My sources say longtime Los Angeles Times movie columnist Patrick Goldstein decided to take a buyout rather than work for the new leadership at the newspaper announced earlier this year. “He felt there was no more future for him there. It was obvious since all the new people think about is driving web traffic. They’re trying to put everyone to work doing that,” my source says. Wednesday’s edition of the LAT is Goldstein’s last column for that media outlet. No public announcement was made, and my source says about the lack of any explanation, “part of his going away deal is that he can’t disparage the new leadership”.
Goldstein’s thoughtful and knowledgeable and deeply sourced column appeared in the newspaper regularly and was one of the few remaining reasons left to read Calendar these days. But over the years he resisted many
attempts to turn him into a daily Internet reporter. His resignation follows Editor Davan Maharaj’s arrival and then a new entertainment editorial team announced June 20th. That was like moving deck chairs on the Titanic given that the newspaper has become lazy and irrelevant and its showbiz ads have fallen 25% every year as studio and theater chains abandon the publication.
Related: LA Times Business Editor Becoming Entertainment Czar
Related: LA Times Exits Longtime Showbiz Editor
Goldstein began writing “The Big Picture” back in 2000 but started on the newspaper first as a music freelancer and then Calendar staffer and eventually prestigious movie columnist. In 2007 he was the subject of an editorial flap when the paper’s then Calendar top dog killed one of his columns. In what now seems prescient, Goldstein told me at the time, “I love working at a newspaper, especially this one, but if we don’t start embracing change in a big way, there won’t be great jobs like the one I have much longer.”
As readers of Deadline Hollywood know (and can find in the archives), I’ve certainly had my differences of opinion and fact with Patrick, including several very public spats, but I greatly respect and admire him – even when he’s wrong. Here is simply what Goldstein wrote:
Since that first Charlie’s Angels column, I’ve written hundreds of columns. This is my last. I’ve blown plenty of calls. I’ve gotten too caught up in the emotion or hurly-burly of the moment, like when I wrote after 9/11 that Hollywood would forever embrace a new seriousness of purpose. (Hah!) But I hope I’ve gotten a few things right and even occasionally made a difference.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


A tremendous loss to our community and the entertainment industry. And yet another cavalier mis-step by the Los Angeles Times by their “no comment” and lack of response.
Patrick was one of a kind and nobody does it better…
OMG! WHAT A SHOCKER! I CAN’T BELIEVE IT!
This is so sad. Guess we are going to be subscribing the New York Times.
Although I will miss Goldstein, I still believe in the integrity and value of a daily such as the L.A. Times. In recent weeks they have featured many stories that didn’t see the light of day in other venues such as their mutli-day coverage of world overpopulation and local stories that no other publication would cover.
So, Goldstein is a loss, but I am a stalwart supporter of the L.A. Times and relish the daily delivery of their take on life.
nice to meet you, michele. i was wondering who their one last subscriber was.
Oh your comment is so spot on……The sunday New York Times is my paper of choice
First off, I am a supporter of newspapers–I started my career as a journalist. But at this point I keep my subscription to the LA Times just to have a placemat to put my put my cereal bowl on in the morning while I read the obits.
It’s terrible to see how the paper degenerated and devolved over the last 4-5 years. Patrick Goldstein was the shining light with well written perceptive feature articles. I must have missed this post yesterday, but I was pretty surprised at how cynical his column was this morning. Good luck to Mr. Goldstein!
This is a sad sad day. Patrick Goldstein’s voice is needed in the landscape of hollywood and entertainment, and I hope he lands someplace soon and very close. As a subscriber to the LA Times (yep, the actual pulp itself), I really looked forward to his columns. Didn’t always agree, but alway appreciated his voice in my living room.
Good luck Patrick.
Bummer, bummer, bummer!
Patrick Goldstein has been the number one reason for me being an L.A. Times subscriber. I have very much enjoyed his fair reporting on all things that are/were “Big Picture” related. If you read the L.A. Times and you care about the film business, you will definitely miss Goldstein’s musings. I damn sure will!
Bummer, bummer, bummer!
Nooo! I love Patrick. This is bullsh*t!
The LA Times used to be a must-read for me. A day wasn’t complete without that and a cup of coffee. Now I barely give it a second thought when I don’t get one. Or if I do I’m usually done within 10 minutes. Subscriber? As if! I stopped that years ago.
Bunch of scared, vision-less idiots running that place. Breaks my heart for the good journos left.
EXTRA, EXTRA! Newspaper has no use for columnist that writes own copy!…chooses not to join the .com scraping movement! Sooo sad, we’re on the road to having a million .coms, all delivering the same recycled content…suspect lat will focus on punchy headlines now? Patrick…only one place to go…Deadline!
How many times can you repeat the “rearranging the chairs on the Titanic” cliche? You’re killing me.
Patrick Goldstein…coming soon to Deadline. Watch.
I have known Patrick since he was my TA in film at Northwestern back in the late 70′s. He was no pushover and wrote some memorable and poignant stuff. In a certain way it’s the end of an era. I for one, will be curious to see what he does next and wish him the very best.
Nikki- hire him!
Interesting. I thought the Los Angeles Times stopped covering the entertainment business/company town in 1985.
In the old days the film companies would have pulled all their display ads to show displeasure with a newspaper. But I’m betting that the majors are smiling that there is now one less competent, well-connected person to call them on their blunders. The loss of Goldstein to the independent film community — and those who follow the commerce and history of film — is immeasurable.
Whatever! The Calendar hasn’t been the same since Michael Crichton dressed down Pat Morison at the Festival of Books
There is a certain irony to a non-copy-edited (sorry, Nikke, I love ya and your product, but … hiring a copy editor may not be a bad idea), breaking news, frequently PR-driven site made up primarily of former print journalists covering a story about a newspaper NOT covering the news that one of its only remaining ACTUAL journalists is leaving the industry.
There’s a real opportunity here for someone (hint, hint, Nikke) to bring some of the professionalism that USED to exist in newspapers to the Internet. Things like editorial vision (which you have here), an editorial chain-of-custody mentality (which you don’t — breaking news trumps being right or being polished), inquisitive and rational reporters who don’t accept canned statements as “news,” and an understanding of the industry that helps bring perspective to the editorial work.
In a few years, the world will tire of shoddy, half-a**ed, endlessly retreaded content and demand something noteworthy. Newspapers will have completely missed the boat and finally become extinct (a demise the industry itself caused and hastened), while the trades will have followed the misleading scent of money online completely, and while everyone continues the efforts to grab for a tiny bit of online cash, someone will miraculously, quietly discover that print — if done right — not only is still relevant, but that the model can be followed. It might not be a literal PRINT publication, but it will be very different from what exists online now.
Patrick, we will miss you. Don’t be gone long. Maybe you and certain others can establish a vision that can live.
(But here’s a hint: Studio marketing folks who think editorial drives advertising and vice versa have a limited world view. There are ways to cover the industry legitimately that don’t drive away advertisers. Since 28-year-old marketing junior execs never lived with the concept of a vigorous, free press, they think they can control every message … but ultimately, they need you more than you need them in the online world.)
Nikke, here’s hoping you can somehow nab him. And here’s also hoping that the world will soon rediscover how important, how revelatory, how meaningful a non-manipulated Fourth Estate (call it “Estate 4.1″) can be.
This is a huge loss to those of us who valued an unbiased and candid look at our business. Patrick has enlightened me, provoked me, and truly annoyed me but never bored me. Who is now going to take all of us to task for our follies and self-indulgences?
Dear LA Times…
I tuned out when you wanted people to start paying for that bland website drivel you try and pass off as “news” and/or journalism…
Please grow a freakin’ pair and try to attempt restoring some dignity to what was a great brand…
Just sayin…
Some readers may have drawn the quite false inference that Deadline Hollywood and Nikki Finke had a low opinion of Los Angeles Times columnist Patrick Goldstein. Terms such as “lunkhead”, “pathetic” and “nonexistent news sense”, plucked out of context, may have led some to the absolutely mistaken conclusion that Mr. Goldstein did not meet the high standards to which this publication holds Hollywood journalism. In fact, we have always believed that Mr. Goldstein is a consummate professional, a credit to his trade, a role model for all would-be entertainment reporters and a fine humanitarian. We apologize for any confusion and are happy to set the record straight.
Haven’t read the Calendar section or the rest of the garbage since the late 90′s
So, when is his first day at DHD?
Douchebag producers, stars, executives and their idiot minions all over town just heaved a collective sign of relief….one less truth-teller in the media. Good luck with your next chapter, Goldstine.
Good riddance. Patrick is an overrated, snide, bigoted, condescending jerk and, in my experience, little integrity in his profession.
I guess the good news for him is that he is free to go somewhere else to be an overrated, snide, bigoted, condescending jerk and, in my experience, little integrity in his profession.
Agreed- I could never understand his personal quest to remove below-the-line awards like cinematography, art direction, and film editing from the Acad Awards telecast. He believed that it was a TV show first and an awards ceremony second and was happy to screw the people who actually make the movie out of their one brief chance at recognition so that the movie stars could get more face time.
Am glad we’ll finally get a break from that next year.
I agree he was wrong on this but he tended to write very insightful articles. Certainly highly entertaining. This is a bad move by LA times not to work with him to keep him on board. Ominous sign for the newspaper.
Well put. It is remarkable that the Times continues to believe that the less they do the more they can be.
Patrick is a terrific reporter – smart, savvy, strongly opinionated: everything that makes informs readers and helps keep the industry on its toes. I hope he’ll turn up elsewhere, soon.
Here’s the thing about this that always gets me.
Nobody knows, or cares, who Davan Maharaj is. The readers certainly don’t. So, once again, the guy who people actually know, and read, leaves. And someone nobody’s ever heard of gets to move in and call the shots.
Here’s how this movie ends. (We know, because we’ve all seen this movie before.) Six months from now, or in less time than that, another somebody-noboyd’s-ever-heard-of will come in and replace the somebody-nobody’s-ever-heard-of who just moved in.
And media companies wonder why they’re losing their loyal customers.
LAT lost me when they blew out the view, and also (dagger in my heart) mr. boffo.