Season-to-date prime time ratings are down 11% vs last year for the Big Four networks in live-plus-same-day results for their target audience of 18-to-49 year olds. And investors want to know: Is this a blip, or a symptom of a deeper problem — possibly viewer defection to online videos? Two reports out this morning acknowledge the problem but urge investors to wait for more information before panicking about the prospects for the Big Media companies that own the major networks. While it may be cold comfort for moguls, the main problem seems to be something they can address: lousy programs. “Most of the freshman shows have been a disappointment,” says Barclays Equity Research’s Anthony DiClemente. “Without top quality new programs to augment the success of past hits, we believe aggregate network ratings have suffered.”
Still, several factors may have exaggerated the problem. There are the vagaries of the schedule: For example CBS’s decision to move Two And A Half Men from Monday to Thursday “impacts both nights because of last year’s early success on Monday [with the introduction of Ashton Kutcher who replaced Charlie Sheen] combined with the greater competition this year on Thursday,” Nomura Equity Research’s Michael Nathanson says. NFL football also may be tipping the scales: Match ups are stronger this year for Monday Night Football, and the NFL Network added five Thursday Night Football games. (Previously it didn’t begin its schedule until week 10.) That could be taking a bigger bite than usual from live ratings as the number of people who use DVRs to time-shift non-sports programming grows. The audience for shows including Revolution, Glee, The Office and Up All Night is at least 50% higher when you measure viewing up to seven days after they air vs live plus same day results. When Nielsen releases the data that advertisers value most, live-plus-three day ratings, that “will tell a more complete story,” DiClemente says.
But while the additional info will help, ”we don’t see it offsetting this year’s higher declines,” Nathanson says. He warns that CBS, which collects 27% of its revenues from broadcast network advertising, is “most exposed” if the ratings drop continues. It would affect 8% of News Corp’s revenues, 7% of Disney’s, and 5% of Comcast’s (which controls NBCUniversal). Put another way, if broadcast network ad sales dropped by 5% due to poor ratings it could cut earnings per share at CBS by 5.7%, News Corp by 2.1%, Disney by 1.3%, and Comcast by 0.7%.


I think broadcast is starting to belly out becuase people are not stuck with just network television. That and Nielson clearly needs to re-evaluate there system for ratings.
It’s called really bad network tv shows. The dramas the last few years, especially this year, are dreadful. (Nashville was well done.)
Good news is cable dramas are amazing and seem to get better and better. Cable drama is simply so much better I’ve given up on Network TV outside of Modern Family essentially.
This is as direct a barometer of the job skills of the development executives and non-writing executive producers as you can get. They are the people picking the shows for the most part, and there should be some accountability when numbers like these go down. Particularly at Fox, where they will see a very long-held lead in the demo evaporate this year becauase of the brand erosion caused by their disastrous and creatively bankrupt recent scripted bets on things like Mob Doctor, Terra Nova and Touch. This started happening at NBC in 2006/7 and it’s happening at Fox right now.
FOX needs a new 24 bad. They really should take a second look at that pilot Exit Strategy, it sounded the most comparable.
I’m sure I’m not the only one who has changed my viewing habits thanks to DVR and online streaming. There’s no reason to schedule my life around new airings of TV shows, especially when there’s no guarantee that a show will be new. Networks play games with shows by waiting several weeks in between airing new episodes, randomly airing re-runs, pre-empting shows for random events, and staggering start dates of new seasons.
I like how on cable you get the same show at the same time, all new episodes, for two or three months, then the season ends. I’d rather not have to Google a TV schedule to figure out who is showing new episodes of what each week, so I just stick with checking Hulu when I want to watch new episodes and head to Netflix when I want to watch re-runs.
Most of my friends don’t even have cable. I still can’t do without it because I’m a sports fan, but I can see why friends who don’t care about sports are opting not to pay $60/month for content that they can get for free on the web.
Oddly, the last Episode of “Family Guy” clearly illustrated why Nielsen is a mess.
Overhaul the system to get more accurate numbers and see how the ratings for most shows will dramatically change.
Bottom line: networks can scream all they want that live +3 or live +7 show that people are watching their shows, an they are probably right. Problem is they only get paid for C3 which is anyone that watches the COMMERCIALS of a show in the first 3 days. If you watch a DVR show and fast forward through the commercials, the networks get NO revenue. Either the broadcast nets are going to be able to seriously amp up their subscriber fees to levels that matter and can offset the costs of programming and sports, or their revenues are going to continue to plummet. If they can successfully transition to the cable model an gets a few bucks per subscriber they’ll be fine.
Great analysis here. Agree with the above poster, cable is becoming more mainstream — just look at Sons of Anarchy (FX) regularly winning its 10pm 18-49 demo. Also, Sunday nights are extremely fragmented with HBO, Showtime and Sunday Night Football in the mix. Next season, will networks use better counter programming around Sunday and Thursday?
This season, there are not many new broadcast shows to really get excited about.
So network TV is down 11% from last year? One of the local LA radio hosts offered a theory called the black tax. When Obama got elected the sponsors and network executives decided to get on the diversity bandwagon and they put out a production formula edict. All shows and commercials will have a ratio of two whites and one person of color. TV insiders refer to it as the Black Tax. However there has been an unforseen result. The real talent in the industry, the writers, have had a tough time trying to find a way to plausible drop a black into the middle of an established story line. Often it’s done in a ham handed manner that is obvious and to the point that the character believability doesn’t make sense and the shows entertainment value evaporates. It has been suggested that the networks simply misread the acceptability of the formula by the national TV audience. Obviously the New York based networks did not foresee the effect that the rapid implementation of the formula would have on scripts and a programs entertainment quotient
I wish I lived near your local radio host…that way I would know what to think too.
This is pure and utter bs. Whoever said this I wish he could hear himself so we don’t have to.
This has got to be the most stupidest analogy I’ve seen on any website. Never mind TV, the real question we really should be asking is – why is radio a dying medium? With hosts like that, now we know.
Here’s how you plausibly drop a black character in the middle of a storyline: the same way you’d drop a white character in the middle of a storyline.
Any writer who has trouble with that needs to find a different line of work.
The trouble w/network TV is that ever-multiplying armies of D-girls and D-boys who find employment with ever-increasing layers of networks, studios, and boutique producing entities are micro-managing writers and producers in ever-increasing ways through notes and strictures that grow exponentially more specific even as they grow exponentially more moronic. It’s a miracle anyone still watches at all. Cable, Banjamin. Cable.
The answer is simple, really: TV sucks. People have too many other options to put up with the crap that passes for entertainment out of Hollywood. Bring back good writing, actors hired for talent and not looks, and stories that are relevant outside of Hollywood, and people will watch.
Another problem may be people going out more.
I have heard that Friday-night ratings are down because attendance at high-school football games in many areas around the country this Fall (many of which are played on Friday nights) is substantially up. This means fewer people are home and able t9o see prime-time TV.
I’m beginning to think we’ll see more live programming in the future; that could be a way to thwart DVR’s/Tivo’s/VCR’s and maybe even keep people home (it’s no secret that Friday and Saturday viewing is down in recent years bacsue more people are going out on those nights).
Nothing new. A stronger drop then usual. Investors should hang on. There are recent seasons with similar tracking year to year that were up the next that can be pointed to. They won’t be around forever but research needs to go further because videos are not the answer. Somehow the networks need to make more noise in the summer before their launches. They’re being drown out. Do that, see an uptick. Ads are being skipped, billboards ignored, I think it’s something greater – an unwillingness to sample new product and bigger than that not being aware of when that new product in the first place. Air a pilot in the Spring – tease the hell out of it all summer. I seem to recall one network doing that recently. Make more noise .