The Oscar winning actress denied in the strongest legal terms that she took key elements of a book on the Bosnian War for her 2011 film In The Land of Blood and Honey. “Defendants independently created the Motion Picture without any influence of Plaintiff’s Subject Work,” said Jolie, along with fellow defendants GK Films and distributor Film District, in a 13-page response (read it here) filed yesterday. “Defendants further deny that the protectible elements of the Motion Picture and the book entitled “The Soul Shattering” (“Subject Work”) are legally or substantially similar under controlling Ninth Circuit law,” the response also says. James J. Braddock sued Jolie and the others, on December 2, 2011 for copyright infringement. Filing his suit three weeks before the film came out in America on December 23, 2011, the author accused Jolie and the companies of copying key elements of his 2007 book for In The Land of Blood and Honey.
Jolie, who both wrote and directed the film, has said she got the idea for the movie from her travels to the region as a U.N. Goodwill Ambassador and what she learned about the Bosnian War of the 1990s. This week, Jolie, GK Films and FilmDistrict’s lawyers made sure to point out what they said are differences between the film and the book. “Defendants admit that in the Motion Picture the main female character at times was a servant in a structure occupied by members of the Serbian military, but deny that she was ‘subject to continuous rape by soldiers and officers in the camp’ as alleged by Plaintiff. Defendants deny that the protectible elements of the Motion Picture and the Subject Work are legally or substantially similar under controlling Ninth Circuit authority,” said this week’s answer to Braddock’s complaint. The writer claims in that original filing that he met with producer Eric Sarkic in Sarajevo in 2007 and the two discussed making The Soul Shattering into a movie. In 2010 Braddock, whose real name is Josip Knežević, says he discovered that Sarkic was a producer on Jolie’s movie, prompting the sequence of events that lead to the lawsuit. The case was transferred from Illinois, where it was first filed, to California in early July of this year. With the defendants’ response, and its requisite request for costs, lawyer’s fees and further relief from the court, the case now heads towards the discovery phase. A phase that could take months more. Harrison J. Dossick and Christine M. Neuharth of L.A.’s Reed Smith represent Jolie, GK Films and FilmDistrict. Braddock is represented by Dariush G. Adli and Rasheed McWilliams of downtown’s Adli Law Group PC.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


This guy is FOS. I read his book and saw her film. Not even close. Since when do sour grapes dictate lawsuits? That guy hasn’t got a leg to stand on. He better get ready to pay up.
Good for her! Hope she counter-sues this freeloader for everything he’s worth. Braddock has been spreading libelous crap about Jolie and the film all over the net for over a year now.
This guy hasnt got a leg to stand on, basically espesially in war most scenarios would sound similar people, were raped during war, people did die, there were good and there were bad situations thats what WAR is he needs to stop this noncense I hope Jolie gets to Sue this guy good and proper. Fisrt you never hear about this guy and then hey presto as soon as some one has shone light on Serbia there he is trying to get some credit if he was that good how come no one has heard about him & his book.
Good for her go for it Angelina, I guess Serbia haven’t even heard about this dude.
Now you know that is not a correct statement—why would you post that? People only need to Google him to know the truth. You can be a good fan of Ms Jolie without being irresponsible.
The only things on the internet about this guy arise out of his law suit and things he himself has put on the internet all of which are recent. If he was such a name during the Bosnian war or the 20 years after how come NO ONE ever mentioned him. I mean no one. So Googling him now tells you nothing. Certainly not the “truth.”
Good for her
War is complex thing. Finally someone gets honey, but most of blood bath.
Could be interesting case. Let’s wait and see how the discorvery goes before we hang this guy out to dry.
The book’s heroine is a married mother of 3 and it’s not a love story at all. Unless you count the love between her and the husband who goes off to fight. That’s not what Jolie’s film is about. There are so many dissimilar plot and character points that this guy is really stretching. He also claims that his is a true story that he was told in which case I don’t now how he can claim a copyright in a plot that is about true events. There seems nothing unique about his story.
This guy just seems angry that his efforts to get his book made into a movie didn’t pan out. This type of extortion happens all the time fueled by greed and ego.