Related: VENICE: P.T. Anderson On ‘The Master’, Scientology, & Screening It For Tom Cruise
A Venice Film Festival audience lined up starting at about 8 AM today to catch the first press screening of Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master. The packed house was hushed throughout the entirety of the film with only a handful of walkouts. Although immediate reaction following the screening was enormously positive, applause when the credits rolled was muted. After sitting through 2 hours of a gorgeous yet
emotionally grueling and difficult-to-decipher picture, folks say they’re still parsing the movie. As one industryite and self-professed fan of Anderson’s work said to me this morning, “I would have preferred if it moved from Point A to Point B, not because I’m illiterate about film or need signposts along the way, but it seems to keep circling around.” An across-the-board consensus, however, is that Joaquin Phoenix should earn a Best Actor Oscar nomination. His portrayal of a disturbed World War II veteran Navy man is disturbing itself for the masterful way he embodies such an enigmatic character.
The Weinstein Company releases The Master on September 14th in the U.S., and sneak screenings around the country have resulted in largely glowing reviews. Curiously, a scene that was part of one of the original trailers for The Master — in which Phoenix’s Freddie Quell screams at Philip Seymour Hoffman’s Lancaster Dodd, aka The Master: “I know you’re trying to calm me down, but just say something that’s true!” — was not in the version screened in Venice this morning. Nor was a scene in which Quell is being questioned about “an incident.”
Related: Hot Trailer: Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘The Master’
Anderson is known for operatic tales, whether set against the backdrop of the porn industry, the San Fernando Valley during a frog storm, or the Southern California oil boom. But this one will be a tougher sell to audiences not used to the director’s work. The movie has been regarded as a thinly-veiled treatise on Scientology, and someone who’s not heard all of the Scientology talk before seeing the film would immediately recognize references to it.
The film focuses largely on Phoenix’s shell-shocked, alcoholic and violence prone character – though one suspects he was shell-shocked long before the war. He stumbles across Philip Seymour Hoffman’s Lancaster Dodd, aka The Master, the affable if ominous leader of “The Cause,” who takes Quell under his wing and begins to “process” him. One person this morning told me Hoffman’s Dodd resembles a snake-oil salesman more than L Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology. Phoeniz and Hoffman engage in a pas-de-deux throughout the lush film almost erasing every other player – save Amy Adams who is compelling when on screen.


I’m going to see The Master at the Toronto Int’l Film Festival. I can’t wait to see this, but I’ll make sure to drink an espresso so I can be as alert as possible to fully comprehend this film’s anticipated genius.
I adore PTA’s work… and though it sounds like The Master is a bit clunky at times, I prefer a flawed Anderson movie to any other director’s flawless film.
To clarify, L. Ron Hubbard WAS the very definition a snake oil salesman. So comparing the two as different things shows a basic cluelessness about the man.
I was thinking the exact same thing. Didn’t get the attempt to differentiate the two at all.
PTA is so disingenuous about the Scientology thing, because he’s trying to avoid a public clash with them. I’ve read the script and of course it’s about Hubbard. Also, I’m a huge fan of Anderson but the script was a head-scratcher. I’ve a feeling this one will appeal to those who feel that incoherent is synonymous with great.
Incoherence is to greatness as lobsters are to nuclear fission.
I feel for Freddie’s character, from a distance (now). Unfocused, full of rage. This film is a fever dream. Sort of a dark cousin to Tree of Life.
Hubbard claimed Dianetics could cure 80% of all diseases, and he also claimed he could date a person’s life — one they lived a trillion years ago — to the nearest second.
Today, Tom Cruise claims Scientologists are the only ones who can help at a car accident and that they have all the answers. Seriously, it doesn’t get any more snake oily than Scientology.
All film critics should read the history of Scientology, in Russell Miller’s BAREFACED MESSIAH. It is free online (for download or reading online). It is almost certainly the book Anderson read, preparing to write the movie.
Looks lame.
Michael jevons, when someone pours their fucking heart and soul into a film that is trying to show us something we may not have seen before, you don’t say “Looks lame.” Such a casually ignorant response defines what is wrong with so many people. Even if you don’t want to see the movie and you have support for why you didn’t like it (if you had actually seen it) then your statement is still a representation of what a fucking clueless, pathetic individual you are. Don’t shrug off someone’s hard work with such a haphazard comment. You, sir, are a fucking idiot.
Really lookin’ forward to this movie.
Nice to have a REAL filmmaker still out there getting things done and not these amusement park directors like Wheedon, Spielberg and Abrams and the rest o’ the lot.
Amusement Park directors? If you mean directors that choose to entertain and thrill their audiences with good storytelling and not bore them to tears, I suppose they are.
As far as entertaining goes, I grant you that The Avengers was fairly good. But Spielberg’s and Abram’s latest films were pure pablum; infantile shy*tte
If you’ve been ‘thrilled’ then I suggest you seek some professional help.
NoMaliceForMallick. Is this your 1st or 2nd year in film studies?
Would you believe I write on one of your favorite shows…
Joaquin Phoenix is FINALLY back! I’m there!!!
Who are these people who keep making a fuss over Scientology? Maybe its the Scientology people trying to get the spotlight on themselves for publicity. I’ll see it for Phoenix. Brilliant actor. Don’t care WHAT the movie is about.
Tom? Katie?…. go home, shut up, and take your silly “religion” with you, you’re BORING!!!!
Hard nut to crack = bored audiences.
Rather have an amusement park director then pretentious art house crap. Although u am grateful for tree of life for curing my insomnia.
As for whedon, not sure any rides will be ressurrected around the upcoming much ado about nothing, but here’s hopin!
The Master is about L. Ron Hubbard in the same way Citizen Kane is about William Randolph Hearst.
I wish I could say I was thrilled by a movie recently but its been a very long time.
Show them how it’s done, PTA.
So, the really good scenes from the trailer are not in the film? Uh-oh, sounds like more Harvey Weinstein marketing bullshit. Let’s face it, PTA is very talented, but limited. Really good characters, really great performances, really bad story/plot. Did anyone like the latter part of There Will Be Blood, or Magnolia? Maybe there will be a rain of gerbils this time.
Trailers are edited at the same time the feature is being cut. Things are cut out of features all the time after trailers are locked. There’s no earthly reason to intentionally/nefariously put a scene in a trailer – that is not intended to be in the movie. It’s a natural consequence of the process.
It’s the “amusement park ride” films that make the money because people want to enjoy themselves and go to a GOOD film over and over – like TITANIC or AVATAR. This film sounds like a dud from the get-go; the people who “Rave about it” are critics. Critics are generally failures at the thing they are criticizing. They can’t produce anything on their own but how easy it is to address someone else’s work… Yawn
hmm… Titanic and Avatar. Really? I’d like to know on what planet those are considered good films (by anyone over the age of 12)… Oh, yes, I think I know the answer: Pandora.
Yeah, I dislike that these comments have begun to skew towards a much, much younger crowd. There was a time when these were only insiders.
It’s those “Amusement Park Directors” that make the money so that studios CAN afford to make critically acclaimed film like “The Master”. Why can’t you enjoy both? I enjoy both!
I love both kinds of movies. I just haven’t seen a ‘good’ Hollywood movie in a LOOOOOOOOOONG time.
I wouldn’t say War Horse paid for anything but Steven’s new pool. Super 8 paid for a few new cars for JJ but the studio won’t be bankrolling anything of its back ever.
People who think that incoherence is synonymous with greatness,now that is on target.The Marx brothers probably could have made a very funny film with this scenario,Anderson, Anderson’s auteur status and his net results,oh and Anderson’s followers.Ah, the stuff of parody,unintentional of course.
I just wish some of these directors had gas left in the tank… I’m ready for the next gen.
I find the casting of Joaquin Phoenix really interesting. The Phoenix family always reminded me of Clyde Griffiths’ family (Montgomery Clift/George Eastman in “A Place in the Sun”)in Dreiser’s “An American Tragedy.” The character is from a Holy Roller family in the book (most prominent in the novel)who yearns for the country club life; the religion gets left far behind, a different kind of mooring. In theory this desire makes him a murderer. Hubbard created an experiential trap in order to lure the unhinged (or unmoored if you will) purging previously held religious beliefs in order to foster a dependence on what he conceived as a global Ponzi scheme converting the pursuit of the country club life…into a religion; and a permanent surreal perception of life. In every way you pay “dues” until you are no longer recognizable. Literary Naturalism and Realism…got flipped. You have to ask yourselves why there are no great Scientologist authors. Linear thinking goes out the window. It’s like a “religion” for dyslexics. You miss any Paul Thomas Anderson at your peril.
I saw a 70mm screening in SF two weeks ago. Half or more of the scenes in the teaser trailers were not in the film:
- no “incident” questioning scene
- no “say something that’s true”
- no scene where Freddie runs to catch up to a moving truck
Movie was still brilliant, but I’m surprised there are so many great-looking scenes in the trailer that got cut. Maybe they’ll make it onto the Blu-ray?