forget that our main focus is to ensure that middle-class working performers are provided fair compensation and safe working conditions.
“Only a small fraction of our 165,000 members are high-profile stars, the rest are dedicated professionals who work hard to feed their families and pay their mortgages. As workers in any other industry, they deserve the rights and protections that only a labor union provides.”
The charter was presented at the morning session of the AFL-CIO Executive Council meeting in Washington, D.C., ushering in a new era for the union movement and the entertainment and media industries. It authorizes the new union “to conduct the affairs of said union in furtherance of the best interest of the AFL-CIO and of labor in general.” SAG and AFTRA received their first charters through the Associated Actors and Artistes of America in the mid-1930s. AFTRA received its direct charter on February 3, 2008.



welcome to the communist party comrade!!
Would anyone care to comment on exact knowledge of fraud, embezzlement, obstruction of justice, and violation of ERISA law regarding the current status of the former SAG’s existing pension fund?
There is a whistleblower suit pending regarding the former director, Bruce Dow, but the SAG-AFTRA merger is already shaping up as questionable.
Judge Otero, in the Sheen v SAG lawsuit, attempting to stop the merger vote due to lack of due diligence regarding the potential merger of the pension and health plans of SAG and AFTRA, denied stopping the vote, which was predictable, saying “SAG members have the right to make a decision that may turn out badly,” but he gave the go-ahead to discovery and depositions on the lack of due diligence claims regarding merging the plans.
The plaintiffs had no more money to proceed and therefore the case was closed. SAG and AFTRA had billions of dues payers money to fight off any challenge legally, which they did. Ironic.
But doesn’t Judge Otero confirming the due diligence argument as having enough merit to continue if the plaintiffs chose to, render the argument there could not have been any such due diligence before the merger, due to the 2 sets of trustees being separate legal bodies than the 2 unions, a moot point?
And what of the fact that David White, former SAG NED and current SAG-AFTRA NED, as well as Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, former SAG co-NED and general counsel, and current co-general counsel for SAG-AFTRA, as well as John McGuire, former “special advisor” to SAG (anybody know what that meant?), were, all three, both trustees of the SAG P&H Fund, as well as very highly paid members of SAG staff, represent a rather extreme conflict of interest?
This inclusion into the AFL-CIO is yet another predictable step in the post-merger landscape for SAG.
Does anyone reading this care to comment, anonymously if necessary, with first hand knowledge of fraud, theft, obstruction of justice and violation of ERISA law in the management of the SAG pension fund, which is now openly acknowledged as being in financial straits?
And that the pre-merger promises to SAG members that their pensions were “federally protected” was, in fact, a false statement? In the event of the SAG fund falling into the yellow or red zone or going bankrupt, the federal government, in fact, will not fully insure the current pensions of vested members, or the future ones of vested members. It can pay as little as cents on the dollar, and deny an actors choice to take his or her pension at the earlier retirement age of 55.
That could literally destroy the ongoing or planned retirements of thousands of SAG actors who painstakingly earned those pensions over many years.
It seems the SAG-AFTRA members are being herded towards the AFTRA pension plan, and there may, if fact, be no ’3rd plan” coming anytime soon.
The recent SAG-AFTRA music video contract, SAG-AFTRA’s first, did just that, removing contributions to the SAG plan, and sending 100% of them, to AFTRA, regardless of the wishes of the member. That obviously hurts the SAG plan.
And when spoken or written of, the proponents of the recent merger were quick to say the SAG plans serious losses (outside the allegations of illegality) were due to “market downturns and the loss of TV to AFTRA.”
But wasn’t it more a refusal to even attempt to protect the loss of SAG jurisdictional TV (“all scripted programming for television,” according to the NLRB) to AFTRA, rather than a “loss of TV to AFTRA” that led to such shocking losses and threats to the financial stability of the SAG plan, and its current disrepair?
Anyone with information or an informed opinion, pro or con this statement, can post here, and if Nikki allows the post to stand, they can retain anonymity while speaking truth to power.
Imagine.