The Evil Dead sequel is dead. A California federal court awarded Sam Raimi’s Renaissance Pictures a default judgment last week in its attempt to stop Awards Pictures from making an Evil Dead 4. In the four-page judgment (read it here), Judge Dale Fisher said that Awards Pictures are “permanently enjoined” from “using the EVIL DEAD name or mark or any derivation or colorable imitations thereof, or any name or mark that is confusingly similar thereto, including but not limited to the names Evil Dead; Evil Dead: Genesis of the Necronomicon; Evil Dead: Genesis of the Necronomicon, Part 2; Evil Dead: Consequences, (collectively, the “Prohibited Names”), as or as part of the title of a motion picture, television program, video game, play, book or any other form of entertainment provided or to be provided through any media, or in connection with the promotion, development, distribution, or production of any form of entertainment.” Renaissance, which was formed in 1979 by Raimi, Bruce Campbell and Robert Tapert for the original 1981 Evil Dead film, sued the little known Award Pictures back in early May for trademark infringement and a series of other related counts over the latter’s intention to produce an Evil Dead film of their own. Awards had claimed that Raimi, who is currently producing an Evil Dead reboot scheduled to come out next spring, abandoned the trademark when he publicly stated in 2000 that Renaissance would never do another Evil Deal sequel. In his ruling, Judge Fisher also stopped Awards from “doing any other acts or things calculated or likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public or to lead purchasers or consumers or investors into the belief that the products or services promoted, offered or sponsored by Defendant emanate from or originate with Plaintiff or its licensees.” A source close to the case says that the default judgment partially came because Awards Pictures never responded to the May filing. The company never even seemed to hire a lawyer for the case, claiming prohibitive costs. Renaissance were represented by Michael D. Roth of Los Angeles’ Caldwell Leslie & Proctor and Barbara Solomon of New York’s Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


Sam are you serious?
You’re ripping off H.P. Lovecraft by using the name Necronomicon.
MAY YOG SOTHOTH SWALLOW YOUR SOUL!
On Second thought,
The use of the name NECRONOMICON must belong to the Estate of HP Lovecraft, because it was published in 1924; a year after all of that author’s works that are public domain.
Therefore, Renaissance Pictures has likely infringed on the literary creation of HP LOVECRAFT, and probably owe the estates of Ethel Phillips Morrish and Edna Lewis; though Michael D. Roth would surely disagree.
How very strange.
There’s no denying Raimi got the IDEA from Lovecraft; however, the book in the EVIL DEAD films is SPECIFICALLY referred to as either “Necronomican Ex Mortis” or “The Book Of The Dead”. (And, of course, Lovecraft HIMSELF based the Necronomican on the HISTORICAL Egyptian document ALSO known as “The Book Of The Dead”.)
Raimi should have produced a real sequel with Bruce Campbell many years ago. Most people who liked the series would have loved to see Bruce return one last time as Ash. New Line wanted to do Ash vs. Freddy which would have been awesome. This reboot should at least have Bruce in it as the co-star he’ll probably do a cameo but it won’t be the same fun.
Well, there is a story that Lovecraft had access to a Masonic library in New England likely filled with Alchemical texts and esoteric literature. Though the Mad Arab’s Necronomicon is as original a text as they come.
Well I’m glad the case went Sam Raimi’s way. If Award pictures had won the suit, it would have meant that anyone who announced they had no plans to do any more sequels to a movie, were “surrendering” the rights to said property and that really makes no sense.
For example: Zemekis & Gale annouced that there would never be a 4th Back to the Future film. Using Awards logic, that should mean that anyone should now be able to make a new Back to the Future movie, regardless of what the actual rights owners think.
Not everything should have sequels.
As for Necronomicon – That word has fallen into common useage and has been used hundreds of times in movies, comics, books and TV shows. Sam Raimi doesn’t own that – but he does own the version of it as used in the Evil Dead Movies. In the movies, that book had a specific look, powers and plays a specified role in the movies mythos.
I guess what I’m saying is that The Renaissance petition could have been objected to based on the fact that Renaissance does not have the RIGHT to use Necronomicon in their title; and they shouldn’t.
Frankly the last thing anybody needed was some ripoff direct to video sequal of Evil Dead, so I’m glad Rami and co won this. However, also on the lst of “last things anybody needs’” is another reboot. I always shudder when I hear that word. How many reboots have actually been successful or even been worth watching? This year alone we’ve seen Conan, Footloose, Karate Kid, The Thing and more all of which stunk.
It seems they almost invariably wind up badly cast, CGI laden, horribly shot and just plain bad with only a handfull ever working out. Why not just do Evil Dead 4? Anyone seen Bruce Campbell lately? He could clearly still pull off the role and there are boatloads of ways to explain the aging between Army of Darkness and Evil Dead 4. For gods sake, spare us another “reboot” and just do it right.