Sure looks that way based on the company’s press invitation to an October 23 meeting at San Jose’s California Theater. Per usual, Apple‘s keeping everything secret. But the note says that “We’ve got a little more to show you.” There’ve been countless reports that the company is preparing a version of the iPad that would be cheaper and smaller so it could compete more directly with products such as Amazon’s Kindle Fire, Barnes & Noble’s Nook tablets, and Google’s Nexus 7. The conventional wisdom is that an iPad Mini would have a screen that’s about 7 or 8 inches vs the iPad’s 9.7 inches, and sell for less than $300. The latest full-sized iPad goes for at least $499 while the iPad 2 sells for $399. Last month, Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu said that in a visit to supply chain vendors in Asia “one of the key things” he heard was that “a smaller form factor iPad is in advanced stages where it is near ready for volume production.”


I thought an iPad mini was just an iPhone
A site like macrumors.com is the definitive place to go with that kind of question. Current rumor roundup:
1. A new iPad mini.
2. A refresh on the iPad to use the new Lightning connector that was put on the iPhone 5 and iPads.
3. A new 13″ retina display Macbook Pro (a smaller version of the 15″ laptop introduced earlier this year).
4. A new Mac Mini (small desktop computer/server with no built-in display)
5. A new thinner iMac (desktop computer with built-in display)
There is also discussion of an emphasis on iBooks. Apple is gunning to be the de-facto standard for e-textbooks in colleges.
It’s a sure thing. BTW, it’s going to be called an iPad nano. This monday I received an email from a friend of mine that reviews tech for a big publication. She forgot to remove the signature “Sent from my iPad nano”. She wouldn’t let me see it though
Bad economy? What bad economy? Looks like a lot of people have some disposable income to me…
Steve Jobs will be rolling his grave. Since when did Apple become a market follower instead of a market leader?
Apple didn’t make the first home computer, it didnt make the first mp3 player, the first tablet or even the first smart phone. It may have “perfected” all of them, but being a market leader means making the most desirable product, not be the first to market with a new idea…just ask the Apple Newton, thats not always a good idea
iPhone 3GS. That’s pretty much the product that made it clear Apple was no longer an innovator, and instead was relegating itself to a position of “pretty much what everyone else is doing.”