It’s been confirmed to me by a knowledgeable source that Terrence Malick will not be in Venice OR Toronto for screenings of his latest film, To The Wonder, which debuts Sunday on the Lido. While that’s not really such a wonder, the notoriously reclusive director did come to Cannes a little more than a year ago when Tree Of Life screened — and ultimately won the Palme d’Or. That year, people were practically taking bets on whether he’d show for the movies’s official launch. He didn’t come to the press conference at the time, it was said, because he wanted the film to speak for itself. True enough. If Malick had been there that would have been the story — Brad Pitt’s presence notwithstanding. But later that day in 2011, I sat down in Cannes president Gilles Jacob’s office for a chat and it turned out Malick had been keeping my seat warm for me. Jacob told me the director had just sat for two hours in the same chair as they discussed all and sundry. At the time, Jacob said the director would likely not do the Tree Of Life red carpet since he suffered from “extreme timidity.” However, Malick ended up making a split-second appearance in Cannes’ Lumière theater that night, it was reported at the time. Can we expect something similar for this festival circuit? As one person who knows Malick well put it to me today, “He’s full of mystery.”


Why is one of America’s and the world’s great artist – moviemaker – storyteller’s private life so fucking important?? If he shies from the spotlight; it’s for a good reason. Mainly…there’re too many idiots out there. leave him alone; quit bringing this issue up and let him do what he’s meant to do with his life — tell his stories on his terms. You don’t like them? Don’t see them. But bury this issue once and for all. he’s laughing at all of you…all the way to the bank. And cinematic history.
Reclusivity is over hyped. SCARED SHITlLISS is the problem. Really is there any reason whatsoever that he can’t just do the normal things expected. The commentary that he is odd, intense, difficult.. Jesus he says Action and Cut… He is not taking a tumor from a five year old child’s brain. And the actors that cave to his personna should check themselves into some forms of therapy. The idea that he get actors to perform like trained seals, and just for the experience to work with him is ludicrous. Why not just pay 500 dollars to a whip snapping prostitutie and have your fanny sting for 15 minutes. Please, stop patronizing this guy. You are feeding the the machine. BETTHEDUCK
Oh my god just stop having an opinion.
He’s the real deal. His work speaks not his twitter account.
Anyone who actually knows Terry knows why he didn’t make a movie for so many years. Don’t assume he is capable of doing the things that the public expects of him and most other directors.
Please, please, please be better than snooze of life.
The mystery is insecurity — we all got it. Especially in this town.
Genius.
Based on his first couple of films, Malick was something of a filmmaking hero of mine growing up. Flash-forward a couple decades; I get to design a one sheet for one of his movies. Everyone said he’d be a no-show at the cast-&-crew screening, but there he was, looking completely relaxed and at ease. Introduced by one of the producers, we talked for twenty minutes about 60′s-era sci-fi films (go figure). The man was so comfortable and unassuming that approximately two minutes into the conversation I forgot I was talking to “Terrence Malick.” Based on that sole encounter, my impression is that he’s a smart, witty, talented filmmaker who dislikes explaining his artistic choices, and doesn’t feel comfortable being the center of Mass Media-scale attention. At no point did I have the feeling he wanted to be mistaken for a brain surgeon.
Thing is, the Glenn Goulds of the world need to be cut a little slack. The “normal things expected” are not all that, when art is being made.
Trust the art, don’t bug the artist. Or something like that…
And the trend of media people misapplying the word “recluse” to people who avoid media appearances continues. Let me go ahead and clarify, a recluse is someone who shuts themselves off from the outside world, refusing to participate in society. It is not someone who directs films with famous actors, cameramen, and crew people, but who doesn’t like to be photographed or give interviews. The word for that is “shy.”
AMEN Andrew.
These days you’re considered a ‘recluse’ when you don’t have nude pictures of yourself on a facebook page.
It’s not like he’s hiding in a bunker somewhere with cans of soup – He’s got family, friends, normal life etc. Leave the guy alone. He doesn’t want to do interviews, so what?
Or “normal.”
‘Visually stunning’ –so they say.
Fact is, every moveimaker knows —-the visuals come about 4th
in importance.
FIRST is the script. Second the acting. Third the musical development and scoring.
—THEN the visuals. EVER wonder why the movies stink these days? -This is why.
Malick was pioneer for his time. Now—-? less impressed.
FINALLY, like all the post 70′s directors, even the best, he offers NO character
development, the scripts are nothing special except in, for their time, topic,
and the scores, while accomplished —-fail to stir or lodge in a compelling way.
Are you honestly saying that visuals are the 4th most important aspect in filmmaking, a visual medium? ‘Cause I’m gonna have to disagree with your police work there, my friend.
Another word for that could be “sensible”.
It is absolutely silly to claim there was no character development in The Tree of Life. Both Hunter McCracken/Sean Penn and Brad Pitt’s characters went through insanely moving metamorphasises (is that the plural?)
Is Malick supposed to be some sort of carny barker for his films, which aim to a spiritual goal? And perhaps he has a mild case of agoraphobia, which cripples Kim Basinger and may have affected her acting career? is it that important?
The word “recluse” implies that he was already obligated to share his life with the media, but is being stubborn. All those celebrity stories on TMZ, Hollywood Reporter, etc are full of ego and narcissism — people turning their lives into a “story” we can chomp down. Malick’s movies are about overcoming ego and looking at life as something more than just the words in our heads. See the connection?