UPDATE: Not so fast. The deal didn’t get done and now Time Warner Cable is hot and heavy into the negotiating mix. Fox is pissed, to say the least.
EXCLUSIVE: It seems strangely logical that the highest-priced sports team in the world is about to score the richest TV deal ever in 
pro sports history. Insiders tell me that Fox Sports is close to clinching the exclusive TV rights for the Los Angeles Dodgers by paying between $6 billion and $7 billion over 25 years to put the team on its regional sports network in Southern California and of course its national Fox Broadcasting Company. Fox already shows the games on its Prime Ticket local cable channel but also has Fox Sports West here.
The previous agreement expires at the end of next season, and saw Fox Sports paying only about $40 million per season for the Dodgers TV rights. There was speculation the final price would just go north of $150 million per season. This new deal soars to $280 million per season (the average for the life of the contract). The huge outlay by News Corp demonstrates the increasing value of sports to its bottom line, while the huge payday for Guggenheim offsets the record-setting $2.15 billion price paid for the Dodgers.
Related: Dodgers, Fox Sports Settle TV Rights Feud
But the sheer greed of Guggenheim’s ask on this new deal is staggering, especially when you consider it will all get passed down to the cable systems, advertisers, and ultimately consumers. The alternative for Guggenheim included higher ticket prices which would serve to only further alienate fans. Plus the new owners claim to need the money to bribe talented players to come to the mediocre Dodgers. And then there’s the sad fact that Major League Baseball teams are shifting from broadcast TV to cable networks – so fewer games will be available on free TV. Fox Sports expects to broadcast only one or two Major League Baseball games a week for the national audience next season.
Guggenheim and Fox Sports began preliminary talks in May. Then Fox Sports Media Group Co-President/COO Randy Freer enjoyed a 45-day exclusive negotiating window with Guggenheim Baseball Management’s Todd Boehly, the president of private equity firm Guggenheim Partners who was negotiating solo for the Dodgers owners. (Those owners also include former Los Angeles Lakers star turned mega-investor Magic Johnson, former Atlanta Braves and Washington Nationals president Stan Kasten and Mandalay Entertainment CEO Peter Guber.) Those talks began October 15th and are set to expire on November 30th. My insiders think, barring any unforeseen obstacles, the Fox-Dodgers deal could clinch by Tuesday. If it doesn’t get done by the 30th deadline, Boehly will have blown the negotiations bigtime.
Related: Magic Johnson’s Group Wins Bidding To Buy Dodgers
I’m told a deal came “very close” to being done about a week ago “and then it went a little bit south”. To rattle Guggenheim’s cages, Fox Sports delivered an ultimatum that a deal had to be done by the end of this month or else it would stop negotiating. (Terms like “It’s dead” and “We’re out” were used.) The Fox Sports gambit worked. Because it would have left Guggenheim in a terrible situation without multiple bidders and with little leverage for next-in-line Time Warner Cable since CBS, Comcast/NBC, ABC/ESPN and even the MSG Network (controlled by the owners of Cablevision) never materialized. Of course, Guggenheim could have opted for the Dodgers to start its own network, as the Mets and Yankees have done. But big rewards come with big risks.
Also, in the middle of the run-up to negotiations in early October, Guggenheim’s Boehly bought Dick Clark Productions and put on the table a “programming element” involving Fox Broadcasting Network and DCP. Specifically, it called for DCP to have “more inventory” i.e. more shows airing on Fox Networks, sources tell me. I’m told the provision has been “in and out and in” the deal over recent weeks but appears to be ‘in’ right now.
Freer really knows this business – he ran the Fox regional sports networks for nearly half a decade - and knows not to overpay. He’s not when you consider that the Dodgers will play 162 games when the season starts in April. And yet TV rights to the Lakers who play 82 games just sold to Time Warner Cable for $3B over 20 years. And Fox just paid $3B for 49% of the YES Network which owns TV rights to the New York Yankees for 20 years. Considering that Fox also has the right to own 80% of YES (and will surely exercise that option), then $6B-$7B for this Dodgers deal sounds about about right given the hyper-inflated finances of sports TV rights. In the era of DVR, Hulu, Netflix and other ways to watch TV, sports viewers (overwhelmingly male) watch live and therefore don’t always skip through ads.
This makes sports programming increasingly valuable. It also helps Rupert Murdoch move yet another step closer to that national sports channel which is his long-term play to rival ESPN – and as a result extract higher fees from cable and satellite companies. The deal also satisfies investor curiosity about what News Corp has planned for its $10B cash stockpiled last year to buy the remaining stake in British Sky Broadcasting - until that deal was scuttled because of Rupe’s tabloid phone hacking scandal.
I understand that News Corp Deputy Chief Operating Officer James Murdoch, who was key to the company’s YES Network bid, “helped a little” with the Dodgers deal. The scion is a big believer in the power of sports programming and in his newly expanded job James oversees News Corp’s television business, including its regional sports channels. Plus, News Corp is preparing to split off its troubled publishing assets into a separate publicly traded company from its entertainment giant which will continue to grow through acquisitions particularly in its regional sports and cable television businesses.
Fox Sports making this latest deal was both offensive and defensive. It’s not just ESPN whose the main rival. The last thing Fox Sports wants is to see Time Warner Cable snap up bigger pieces of local sports networks or national sports teams after it snagged the Lakers TV rights deal away from Fox for its new channel SportsNet. Indeed Time Warner Cable has stated publicly that “we absolutely plan to become competitive” in TV rights now that it’s launched both an English- and Spanish-language sports telecast.
Of course, it has to rile News Corp that it once owned the Dodgers from 1998 to 2004 after paying a mere $350 million for the team from the O’Malley family. Eventually, mismanagement took a $50 million a year toll on the team and owner, which then sold the Dodgers for $430 million to Frank McCourt, who earlier this year sold it to Guggenheim. At one time McCourt offered News Corp the team’s TV rights for a bargain basement price. Now, as one newspaper pundit put it, ”someone in News Corp’s accounting department with a long memory will probably be rolling his eyes”.
Whatever happens, TV rights prices won’t come down anytime soon unless ‘a la carte’ cable gets some semblance of traction in the courts or Congress and not just with consumers. And if that does ever happen, “the strong will survive, the weak will go,” one Big Media bigwig told me today very matter-of-factly.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Hollyfuckdatalottamoney.
Your story is good and a compelling one considering Murdoch’s large buy of the YES network. I would love to see another national sports channel beyond ESPN given the fact that they’ve turned it into the TMZ sports channel and choose personal opinion above objective journalism. Kinda like what you did. See what I did there?
Grow up.
Fox simply had to kep the Dodgers and paid through the nose to do so. It’s got to be a blow to Time Warner Sports because after the Lakers are done playing the viewers will go away for 5 months. $280 million is an astronomical figure for the rights but if you pay $2 billion for a team you need to recoup the money somewhere.
That breaks down to over $1.7 million dollars per game.
Is News Corp. run by suckers?
Answer: yes, if they pay that price.
I must agree with Casey. We both know that the Dodgers’s fan will paid the price and the cost in the long run. You will need to work extra hours to afford the prices of watching sports on cable. Sport won’t be on free TV. Ex. channel 9/11.
Who is paying for this?
We are the cable customers will see a nice increase in bills,
Oh, that’s right, the fans. Will anyone protest this nonsense? Why should people pay more in their cable bills for the Dodgers if they don’t even watch them?
So the horribly average Dodgers TV rights are worth more to Fox than Star Wars?
I don’t understand the economics of this deal. Are the Dodgers as valuable a name as the Yankees, Sox, hm..Phillies? I’m not trying to be snarky, I just don’t get the particular value of the Dodgers as they haven’t been one of the more successful teams in MLB.
Since moving to Los Angeles, Dodgers have won more games, more pennants, and more World Championships than any team other than the Yankees. They have more hall of famers than the Yankees. Are you that ignorant? The Dodgers have the all-time record for fan attendance. They are a marquee flagship brand. Just because they were sold to bad groups 20 years ago doesn’t negate their position in baseball lore. Taking a few years of recent Phillies success and actually thinking they are superior to the Dodgers? The Dodgers have triple the Phillies championships for starters. What a joke. Sorry, but your comment was so baseless and ignorant. The Dodgers are a jewel.
Sorry, but the Phillies aren’t a MLB prime jewel and they don’t come close in tradition and history as the Dodger’s, Yankee’s, Red Sox, or the Cubs.
Alexgk,
You are nominated for 2012′s dumbest baseball post of the year. Congratulations.
Suddenly, $2.1 Billion to buy the team doesn’t look like as awful a deal.
Sports are one of the last programs that people watch live (and hence, don’t skip the commercials) so it makes a lot of sense to invest in local sports, which have a built in consumer base. $6-7 Billion does sound like an awful lot, though
Geez, snd. I thought basebsll was on its last legs…
Best sports media take I’ve read in a long time. Thank you Nikki.
YES + Dodgers, very smart moves by FOX. Guggenheim partners score a homerun and make billions. The subscribers of course will get stuck with the bill of higher sports packages. The irony is FOX, re-purchasing the t.v rights of the Dodgers for billions more than what they had paid for the entire franchise. Just look at the history of the television sports business. CBS had the NFL, balked at the terms of a new contract. FOX moved in took the heat for paying the NFL price at that time. NFL is the king of all ratings and advertising revenue. Team owners in every league are loving these new deals. Perhaps the NHL will take this all in and see the light.
People watched sports because it was affordable. Now, more and more people are staying away. When I see parking for $45 at NFL games, I don’t bother anymore. It’s not worth that much to me. I can watch it on TV. If my cable gets expensive, there are other things that I can do. They can keep testing the public. I see what’s going on, and I want nothing to do with it.
I hope that price tag includes Vin Scully and Ken Levine…..
-RnsW
The Dodgers are one of the lowest rated teams in MLB, averaging about a 1 rating, Yankees rate 4 to 5 times higher, Red Sox even more.
The real sadness here is 100% of pay tv subscribers will pay an incremental $5 or so per month, just for the Dodgers, when only around 20% of pay tv subscribers actually watch the Dodgers on the Fox cable channel….
Anyone else hear the phones ringing in LA Congressional offices?
Folks in LA are in the eye of the sports tv storm. All these new channels that only cost you more in the end. TW/Lakers, Dodgers, Pac-12. All jammed down your throats. Rise up I say! Fight back!
Guys like to watch sports live until their team is eliminated from the playoffs. Or they realize they have bigger things to worry about besides Manny Being Manny.
It’s upsetting knowing my cable bill is covering for all this greed from pro and college teams. They plead poverty as they steal bread off my plate.
Rip off. Fox is stupid, mediocre Dodgers will need every penny plowed back into them and more even with current talent roster, lame stadium, etc.
Go Cards! Dodgers suck…
Why didn’t they just buy the team?
Most astute comment on this entire post and thread.
Somebody’s gotta pay for Beckett’s chicken!
The good in all of this is that Rupert Murdoch got fleeced by Major League Baseball an extra 5B dollars. We all forget the pawn on his chess board that was Frank McCourt who was going to sell the TV rights to Rupe at a fraction of this price. All a part of the original stake Rupe made in navigating McCourt’s leveraged swindle to get the team from the O’Malley’s so he could be Rupe’s lackey… Err… steward, until this last contract expired. But the wiley old Selig, and his money hungry partners who have a dying business, never liked the Aussie ownership, and certainly saw McCourt and his trashy wife for the carpet baggers they were. There was no way they were going to allow the 2nd most lucrative market’s TV rights to just get taken off the table. The problem for Selig and his vsionaries was ESPN didn’t need to cannibalize itself at any price, so there were no other buyers out there who could write the check they wanted. What to do, what to do. Why not let Rupe be the one to cannibalize himself; so they take over the team, sell it for a ridiculous price to an ownership group who not only wanted to own a big franchise for its other sports interests, while understanding the value of those TV rights which is what compelled them to make the August trade they did… A trade the Commissioner could easily have stopped in the best interests of Baseball but who certainly saw the concept of ‘best’ quite differently. Rupe was checkmated because he needed the rights in order to take on the Mouse House, even if it would cost him much more than he thought it would. He might be aggrieved by the inconvenience, the owners might be much wealthier because of revenue sharing, and the Guggenheim Group’s strategic play with Bud Selig as their wingman, has come up aces. Everybody gets rich… Except the fan who once again watches mediocre product and pays too much for the privelege. It’s all that’s right and wrong with capitalism in the 21st Century.
There is a lot of conspiracy theories in this post – but none-the-less this was an awesome post.
The protest is easy. Cut back on cable. Baseball is the best game for radio any way.
What intrigues me is the length of the deal. Subtract twenty-five years from today and one gets 1987. Pre-internet, pre-DVD, pre-sophisticated game console 1987. I presume that the compensation escalates in the later years, but sports broadcast licenses have increased in value over the past five years because of the increase in DVRs, non-sport programming internet distribution, and cheap but manipulated non-scripted programming. Have these disruptions actually matured into a something predictable. Shoot, newspapers had an awesome business model in 1987. And Fox may or may not have to buy more programs from DCP. Wouldn’t those be awards shows and haven’t we been seeing a glut of those already? Will ball club and operational costs escalate at the same rate as the compensation? Did Chick Hearn’s death reduce Laker viewership and what will happen when, and may this day be long in coming, Dodgers games are not called by Vin Scully?
But, hey, they have more MBAs than I do. It must be a really smart deal to make.
All this money coming in and going out and the Dodgers still underperformed. They made the biggest trades of the season and got blown out of their division by the mostly home-grown Giants.
You’re an idiot. The Dodgers were 2nd in MLB in injuries, and didn’t make these major overhaul moves until late in the season.
All these comments are ignorant. I am out.
The Dodgers were still in playoff contention until late September. They actually controlled their division until after the all star break.
I hope that when the dodgers finally get ball this money from this fox deal they decide to renovate an aging dodger stadium and at least make it more modern and fan friendly
Every time I ready another article like this, I gloat a little more about already having dumped cable. Good luck to everyone else paying for the mega-greed of sports franchises. I wonder how long it will take before everyone is fed up?
Stellar article on an important, compelling issue. Please keep them coming.
Overpaying can blow up in their face. Cable subscribers should track their bills on this. The Dodgers are a mediocre team in a lousy stadium. Vin Scully is the only reason I occasionally tune in – on MLBTV, by the way.
Actually, the Dodgers contended for almost all of the past season. They were in first place for a great part of it. So, they are not “mediocre.”
As for Dodger Stadium, it remains one of the most beautiful sports venues in America.
As for tuning in to hear Vin Scully, well, you got that right.
where are all the naysayers who said $2.1 billion was way too much to pay for this team? these guys are not stupid, nor is it their first rodeo.