South Dakota meat processor Beef Products Inc. alleges ABC erroneously reported that its beef product, dubbed “pink slime” by critics, was unsafe, not healthy and not even meat, costing it hundreds of millions of dollars in lost profits. The reports aired in March and April. Along with ABC, six people are named in the suit filed in a South Dakota state court, including ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer and reporters Jim Avila and David Kerley. Gerald Zirnstein, a former U.S. Department of Agriculture microbiologist, who appeared in the ABC reports also is named as a defendant. Zirnstein had used the term “pink slime” in a 2002 email to coworkers after touring a Beef Products plant. His email was later released to The New York Times. “The lawsuit is without merit,” Jeffrey Schneider, senior vice president of ABC News, a unit of Walt Disney Co, said in a statement released to several news organizations. “We will contest it vigorously.” Beef Products is seeking $1.2 billion in damages.


Isn’t this the same type of ridiculous lawsuit that was launched against Oprah Winfrey (and was lost) years ago? So Free Speech applies to all topics of discussion EXCEPT when it comes to the beef industry?
It’s free speech if it’s explicitly expressed as an opinion and not a fact. And if you present it as fact, you need some actual physical evidence.
I think if their suit gets thrown out or they lose, they should have to change their name to Beef-like Products.
Of course it’s a SLAPP suit. In a just world they will lose based on a qualification in the 1997 Food Lion suit against ABC in which the network lost but only because of its methods, not its accuracy. Besides, I just want to see ABC’s defense team demand that the executives of Beef Products, Inc. and their families belly up and eat a full meal of the stuff. How do you like your snotburger?