SUNDAY AM, 4TH UPDATE: Hollywood finally can celebrate better box
office which breaks a 5-week losing streak. Friday and Saturday overperformed for an ‘up’ weekend: $110M total moviegoing, which is +20% better than last year. And Sony Pictures has $66.2M – or 56% – of it. Saturday especially was an “absolutely huge moviegoing day, one we haven’t seen since July,” an executive told me. It was an especially big day for Amy Pascal and Jeff Blake with maybe the biggest ever #1 and #2 openings for a studio.
Columbia/Sony Animation’s Halloween funhouse Hotel Transylvania (3,349 theaters) got off to a monster start Friday and then soared +73% Saturday for $43M by end of Sunday. That weekend cume beat the record for the all-time September opening (shattering Sweet Home Alabama‘s decade-ago $35.6M though not adjusted for inflation or higher ticket prices or 3D’s premium). It’s also the highest grossing debut for Sony Pictures Animation. And it’s 2012′s biggest opening since The Dark Knight Rises. Pic also worked for audiences who gave it an ‘A-’ CinemaScore (‘A’ from females and kids under 18) to guarantee good word of mouth through the month. Sony is claiming Hotel Transylvania cost $85M but I know it cost $104M. Depending on its legs and international preformance, it should gross between $390M-$550M at the worldwide box office. Toon opened day and date in 4 territories including Mexico and Australia.
Bob Osher, president of Sony Pictures Digital Productions, and Michelle Raimo Kouyate, President of Production for Sony Pictures Animation, drove the development and production of Hotel Transylvania. Genndy Tartakovsky (Dexter’s Laboratory, Samurai Jack, Star Wars: Clone Wars, and Sym-Bionic Titan) directed for what’s his animated feature debut and also is uncredited for writing the story. Voice talent includes Adam Sandler, Selena Gomez, Andy Samberg, Kevin James, Fran Drescher, Steve Buscemi, David Spade, CeeLo Green and Molly Shannon. Marketing campaign had multiple spots during the London Olympics as well as a prime presence during summer TV talent show finales and Fall series’ premieres as well as on kids outlets. Promotions and integrations ran across 12 networks. There was an official social game on Facebook developed by Sony Pictures Interactive. The 2 stars with large social footprints, Adam Sandler and Selena Gomez, supported through their social channels. Pic had panel on animation day at Comic-Con where its spin on Dracula, Frankenstein, Murray the Mummy, and more were walk-about characters. The film’s official website let audiences made hotel reservations. There was a Red Carpet premiere at the Toronto Film Fest.
Meanwhile TriStar’s sci-fi actioner Looper (2,992 theaters) leaped to $21.5M. That’s the first time talented Joseph Gordon-Levitt officially opened a movie like a star – something his future self Bruce Willis used to do regularly years ago. Audiences gave it a ‘B’ CinemaScore (‘B+’ from males). Looper delivered an opening weekend audience that was 59% male and 70% aged 25 and older. Sony/TriStar, FilmDistrict, and Endgame Entertainment co-production with China’s DMG Entertainment are behind this Rian Johnson film. It opened during the Chinese National Holiday. The film went through some major changes to please the Chinese investor. The script was rewritten to take place 60 years into the future in China (instead of France) which has become the world’s largest superpower in the world. Also Chinese actress Xu Qing was added to the cast. All this helped Looper’s chance of premiering day and date in China.
But the major studios’ best per screen average ($15,550) on Friday belonged to Universal’s comedy Pitch Perfect which the studio platformed in just 335 theaters. Then this sleeper’s gross went up a big +20% from Friday to Saturday for an extraordinary 6th place in the Top 10. Studio can’t recall another pic pulling in a bigger $5.2M weekend playing in so few locations. The release pattern was too small to even warrant a CinemaScore. Universal execs really talked up this small sizzler in advance and pushed and promoted like crazy. Its unusual platform release in mostly college towns was intended to give its core audience an early chance to sample the film and push out word-of-mouth to a more general audience before Pitch Perfect expands into 2,800 theaters on October 5th. Developed at Universal, the pic’s $17M cost was co-financed with Paul Brooks’ Gold Circle Films. Brooks produced the film alongside Elizabeth Banks and Max Handelman for their Brownstone Productions company. Universal has worldwide distribution rights and opens October 4th in New Zealand and rolls out internationally beginning on October 10th. Studio claims it “fell in love” with pic from the script stage, culminating when execs say how strongly it played to audiences. Low-budget sleepers like this have huge profit potential - if marketing costs can be controlled. To that end, Uni hosted the most word-of-mouth screenings than for any film in the studio’s history: performing arts camps, colleges, and general market screenings as fall arrived. Social-media metrics began to outpace similar films at early stages on Facebook. Promos were on Spotify, Starmaker, SongPop, Pandora, Vevo. Uni even did a small early Sept 28th ‘debut’. (It was announced on Sept 6th accompanied by ticketing incentives with Fandango and MovieTickets.) Director Jason Moore (“Avenue Q” on Broadway), screenwriter Kay Cannon (30 Rock, New Girl), and auuthor Mickey Rapkin whose book inspired the film did a ton of press along with the cast anchored by Anna Kendrick and breakout star Rebel Wilson. They also shot a custom single-take lip dub promotional video for the MTV Video Music Awards that aired more than 15 times. The film also was promoted at 22 stops in the American Idol Live! Concert tour with trailer play and a spot running at intermission. Besides the usual TV ads, Pitch Perfect had an unusually long 4-week radio campaign in the top 20 markets and on Ryan Seacrest’s show.
Faring way worse is this weekend’s 4th newcomer Won’t Back Down (2,515 theaters) from Walden Media which is financed by right-wing media multibillionaire Phil Anschutz and also responsible for that pro-school privatization documentary Waiting For Superman. This time it’s another propaganda film masquerading as a drama about school reform – but it’s really an anti-teachers union polemic using classy stars Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis and Holly Hunter for cover. Anyway, the pic bombed with only a $1.1 weekend only good enough for 10th place despite receiving an ‘A-’ CinemaScore from its tiny audience. Fox has a deal to distribute Walden Media which 100% financed the pic and spent a fortune on TV ads. Director is Daniel Barnz, credited screenwriters Brin Hill and Daniel Barnz, producer Mark Johnson.
Here are updated Top Ten with order based on weekend estimates:
1. Hotel Transylvania 3D (Sony Animation) NEW [3,349 Runs] PG
Friday $11.0M, Saturday $19.0M, Weekend $43.0M
2. Looper (Film District/TriStar/Sony) NEW [2,992 Runs] R
Friday $6.8M, Saturday $8.8M, Weekend $21.3M
3. End Of Watch (Open Road) Week 2 [3,083 Runs] R
Friday $2.3M, Saturday $3.3M, Weekend $7.8M (-41%), Cume $25.9M
4. Trouble With The Curve (Warner Bros) Week 2 [3,212 Runs] PG13
Friday $2.3M, Saturday $3.3M, Weekend $7.5M (-38%), Cume $23.7M
5. House At End Of Street (Relativity) Week 2 [3,083 Runs] PG13
Friday $2.3M, Saturday $3.3M, Weekend $7.3M (-40%), Cume $22.4M
6. Pitch Perfect (Universal) NEW [335 Runs] PG
Friday $1.7M, Saturday $2.1M, Weekend $5.2M
7. Finding Nemo 3D (Pixar/Disney) Week 3 [2,639 Runs] G
Friday $1.0M, Saturday $1.8M, Weekend $3.9M, Cume $36.4M
8. Resident Evil 5 3D (Screen Gems/Sony) Week 3 [2,381 Runs] R
Friday $810K, Saturday $1.3M, Weekend $3.0M, Cume $38.7M
9. The Master (Weinstein Co) Week 3 [856 Runs] R
Friday $787K, Saturday $1.2M, Weekend $2.7M, Cume $9.6M
10. Won’t Back Down (Walden/Fox) NEW [2,515 Runs] PG
Friday $920K, Saturday $1.0M, Weekend $2.6M
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Looper like Life of Pi (can’t wait) is a unique film unlike just about any other film out there. Its nice to have something fresh to see. Perfect role for Bruce another fine performance by Gordon-Levitt.
Wow. Sandler’s movie is doing well. Given the middling reviews for this one and all the other turds he makes, I was hoping his b.o. #’s would keep trending downward.
Why would you hope that?
Looper will do over 20mil for sure. Hotel Transylvania will do over 40mil and play well all through the Halloween. I am calling it the biggest Sandler movie ever, over 200mil domestic.
Pulling a multiple of five on an animated film in just three more weekends during the school year would be remarkable and is highly unlikely. The film will have some very direct competition from Frankenweenie next weekend, and once Halloween weekend hits it will be dead in the water. Even if it has very good 35-40% week-to-week drops you’re looking at a final gross of about $160.
The worldwide total also seems very optimistic. This might be broad comedy, but the Halloween genre only plays well in Christian majority nations with a strong Halloween consumer culture. The U.S., Mexico, the rest of Latin America, and maybe a handful of European countries are really in play for Hotel Transylvania. Sony has also historically struggled a lot with its foreign distribution when the title doesn’t have “Spider-Man” in it. If it made $300 million worldwide I’d be surprised and call that a strong showing; I’m not sure how $390 million is the low-ball figure.
Any numbers on The Perks of Being a Wallflower yet?
That is amazing for Pitch Perfect.
I have not seen one commercial for “Won’t Back Down”. If only Fox took a page from the annoying marketing people at Progressive or Geico Insurance and gave us wall to wall commercials of the product they are selling – maybe people would show up to their movies, thanks to consumer awareness. This is how they screwed up the B.O. for this summer’s “Diary of a Wimpy Kid” sequel – other than it being wrongly released in the summer, they did not market it on television. I see they are now doing the same with “Taken 2″ – advertising heavily on Sportscenter and NFL games, but nowhere else…and it’s opening next week.
Wow–I saw a TON of tv ads here in L.A. However, it looked so cliched and tv-movie-ish I had no desire to see it.
What networks did you see them on, because I didn’t see one this week.
Sigh…I guess it’s to be expected that HOTEL TRANSYLVANIA (more fart jokes for kids) will outdo LOOPER (smart sci-fi for adults)…
Yay, Looper!
Wow. Pitch Perfect heading for a strong per screen average on only 335 screens.
How many screens is it on next weekend, I wonder?
2700
There are quite a few GOOD movies out right now. I thought Hotel Transylvania would’ve done much better than the estimated at end of weekend. I looks really good for an animation.
Why would Fox surrender “Won’t Back Down?” Film was really cheap to produce.
19 mil isn’t cheap. They’ll probably make their budget back after dvd’s, but I don’t expect anyone attached will receive a bonus off of this one.
I blame advertising, as I heard nothing about this film until critics started trashing it on Thursday.
I like the smiley icon for #8 Won’t Back Down. Despite being down don’t wear a frown. At my local Regal plex they’re playing on there largest RPX screen End of Watch while on a smaller screen they have Hotel Transylvania which is forecast to make $38M. When theatres book these movies don’t they have an inkling how these movies will perform ? Last week this same theatre had Dredd in RPX which bombed out big time.
$38 million for Hotel Transylvania? That would be the biggest September opening ever.
It’s really strange to see Sony counter programming itself (R rated sci-fi vs family friendly Hotel Transylvania).
What’s not so strange and is actually really good, the mostly solid numbers of Looper. Of course it deserved way more but after the abysmal opening of the very decent Dredd last week, I was really worried for this R rated sci-fi with positive internet / fanboy buzz. Great movie.
I really hope Hotel Transylvania’s estimate is wrong (although, given Nikki’s history, I know this is false hope). If that movie can make almost $40 million but Looper can’t break $20 million…well, I’ll be very disappointed in our country.
Coming in at smiley face, WON’T BACK DOWN.
“…but it’s really an anti-teachers union polemic using its classy stars Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis for cover…”
So classy they can’t read a script and realize it’s anti-union? Are Gyllenhall and Davis dumb or just greedy?
how is walden media still in business? Their lawyer CEO is a joke
I am super surprised about Hotel Transylvania, I guess its’ time families embraced an original animated film.
Too bad for Won’t Back Down, I really thought it had a chance at connecting with older audiences/families.
I hope the word-of-mouth on Looper is positive. It’s the best mainstream release of the year, hands-down, and possibly the best of the year. I’ll admit, I was a little misty at the conclusion.
We actually have Pitch Perfect on two screens in NH, but I believe I’ll wait until next weekend. I still need to see End of Watch and Arbitrage, plus catch a second showing of The Master.
I bet Looper does more than 20m. Saw it last night. Word of mouth will be great. Worldwide should be strong too, and I wonder if another territory like China could be even bigger. It’s great to see a mid sized indie play with the big boys.
Looper will not hit 20 mill. Dontbunderstandvtge gushing. It had a weak Friday.
And Dredd is officially dead. Such a shame; it’s very well done and a faithful adaptation of the source material (unlike that Stallone mess).
That’s an impressive Friday total for Transylvania. It will be interesting to see how that number gets magnified by the Sat-Sun matinee crowds that usually play such a substantial role in the weekend draws for that sort of movie.
I think Won’t Back Down might see a bump from the matinee audiences, too. (But probably not that much of one.) It will be intereting to see how that movie’s daily numbers will compare to Nemo through the weekend.
Look, I love JGL as much as the next person, but the movie is successful because of it’s ridiculously high RT score. Because it’s a good movie, and word of mouth travels. Reviews help a film in this day and age. Not ever film, but when you make a movie that has intelligence, people do notice.
There is no prestige left in working in the business anymore. Our relatives and friends back home make gawk and say great things, but when we’re not listening — or even when we are — they laugh at the shitty product we constantly put out. Some decent movies are still put out, but not by the studios. It’s a dying business.
While I kinda agree that JGL isn’t necessarily the reason for its solid debut, I’d say his 50/50 also had a crazy high RT score (As well as being another great movie).
Ah, the old doom and gloom about the quality of the product that always ignores that from the first days of film the majority of the product released was ALWAYS shit. The genres and methods of filming has changed but in the 30′s there were mediocre musicals and dramas all over the place. 50′s was horrid b-movie sci-fi. 70′s was rife with just horrid grindhouse and forgotten drama. The only reason you don’t remember it is simply because they were forgotten.
The quality is there if you look for it. Looper and Dredd are fantastic genre films. The Master is one of the best of the year. Perks of Being a Wallflower is good. Not to mention the great movies that have come out all year and are about to hit with Oscar season. And the independent films that come out are no great example of quality considering how many are released in a scant few theatres and then never heard from again.
The market is changing but it’s not dying.
The success of this film will be because of the ensemble of actors …and the directors unique vision and script.
JGL is a solid actor who always delivers a solid interesting performance. Not really a movie star who can open a movie though…Premium Rush as an example.
The # 1 movie this weekend had a TERRIBLE Rotten Tomato score and according to this article will make twice as much over the weekend.
PREMIUM RUSH was a really fun movie that Sony completely threw away. I saw it in an only half-full theater on opening weekend, but everyone who was there applauded when it was over, and you don’t get that often from a paying audience. Here’s hoping RUSH finds a bigger audience on video/streaming.
And no acknowledgment of Bruce Willis in the LOOPER discussion? Surely the fact that he’s finally back in a good action movie has something to do with its success. Casting Willis (the veteran) opposite JGL (the talented up-and-comer) was shrewd casting…
I agree. Especially since the money was Chinese, and they needed success there.
Joseph Gordon Levitt has done enough quality projects (that told good stories) in the past. When I see his face (or in Looper’s case ‘a version’ of his face) on the poster or in the trailer, I think to myself “Well this is probably going to be above average at least”. He isn’t the sole reason for the film’s success, but he’s a part of it. It’s not like when you see ads for a Robert DeNiro or Nicolas Cage movie nowadays and you think “Well this could go either way… but it will probably suck” (which is a tragedy. They were so great once!).
The movie star is dead. No longer can a person’s face (except Will Smith) guarantee an audience opening weekend. There are many great actors that deliver excellent performances over and over, but they can’t get butts in the seats. We’ve finally come to an age where the audience is there for the story. Thank God. Now, let’s continue to tell great (original) stories!
There will be less original stories. Producers need a hook to sell it on and now that “the movie star is dead!” that hook is familiar IP. This is already happening and even brain dead chimps can see it. Thank God indeed! Brain dead chimp. “Death of the movie star” is the worst thing to ever happen to original stories getting made.
Good. Rid the business of all the vapid fools and old-money charlatans who are in it for the prestige, and leave it to those for whom prestige is just a necessary evil of the creative process.
Stop saying “no unsolicited submissions” to every writer who doesn’t have a connect. You’re the ones who are supposed to find the talent. Prove you’re more than just some glorified B-minus English majors with patrician blood.
Watch what happens to the quality of the films. And then the charlatans will return, and around and around and around.
Pvt. Duke, you are clearly a failed screenwriter. Two things:
1) we’ll stop saying “no unsolicited submissions” when you morons stop the frivolous and expensive lawsuits. See http://www.deadline.com/2012/09/fox-entertainment-warner-bros-entertainment-get-past-life-copyright-suit-dismissed-david-hudgins/
2) if the script is good — and by that I mean something that someone is going to feel confident spending money to produce that an audience would be willing to pay to see — it WILL find its way into the right hands. Every time.
Stop bellyaching and write something someone outside of your grandma would want to see.
Exactly right. There are no great undiscovered manuscripts. Seriously. If its any good, it WILL be found.
How can you assess the quality of anything that is undiscovered?
It would be nice to think that point 2) (which has been made by others before) is true, but history doesn’t bear it out. In just my limited experience with the business, I’ve read a number of good, commercial scripts that never got made, and there have been plenty of good, commercial scripts that found their way into the wrong hands, who insisted they be rewritten to death and turned them into schlock.
Michael, you’re confirming the position. If it’s good, it will rise to the top of the heap, get read, possible bought and maybe even made. Whether it gets developed into the ground is a different issue. And whether it actually gets made is dependent on another entirely different set of considerations. In my experience (22 years, 14 movies produced personally, developed 30 as an executive) I have also read good, commercial scripts that haven’t gotten made or set up for a variety of reasons… but they were READ by people all over town, which also proves the point — the best material gets a shot.
A good script that gets read all over town may help the writer out financially, but if it’s not produced, it doesn’t help the audience or the industry overall.
Not a screenwriter. And I don’t know about balls, but it takes something to grow up in Beverly Hills and spend your life producing middling crap, only to state sans irony that the cream always rises to the top.
Most, if not all of the quality films you’ve ever been involved with were as an early-twenties development exec. Which isn’t to say that the productions didn’t benefit from having you loaf around in expensive suits saying “That’s great.”
I don’t even need to know who you are to know you produce a police procedural, which I’m sure you think is wholly original and not a personification of your career: assembly-line rubbish, completely indistinguishable from the next gilded turd.
Nice to see some original ideas getting attention rather than another cape movie.
Ha! Dumbest post ever!!!!!! You think anyone gives a shit about rotten tomatoes????! Just please jump into traffic and get a clue.
Yes! They do!
Minus the big event pictures, there have been MANY times I’ve been on the fence about a movie, in whether to see it in the theater or wait for video, and it’s score on Rotten Tomatoes was the deciding factor.
It’s a part of the process now.
If there’s a movie I’m on the fence about, I check RT
I do as well. It is part of my process for sure.
I’m the one who posted about RT.
Your comment is the comment one makes when they’re involved with Adam Sandler or Battle: LA type projects.
Smart people, though, do check RT. When I was in high school, I was getting sick of the TIMECOP type movies you end up going to group herd-wise, and I think at some point early in college I said to my friends, “Hey, let’s go to LEAVING LAS VEGAS. It’s getting good reviews.” My friends and I all saw it and we were like, Yeah, that was really cool.” 9 teenagers seeing an adult indie helps. It gets us talking to our friends, etc. And for adults, a lot of them do want to get out of the house and see a movie, which is why ARBITRAGE is doing so well. And when you hear/see one of the adult movies is supposed to be good, you go and see that particular one.
Really smart people check metacritic.com instead. Rather than simply apply “fresh” or “rotten” (which means a movie with 100 percent vaguely favorable reviews would get a higher score than a movie with 99 raves and one pan), it uses specific numeric scores for each review (based on star ratings, grades or overall impression) to come up with a more accurate aggregate score.
Thank you, Michael, for pointing out something I’ve had a problem with concerning how Rotten Tomatoes scores films. Often I’ve read a “fresh” review of a film only to find the review, while not an outright pan, is lukewarm about the film at best. Why should those reviews count as “fresh”? It makes the scoring of films suspect to me.
@michael
I dunno if checking metacritic makes you smart. Personally I like it better than RT but RT also has the type of accurate aggregate score you talk about – right next to the %
True, but it’s the “fresh/rotten” percentage that is highlighted, and that everyone pays attention to.