The celebrated author says that she may produce “director’s cut” versions of two of her Harry Potter novels, and doesn’t rule out additional books in that world — but without Harry. When it comes to the boy wizard’s story “I’m done,” she tells the BBC in an interview to promote her new novel for adults, The Casual Vacancy. “I just think it would be for the sake of milking it and that’s just not in me.” That includes a Potter prequel or sequel. “I’ve never seen it work well in either literature or film.” Nevertheless, she says that “if I did have a great idea for something else” in the universe she created then “I probably would do it.” She’s also mulling the possibility of tidying up some of her Potter novels that she believes “needed another year” of work. “There’s one towards the beginning and there’s one towards the end, that I definitely felt that about. I had to write on the run and there were times when it was really tough. And I read them, and I think ‘Oh God, maybe I’ll go back and do a director’s cut.’ I don’t know.”
Rowling also reiterated the concerns she raised last year against the possibly illegal tactics that UK tabloid reporters use to violate celebrities’ privacy. “I can’t put an invisibility cloaking device over my house, nor do I wish to,” she told a government inquiry into press behavior created following the hacking and bribery scandals at Rupert Murdoch’s papers including News Of The World. “I hope and pray [the investigation] does change things because I think it’s toxic, what has been allowed to go on.” But she adds that “there will be massive resistance on the part of some aspects of the media.”


Please let this be true..
I think a Potter prequel would still honor her commitment to “No more Harry”. She could write a trilogy on his parent’s time at Hogwarts, then have it lead up to Harry’s birth. I don’t think a sequel would work, since how could you top Harry?
She should invent a new franchise instead of going back to the Potter well–let’s see what she’s really got.
The story of Harry’s parents is complete. They were merely plot elements and they served their purpose well. I think it would cheapen the series to base a trilogy or even a one-off about them.
A new story set in the same universe doesn’t have to “top” Harry’s incredible journey. In face, it didn’t have to resemble his at all. The universe in which Harry exists has the potential to be as rich and diverse as King’s Dark Tower universe, or Prachett’s Discworld. I’d love to read something akin to that.
Look, first off – I enjoyed all the HP books.
But………
Director’s cuts of them is just plain old nonsense. The very problem of the later books was bloat. The last three at the very least don’t need more material and neither to the tighter (and better) earlier ones.
IMO anyway.
So, now the publishing world is entering the “director’s cut” arena? What, did she direct the movies, too, or just the novel? And, how do you direct a novel?
Oh, and “producing” director’s cut versions is not “for the sake of milking it”?
Lady, pull your head out of Harry’s butt and read your own words. But, then, after trying to read your Harry Potter novels, I’ve come to the conclusion that you never do.
And don’t worry about the media violating your privacy. You have nothing to say or do that would interest us.