Given how much Republicans hate Hollywood in general, and George Clooney in particular because of his Obama fundraising and Democratic Party activism, you’d think any associations would be radioactive to the GOP. Nope. Stuart Stevens is currently Mitt Romney‘s chief campaign strategist, chief campaign ad maker, and chief campaign speechwriter. And yet Stevens was the political consultant for Clooney’s 2011 political movie The Ides Of March and 2003 political TV show K Street. In fact, Stevens has many Hollywood connections: he was a UCLA Film School grad student, a one-time fellow with the American Film Institute, and a credited TV writer on Northern Exposure, I’ll Fly Away, and Commander In Chief (also a consultant producer — see below.)
Related:
George Clooney Appearance Raises $625K For Obama
George Clooney’s Record $15M Fundraiser For Obama
Stevens now has a bullseye on his back because of a new Politico article which is creating big buzz over the last 24 hours. It says Republicans are blaming Stevens for all the recent stumbles in Romney’s presidential campaign. It claims Stevens was responsible for the many rewrites to Romney’s RNC speech that left out mentions of Afghanistan or Al-Queda or troops serving in war zones. It also claims that Stevens arranged for Clint Eastwood’s rambling RNC speech with that chair. (Stevens ”loved the idea of the tough-talking American icon greeting the millions of viewers tuning in.”)
Stevens’ official bio stresses his Hollywood ties. It says he was “educated at the UCLA Film School and is also a former Fellow of the American Film Institute”. And that he’s “written extensively for network television including the Emmy Award winning CBS series, Northern Exposure, the critically acclaimed and Emmy Award winning NBC/PBS series, I’ll Fly Away, the NBC series Mr. Sterling about a U.S. Senator, and serving as Co-Producer on HBO’s original series K. Street, working with George Clooney and Steven Soderbergh, as well as Consulting Producer on ABC’s Emmy Award winning series, Commander in Chief about the first female President of the United States.”
Related: George Clooney Lends Voice To Obama Biopic At DNC
Most recently Stevens consulted on Clooney’s 2011 political film The Ides Of March whose Sony Pictures’ Blu-ray even contains a 7+ minute sit-down with Stevens about ‘What Does A Political Consultant Do?’ Clooney met Stevens while working with Soderbergh on the HBO political series K-Street. Clooney directed, produced, co-wrote, and stars in The Ides Of March and is quoted as saying that “Stuart was a really valuable voice. We would send him things and say, ‘Tell us where we’re going wrong. Tell us what you would do in this situation.’”
Stevens has been working on GOP presidential campaigns since 1996 (Bob Dole’s) and did both Dubya’s, and then switched from McCain’s to Romney’s. The DC-based media consultant is one-half of the Stevens & Schriefer Group as well as author of a book, The Big Enchilada, about the 2000 Gore-Bush campaign. Stevens helped put together that year’s GOP convention bio film introducing George W Bush to the nation. Stevens has said in interviews he’s a big fan of Charles Guggenheim’s Oscar-winning biopic on Bobby Kennedy shown during the 1968 convention, as well as Harry Thomason and Linda Bloodworth-Thomason’s The Man From Hope about Bill Clinton shown at the Democratic Convention in 1992. Very interesting, indeed.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.




The Emperor has no clothes. Republicans will make you think they despise Hollywood but they need their money & personalities no less then the Dems. It all comes down to the money.
But whose money is needed more has the most influence. That would be the Dems.
Republicans do NOT hate Hollywood – some Hollywood liberals hate Ruplicans. It’s that simple.
“Given how much Republicans hate Hollywood in general”
If they do, it’s because of statements like this.
I’d say it’s more likely because of all the hundreds of comments posted on the internet by Republicans saying how much they hate Hollywood. Just a guess.
The irony is just too much! All you have to do is read the comments here on any article that touches on politics or Fox News and you’ll see people posting about how much they hate Hollywood elites. And those people aren’t democrats.
Well the long knives are out aren’t they? I remember when that happened around this time in the McCain campaign. Maybe Romney ought to hire Sarah Palin to take Stevens’ place, you betcha that sounds like a perfect idea.
PS Republicans love the Hollywood that loves them back, they always have (Ronnie Reagan). They just hate that Hollywood films are the only thing we still manufacture here and our #1 export and yet we’re overwhelmingly liberal.
That’s laughable, Hollywood films are far from our #1 export (more like airplanes and petroleum products) also most films today are seemingly made in Canada with largely foreign casts. The lack of quality and idiocy of most of the products that Hollywood churns out is a cause for embarassment, not pride, not to metntion the negative image of America that the films create worldwide.
The main reason is probably the vapid, unintelligent actors and actresses who are paid millions to play make believe and live in a bubble, yet feel the need to spout off on political topics they know little about as if anyone respects their opinion!
But somehow Clint Eastwood is left out of the “vapid, unintelligent actors and actresses who are paid millions to play make believe and live in a bubble, yet feel the need to spout off on political topics they know little about ” generalization.
I don’t understand what the big deal is. I worked with Stevens on a TV show, he’s a political conservative from Mississippi who is friends with Karl Rove and also happens to be a writer. He is not a secret liberal, I can assure you of that. But he’s also not a guy who would let political differences get in the way of work or personal relationships (that’s the way most people used to be, if anyone remembers that time…). He was extremely valuable as a consultant and writer who knew the world of politics, and he didn’t push any political agenda. A great, smart and funny guy who liberals and conservatives alike enjoyed working with.
So why are they still using Stevens as the strategist? I think Mitt Romney has plenty of good sense himself and can find another to guide him.A MSNBC Morning Joe even summarized the way Obama has done little except add more government involvement in our society and Romney needs to point out what he would do to better for the economy and small businesses.Don’t just wait –it’s getting late and the debates may be too late,since people will be voting soon. Deny the lies they are saying about medicare and taxes that Romney will be doing.SPECIFICS!!!!!
We get it, you love Obama. I come here for television and movie talk, not politics.
There is only so much Stevens can do. Maybe he left out the Al Qaeda part because he didn’t to remind the viewers of Obamas role in ending bin Laden. Maybe he let Eastwood speak because he thought the idea of a conservative icon doing his thing, looked good on paper.
Going after the head strategist this late in the campaign is not helping Romney. What side are they on, really? Jeb Bush 2016?
DON’T Bore us! A guy like this is Romney’s downfall, which Hollywood obviously wants. Wake up Romney!! Find somebody who is sincere and has some integrity. There’s a thought- let integrity be your strategy. Let Hollywood play their usual, boring power games. Sick of ego and cynicism.
The suggestion that Stevens might be embedded as part of an elaborate re-elect Obama strategy is a FANTASTIC premise. Run with it, Clooney!
If you look at his GOP campaign record, it isn’t that good. Nearly all of the candidates lost…
oh this is so perfect: “new Politico article….says Republicans are blaming Stevens for all the recent stumbles in Romney’s presidential campaign.” So you mean there was no one in the campaign approving these speeches? Who might have, themselves, seen the obvious lack of what wasn’t addressed. Keep on blaming each other – “Divided they fall” works for me
You lost me at ‘Politico article’. They are doing everything they can to depress republican turnout. The negative drumbeat will continue 24/7 until the election in the hopes of making people feel it’s not worth leaving the house to vote.
Just like polls with 10-13% more democrat respondents, this is just another way the media is in the tank for their guy.
National polls ask more democrats because more people are registered democrats. It’s nothing but basic demographics. About 33% of Americans id as GOP, about 43% declare as Democrats, and the remaining 24% say they are Independent. How is that a conspiracy unless using the facts is a conspiracy.
The Manchurian Candidate done in by The Manchurian Strategist.
It’s my ubderstanding that Stevens was part of writing staff on “The West Wing” under Lawrence O’Brien (now of MSNBC)