
EXCLUSIVE: D.W. Harper has been set to write a new draft of The Forever War for Fox 2000 and Scott Free. It’s a directing vehicle for Ridley Scott, who for 25 years has wanted to helm an adaptation of Joe Haldeman’s 1974 seminal science fiction novel. The hope is to get the project moving with a script by Harper, who most recently wrote All You Need Is Kill, the sci-fi film that is in production with Tom Cruise starring and Doug Liman directing.
I first wrote about this one when the studio acquired the Haldeman book back in 2008, and at that time Scott told me it was “a science-fiction epic, a bit of ‘The Odyssey’ by way of ‘Blade Runner,’ built on a brilliant, disorienting premise.” Scott first pursued the book not long after it was published, but the rights were unavailable for a long time. Oscar-winning Raiders Of The Lost Ark VFX wiz Richard Edlund originally bought the rights with the intention of making his directing debut on the film, but it never got off the ground and finally Scott’s home studio was able to make a deal. His Scott Free is producing, with Vince Gerardis exec producing. Fox 2000’s Rodney Ferrell is steering the pic. Haldeman’s book won the 1975 Nebula Award and the 1976 Hugo Award.
I’ll try to explain that disorienting premise: A soldier reluctantly battles an enemy in deep space, and while he spends a short time in battle, the time dilation of space channel causes him to return home to a planet that has aged to the point it is almost unrecognizable to the soldier.
Harper, who co-wrote the upcoming Hansel And Gretel Witch Hunters and adapted Isaac Asimov’s Foundation for director Roland Emmerich, is repped by CAA and Management 360.
Haldeman’s novella Seasons was recently acquired by Sony Pictures as a directing vehicle for Tim Miller, with Sebastian Gutierrez writing the script. Scott, who last helmed Prometheus, most recently wrapped the Cormac McCarthy-scripted The Counselor with Michael Fassbender, Brad Pitt, Javier Bardem, Penelope Cruz and Cameron Diaz. Scott is separately trying to mount a sequel to his sci-fi classic Blade Runner. Prometheus, a sort of prequel to Alien, got somewhat mixed reviews, but I found it fascinating. It is nice to see Scott back and working in the genre he transformed with Alien and Blade Runner.


This is great news and an upgrade for Scott trading von Däniken’s pseudoscience for Joe Haldeman’s brilliance and scientific accuracy…could be Scott’s 2001.
Let us hope. And let us hope he hires a “good” writer. Prometheus was a HUGE flop. Not because of the visuals but because of the story. Oh yeah, what story? It was nothing but a high-tech big-budget LOST episode of wondering rambling random silliness. Not consistent and poorly written… memo to writers: take a few lessons from Joe Straczynski.
One of the classics of Science Fiction. I’d feel a lot better about this if it wasn’t Ridley Scott. Or if I hadn’t seen Prometheus.
LOL! Come on. You saw “Alien”, didn’t you? Scott’s made some clunkers, but he’s fearless & has made some brilliant cinema as well.
Anyone else think look at that book cover and think that it looked like James Franco??
Yes, it does look like James Franco hahahaha. It would be kind of cool, if James worked on this project. Looking forward to developments whatever happens, sounds interesting.
I came here to only comment on the book cover, also – it looks EXACTLY like James Franco
The Forever War is the sci-fi Scott should have made instead of that abomination called Prometheus.
Concur… Joe Haldman’s story is award winning. I wish Scott would have done that first. Prometheus is going to require a death march of movies to explain itself and make sense. Whereas “Forever War” is a single superb story that won’t require years and a dozen movies to come together. Scott is in his 70′s and I am concerned he’s going to waste time and resources on sequels.
WHOA!!!!
Brilliant combo of material & Director. Very exciting indeed!
Sounds great! But, would someone please make the great sifi novel ” Spin “, into a movie or a mini-series.
Even though this is a direct response to Vietnam veterans feeling out of place when they returned to stateside, there’s a lot of fun stuff to mine for a visually exciting, big-idea movie. I’m keeping my fingers crossed that stuff like this, Foundation and Enders Game get people excited for classic scifi.
Now let’s get moving on the Leviathan Wakes movie, people…
If it was 1982 Ridley I’d be thrilled but after seeing PROMETHEUS, not at all optimistic though I’d love to be proven wrong.
Concur. Concerning Prometheus, I lay more blame on writer Damon Lindelof. Prometheus was a glorified LOST episode… crap story. Biggest mistake Scott ever made was to go down the LOST rathole of vague, pointless, random, nonsensical story telling.
—-Still more –cutting edge —decades stale
‘on board’ predictive programming from the ——long ago
promising —Ridley Scott. . .
in the end of the 1980′s this novel was adapted in Europe into a highly succesfull comic (European style). would be interesting to know how closely that would be followed….
Very excited to hear this. Scott is one of the five best Directors working today. The visuals of Prometheus were breathtaking. The script needed work to remove the clunky bits, but I enjoyed it. Something to remember: Even if RS falls short, he continually reaches for the stars because he knows that’s how great, grand and visionary cinema is made.
Yes, the visuals were fabulous. Sadly, the story was pure rehashed hamster chow. Nothing but a high-tech big-budget LOST episode.
I’ll be watching this one with interest. As some others here have posted, I look forward to it with an odd mixture of hope and trepidation after watching two Ridley Scott clunkers back to back.
First, there was Prometheus, which I felt was the biggest movie disappointment of the year.
Then, just a few weeks ago, I had the displeasure of watching the re-make of Coma on DVD. I know that Scott did not direct this, but as a producer/director of considerable stature, he must have had some kind of script approval. Fine performances, but a flabby script bloated with unnecessary characters and story meanders. Essentially, it was the original movie buried in about an hour of extra crap to expand the running time from feature to miniseries.
And I say all this as a huge fan of Scott’s work, from the Duelists to Matchstick Men. I hope we’re not watching the decline of a great director.
And I don’t think the guy in that picture looks anything like James Franco. For one thing, James Franco doesn’t have a gaudy brooch where his left eye should be!
Who cares what the picture on the paperback looks like… it has no bearing to the story, movie, or ideas.