Ron Burkle remains a mystery to Hollywood. The supermarket tycoon turned private equity funds manager has sat down with The New Yorker‘s Connie Bruck for a not-very-flattering long profile. It makes clear he has no over-arching strategy for his entertainment investments at present – except to avoid bidding wars. (“Burkle seemed to feel that as long as he was approaching movies as a hobby he could enjoy the dividend of glamour without violating his proscription against the business.”) But there is intel about his financial dealings with Harvey Weinstein and Ryan Kavanaugh. (“Burkle said that he particularly likes investing in people who have encountered adversity, because he believes they often come back stronger.”) For instance, the article says Burkle received all of Relativity as collateral for his most recent investment of a “couple of hundred of millions of dollars” – and that Burkle, not Kavanaugh, is now calling the shots at Relativity. It also speculates in the future Kavanaugh goes out and Weinstein comes in:
In the past seven years, Kavanaugh has proved adept at structuring deals where investors have done poorly while he and Relativity prospered. And last winter, when Kavanaugh’s luck finally seemed to have run out, Burkle rescued his company … Relativity’s first big-budget epic, “Immortals,” was set to open in early November, and, less than two weeks beforehand, Elliott reportedly threatened to reduce its investment unless Kavanaugh agreed to dramatic concessions. At this moment, Burkle appeared, and in a familiar guise: a fierce opportunist, cloaked in benevolence. Colbeck Capital, a New York firm that he helped establish, negotiated the deal with Kavanaugh, Burkle said: a fifty-million-dollar loan, followed by others. “Ryan was fair with us on one deal, and we liked the math and the structure and the security,” Burkle said. “He had ‘Mirror Mirror’ and ‘Act of Valor’ coming out, and somebody had to step in to do what his partner had promised to do and didn’t do.” He emphasized that Kavanaugh had not charmed him into this investment, even though he found him “personable.” In January, Burkle expanded his interest, in a transaction that gave him free equity. According to someone familiar with the transaction, the collateral was, essentially, the whole company.
This June, Relativity announced that it had raised three hundred and fifty million dollars in debt financing, structured by Colbeck. A new board of directors had been created, which included Burkle, two Colbeck bankers, and Kavanaugh; Elliott has departed, and Burkle is already exerting the kind of control over Kavanaugh that Singer never could. A new round of equity financing, which will seek investors from around the world, is planned in the next several months. For Burkle, the deal appears advantageous and cheap; had he set out to create such a broad-based entertainment company from scratch, it would have taken years. But the enterprise will succeed only if its movies do. One popular Hollywood theory is that Burkle will eventually fire Kavanaugh and most of the Relativity employees, put Harvey Weinstein in charge, and call the merged entities the Weinstein Company. Burkle rejects this scenario. When I asked Weinstein about it, he stammered for a moment and then said, “Ron has never said that to me, and I doubt that it would be true.”
Burkle also describes accompanying Harvey to the Cannes and Sundance film festivals and investing 50-50 in movies together:
“Harvey had always treated me like a star, even though he never had any reason to believe that I would ever be able to do anything with him.” … Burkle said that he and Weinstein have an informal agreement, in which “basically I can do half of what he does on a movie.” Burkle said, “We do everything on a handshake. The first movie we did together, ‘Idiot Brother,’ Harvey thought he spent more on P. & A.” — prints and advertising — “than he should have, and he called me and said, ‘I’m not gonna take a distribution fee because I don’t think I did you right.’ So, for whatever anybody’s ever told me about how tough Harvey is, he’s been ridiculously fair with me.” He added, “Everything I’ve done with Harvey has been profitable — everything.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.




So, when will IDIOT BROTHER 2 be coming out?
Dissemination passions profitable business. Learn to die beautifully.
In the whole industry…..Harvey Weinstein is the ONLY ONE with class, professional, honorable, and produce ” real art ” that is considered to be movies…….
One person can’t carry the weight for the entire industry where everyone is a moron, with low standards…..
Then there’s the issue of f-cking to the top in which if someone who is Oscar caliber talent, with looks that were discovered ” 3 times ” since the age of 12 ( discovered in a store ), 16 ( most beautiful face beating out thousands of faces ), 25 ( being pursued by make up company ), not to mention a body of a Mazerratti, and Shakespeare, Arthur Miller, Tennesse Williams performances anyone….?
Van Goh never f-cked his way up, he didn’t have to, because he had talent and the master of his work…..animals with no looks, class, absolutely no talent must rely on f-cking for art work……..
The gorgeous talent would NEVER do such thing, and she adores Harvey because they’re both ” top people “. Harvey is quite lonely and envied by everyone because in the whole industry, he is the ONLY special one, who is ” professional ” and knows what he’s doing…..he is a man of his word….it’s a NY thing!
What about Scott Rudin? Not taking anything away from Harvey, I agree with what you say about him. But I’d say Rudin definitely produces quality films. When it comes to being professional and honorable, I’d say they both have detractors on that, especially former assistants – and in the case of Harvey Scissorhands, some filmmakers too.
Van Gogh never sold a painting while he was alive and was considered to be a failure as an artist by his contemporaries, what exactly is the correlation you’re trying to make here?
Not sure I understand your pov. You are trying to say just because Harvey tends to produce or invest in high brow oriented films that somehow makes him better than others in the film industry. That is just an absurd statement.
I must say there are many well made high concept movies that appeal to audiences worldwide. This business is a business not a art house oriented business in general. Unfortunately it is very expensive to market a film to the masses and therefore there needs to be a concept that has the potential to appeal to a wide demographic. Many people do not like some of Harvey’s movies. They are not their cup of tea. This is nothing to do with his taste or execution on a movie it is some people like more mainstream oriented movies.
Burkle plus “Dividend of glamour” = a constant supply of hot young women. It’s like investing in nightclubs or bars when you’re a billionaire, you’re not doing it for the money….
I have my own ideas about hollywood. I believe it is a jungle and you must have allegator skin to survive. also be multi talented as well. give yourself up to it for 10 years to get your big break, especially if you don’t have nepatism behind you. weinstein is one of the better people out there. Thank god we have a few of them. At lease honest, and hard worg and not trying to screw everybody else!
Maybe Ryan should have stuck to investing in movies instead of actually choosing which to make.
Sounds like someone was finally able to put a leash on Ryan… Burkle is too big for HW to push around. So the smartest thing that HW can do is to be honest with the guy to get his endorsement. Screw the guys you can afford to but not the people on top who can make you look good. HW is brilliant.
Isn’t it beautiful the constants that this one industry above all others has consistently embraced for over one hundred years — sex, money, power. And sometimes even “quality” comes into the picture(s).