Don Groves is a Deadline contributor based in Sydney.
Peter Jackson again denied allegations of animal abuse during filming of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. “Absolutely none; no mistreatment, no abuse”, he said during a news conference in Wellington hours before Wednesday’s world premiere in New Zealand. The director also described animal rights group PETA as “pretty pathetic” for seeking publicity for their cause at the premiere. When asked if the negative publicity had dampened the experience of making the film, Jackson said it had not. “At the end of the day we’ve made a movie we’re extremely proud of. So many people have worked for so long, it will take a bit more than that to spoil the event”.
Related:
Peter Jackson Posts Defense Against Animal Cruelty Allegations
Meanwhile, Jackson urged audiences to see the movie in 48 frames per second where possible but acknowledged that only about 1,000 of the 25,000 cinemas worldwide that have booked the film have the technology to screen it at the super-fast speed. He described using the 48fps process as “dipping your toe in the water”. “The feeling that I have as a filmmaker is I have a responsibility to look at the technology that’s available to us now and to think of ways in which that technology can be used to enhance the cinemagoing experience”, he said.
Jackson also confessed his anxiety when he feared Martin Freeman may not have been available to play hobbit Bilbo Baggins. He said that when the trilogy finally got the greenlight (after MGM was recapitalized), he was worried that Freeman couldn’t take the role due to his commitments with the Sherlock TV series. “Ï was very down, I thought we were in serious trouble,” he said. The issue was resolved when Jackson decided to shut down the production to allow Freeman to fulfill his Sherlock duties.
Jackson got some laughs when he described how he cast Barry Humphries as the voice of the Goblin King. “It was interesting, trying to cast that role because the character is very uncouth, very bad personal hygiene issues, vocabulary is quite small, so obviously casting somebody from Australia seemed like the obvious place to go first,” he quipped. “If you look at all Australians available to us, Barry fits that bill perfectly.” Sitting nearby on stage, Humphries said he brings “a healthy Australian vulgarity” to the part, which was created using Weta Digital’s performance capture. ”I always thought motion capture was something you did when you were taking a specimen at the doctor”.


Of course he would deny it. What other choice does he have? But there is ample testimony that it was true.
There is??? Something tells me in this day and age, if there was animal cruelty taking place on a film set we would have seen it by now.
I want to hear a second opinion about any allegations of animal abuse on this picture. PETA lost me forever when they freaked out over President Obama killing a fly in an ABC interview a couple of years ago. They are extremists and have their own bat shit crazy agenda. Has the Royal New Zealand / Wellington SPCA weighed in on this?
I’d like to give Peter Jackson the benefit of the doubt, but if he’s calling Peta “pathetic”, it’s difficult to now believe what he says.
Right on!
PETA has proven itself to be a counter productive organization run by radicals. That’s pretty pathetic. Years ago it may have been a credible source to voice the concerns of animal abuse and lobby for animal rights, but these days PETA is little more than the organizing body of an extremist group. It’s a shame the crazy ones always seem to end up at the top.
Saying PETA is pathetic is such a gross understatement, but that’s another matter. I’m sure all of those animal trainers and handlers on set have dedicated their whole lives to animals because they hate animals. They’re probably all Dexters of the animal world. And everyone knows animals are more likely to cooperate in the film if you starve, beat, and generally make them as miserable as possible. It’s the same with actors.
He didn’t call them pathetic his said their actions at trying to gain publicity from his film was pathetic.
And it’s PETA, who cares what they say. When/if the RSPCA or the New Zealand equivalent (RNZSPCA) begin an investigation into the matters then it is news worthy, PETA claim to be all about the animals and but care more about making the papers than actually helping.
I shall not be seeing this film unless there is a full independent enquiry on what exactly happened. I urge everyone with a sense of moral decency to vote with your wallets and not see this film. That will force Warners to take action and commission a thorough investigation. The reports of animals lying in ditches with broken backs makes me want to cry.
PETA is pathetic. They love publicity, not the truth. Shame on them for riding the backs of others to gain the spotlight. Disgusting.
Peta is a group of extremists . I used to agree with their point on things- but not anymore. I’m sure there is a real version in all this. I don’t believe either one of them. And they should have someone watching more over the use of living things. If you can’t care for them- use digital
But PETA IS pathetic. They criticized Obama for pardoning turkeys because by pardoning them he is implying that they did something wrong. They are insane and should be ignored 100% of the time.
PETA is no more “insane” than the millions of drones who drool over dead pigs and cows that are ripped apart, burned, and fed to their masters’ drooling, fat faces for their bloated amusement. Pretty disgusting, if you think about it. But, of course, you don’t.
Peta is pathetic…and you’re pathetic if you think otherwise.
This comment is pathetic. More witnesses have come forward about improper care of animals on The Hobbit. Whether it was during actual filming or not, production is responsible for taking care of the animals they work with. Everyone’s hating on PETA for speaking out about it, why? They’re absolutely right in doing so.
PETA once sent a letter of accusation of mistreatment of animals on a production I was involved with and threatened to go public after not hearing back from the production. The only problem was it was an animated film!!
The man doth protest too much.
Then again, what do you expect? Peter Jackson admitting to killing animals is like Kathryn Bigelow admitting to breaking federal laws by getting inside White House information for a movie.
”it will take a bit more than that to spoil the event.”
Uh oh. You know the bullies at PETA are gonna take that as a dare. Better wear white to the premiere, Pete. Those “warriors” can really make the flour fly.
So glad so many understand that PETA is pathetic. This is nothing but a shakedown.
Knowing the ridiculous amount of behind-the-scenes footage Peter Jackson has for all his movies, I’m sure it’d be on video if it really happened.
Please get over the PETA said “this”, PJ calling them pathetic “that”.
Something has occured.
Alligations of animals suffering and/or dying.
THAT is the key issue.
Enough has been stirred up for someone to commission and investigation and so it should be.
If i was Peter Jackson, and felt strongly against this, i would put my money where my mouth is, and pay for an indepedant investigation (yes, it can be done fairly), and have my name and the movie’s name cleared.
Anything less would start to stink a little or a lot.
What would he get by doing this…”Credibility!!!”
I’m sure someone will find fault with this, but please think clearly and try to see the big picture of this comment.
- animals suffered
- animals died
- all for the sake of entertainment
- a funded investigation is the very LEAST they should do.
Cheers.
Surely what matters (rather than who is pathetic and who isn’t) is the simple fact that some of the animals “used” in the making of this film suffered and even died. That is a fact – undeniable.
Given that fact how do the film-makers justify putting animals in a position where that is a potential outcome?
If they were unable to guarantee the safety of those on set – animal or human (and clearly they were unable to otherwise no one would have died) then they were irresponsible to create situations in which these animals were endangered to a level beyond what the film makers could manage safely
Basically, the evidence shows us that something went wrong (if it didn’t go wrong that means they were supposed to die, which obviously isn’t the case). Given that something went wrong they were clearly creating risks they couldn’t (didn’t) manage to contain.
That is irresponsible and should be dealt with accordingly.
That’s a good point. Thanks for mentioning it. Everyone has a cell phone these days with a camera/ video recorder. I’m thinking at least one persons would be a big enough animal lover that would be willing to risk their job to get proof. Those guys love animals more than humans.
There is no doubt in my mind that PETA’s accusations are completely without truth. If there had been ANY animal abuse whatsoever, someone would have documentation of it, and it would have been released somewhere, somehow, with all the social media outlets available to the world. Animal abuse of any sort is sickening, but so is an extremist group’s lies using fabricated stories to get money and/or attention.
I’ve decided to boycott the film. It’s all I can do to on my part to oppose this abuse and commodification of animals by the entertainment industry. PETA has done great work here in India at least, where animal suffering alleviation is concerned, and their words have always proved credible. It’s disheartening to see filmmakers pathetically exploit animals for their personal gains, and then refer to those doing good, selfless work as ‘pathetic’.
Animal abuse and neglect is pathetic….so don’t hats the messenger hats the message. HOW with all the money made on movies are all animals not given personal care. EACH ANIMAL should have first rate treatment before during and after shooting as payment for doing a job that makes people money. They didn’t get a choice but the people that hired them and their care givers and trainers got paid. ANIMALS PAID WITH THEIR LIVES!!!