The Oscar-winning screenwriter of Thelma And Louise and director of The Divine Secrets Of The Ya-Ya Sisterhood has one of the rare critical hits of this fall TV season, Nashville. Callie Khouri talked to Salon recently about how she went from not wanting to write for TV to realizing that telling stories about women is more respected on the small screen:
I’m just liking TV so much more than features right now, just in terms of what you can get made… I don’t think any studio — it was a long shot at the time – but I don’t think any studio in a million years would make Thelma And Louise right now. But there’s so many other kinds of movies they won’t make right now.
People who make TV also seem much more comfortable making shows for women than people making movies do. Because you’re allowed. You’re allowed to make things for women on television and … you don’t have to go through the humiliation of having made something directed at women. There it’s just accepted, whereas if it’s a feature, it’s like “So, talk to me about chick flicks.”
… I just think it’s insulting that if there is something with women in it, it’s relegated to this kind of trash heap. It doesn’t matter what it is, how good it is, if there is emotion in it, it’s immediately going to be talked down to. And I’m obviously irritated by that. Probably all women are. Certainly a lot of women filmmakers are.
Whereas network TV, and ABC in particular, is often aimed at women. That’s who their audience is. I mean, again, it’s like, works for me. I want to make something that’s respectful, and respected. And I think you can make something for women that is respected on television. Anyway, I don’t want to just complain about features, but it does seem unduly hard given the number of women that exist in the world.


Hollywood makes films for women all the time. Jesus. Stop the victim-mentality whining, please.
Um, the number of films that are really “about” women is DWARFED by the number of films that target men and teenage boys. The film industry spends billions upon billions of dollars on comic book and robot fantasies come to life.
More often than not when a “woman’s” film is made it’s some heinously bad rom-com that women are just supposed to lap up, crap that reinforces stereotypes. And that’s the responsibility of the studios, because they can’t imagine what a female-centric story looks like anymore outside of the marketing demographics.
Amirite I know what you mean but I get what Callie is saying too. Hollywood marginalizes everyone all the time. It’s the nature of their business.
Amirite,
No, you’re not “rite,” and your post is about as intelligent as your screen name. Callie’s complaining about the pigeonholing of all movies made for women as “chick flicks,” and how if she wants to make a movie with depth and emotion that features women leads, she gets talked down to by executives, no matter how good the script is. What we need are more filmmakers like Callie, and less executives blocking her attempts to make great work with female leads.
They make films about women searching for love or having babies. I know that’s all I ever think about, because vagina. *eyeroll*
Ms. Khouri is a class act and a terrific writer!
I feel so sad reading this. And yes, I’m a woman. I’m sure many men will come on the site and snipe that Callie’s whining. I don’t think she is – she’s offering her opinion from her experience. Experience, no doubt, dealing with all the MBA’s that pass for leaders in our industry today – those who have replaced great creative show business minds. Replaced people willing to take a chance, make an original decision. To go out on a limb because they’re passionate about film, passionate about the story. Unfortunately, these days it’s all about the business and less about the show. Unless the show’s been done before and the dweeb opposite doesn’t have to take a risk.
Sad that she feels Thelma and Louise wouldn’t get made today. I wonder how many films on the AFI’s Top 100 would get made.
What a lousy state our industry is in, when the once great studio’s are now owned and run by corporations.
Callie’s statement is the dumbest excuse so far for not being able to sell a good story for a feature film. A great story is a great story no matter if it’s released on the big, or small screen. Shame on her for not being bold… anymore. Better yet… sad. If she were a man, I’d say, “where have your balls gone?”
If this were a man or a woman, if this were anything other than an anonymous few words that appeared on a message board, I’d ask, “Where has your civility gone? Where have you manners gone? You are disparaging a person, an extraordinary and deeply kind person at that, having NO idea who or what you are talking about.”
HS uses the word sad in order to diminish Callie Khouri. To say the post above is sad is to diminish the truth and the resonance of he word- sad. That post is just nothing.
Callie K. is a class act, and remains a thoughtful, relevant writer in this shifting tide of media.
Sure, TV is more likely to be made for women while movies are made for men – well, really, for boys – but not for any noble reason. TV is driven by ads and subscriptions, and middle aged women are a prime target for ads, and they also subscribe to TV. Movies are made to sell junk food at concession stands, and teenage boys are your prime target there. Different business models=different audiences=different product.
Temis-exactly correct. I love Callie, and she’s both right and wrong, right in her description, but I think wrong that it’s sexism…like everything with our industry, it’s commerce. And the executives ted to take on the mind-set of the audience they’re trying to please, so yes, I’m sure it can’t be fun trying to pitch a smart, female lead feature and getting questions like, is she fuckable? Is it funny, will she shit in a sink? Etc.
A great story may be a great story but not all great stories are commerce. If the assumption that the cream rises to the top was true, every movie would be excellent. Every movie is not excellent. #parentalguidance #battleship