UPDATE, 8:29 PM: Director Peter Jackson and the other producers of The Hobbit say that allegations by PETA of mistreatment of animals during the production of the upcoming film are “unsubstantiated.” Earlier today, it was reported that over two dozens animals used in the movie died from the conditions in a New Zealand farm they were housed in. The farm was over 180 miles from the movie’s main set. The producers later said that they “completely reject” the accusations. Now The Hobbit team say PETA never “properly” checked out the story of the dismissed animal wranglers that were the source of the claims. Read the producers’ full statement below:
The Hobbit production has always instituted swift and immediate investigations in to any concerns of any kind over the treatment of animals under its care. A prompt and thorough investigation into the recent unsubstantiated allegations by the American organisation, PETA, in to the ‘hobbling’ of a horse during the making of The Hobbit was undertaken. No evidence of such a practice was found to have occurred at any time. Further, the production contacted the owner of the horse concerned who provided the following statement: “I am 100% happy with the return of Shanghai and his condition. In the term that he was leased he was picked up and returned to me two times. On both occasions there was not a mark on him and he was healthy and happy. He has shown no signs of ill-treatment. I would not hesitate in leasing him to the movie again.”
To date, the only horse wranglers whose treatment of animals fell below the production’s standard of care seem to be the two wranglers who have chosen to level this new accusation on the eve of the premiere of the first Hobbit film and who were dismissed by the production over a year ago. Reports of their actions are documented in several written statements dating back to October 2011.The production regrets that PETA has chosen to make such a serious accusation, which has distressed many of the dedicated Kiwis who worked with animals on the films – including trainers, wranglers, care-givers, farm workers and animal health care professionals - without properly vetting the source from which they received this information.
PREVIOUS, 4:10 PM: The American Humane Association, which monitors on-set animal use under its “No Animals Were Harmed” program, called the animal deaths “needless and unacceptable” in a release of its own this afternoon. The group reiterated that it only monitors animal use on set, and that the incidents in question happened at a working farm 186 miles from the main set and 26 miles from the soundstage. “We do not have either the jurisdiction or funding to extend that oversight to activities or conditions off set or before animals come under our protection”, said AHA president and CEO Robin Ganzert. “There are too many incidents off the set and this must stop. It is vital that we work with the industry to bring the kind of protection we have for animals during filming to all phases of production.” The AHA said it sent letters to industry leaders in January of this year seeking ways to work together to improve the welfare of animals off the set as well as on.
PREVIOUS, 11:17 AM: Producers of Warner Bros‘ trilogy The Hobbit said today that they “completely reject the accusations that 27 animals died due to mistreatment during the making of the films”. In a statement, director Peter Jackson and other producers of the upcoming JRR Tolkien films say claims by dismissed animal wranglers that sinkholes and other death traps led to more than two dozen animal deaths on a farm where they were stabled and housed are false. The accusations were brought to light in a Associated Press report today based on information that rights group People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals claims it provided to the news agency. Here’s the producers’ statement:
The producers of The Hobbit take the welfare of all animals very seriously and have always pursued the highest standard of care for animals in their charge. Any incidents that occurred that were brought to their attention as regards to this care were immediately investigated and appropriate action taken. This includes hundreds of thousands of dollars that were spent on upgrading housing and stable facilities in early 2011.
The producers completely reject the accusations that twenty seven animals died due to mistreatment during the making of the films. Extraordinary measures were taken to make sure that animals were not used during action sequences or any other sequence that might create undue stress for the animals involved. Over fifty five per cent of all shots using animals in The Hobbit are in fact computer generated; this includes horses, ponies, rabbits, hedgehogs, birds, deer, elk, mice, wild boars, and wolves.
The American Humane Association (AHA) was on hand to monitor all use of animals by the production. No animals died or were harmed on set during filming.
We regret that some of these accusations by wranglers who were dismissed from the film over a year ago are only now being brought to our attention. We are currently investigating these new allegations and are attempting to speak with all parties involved to establish the truth.
A decade ago there were accusations, later found to be false by New Zealand officials, that horses were abused during the making of Jackson’s Lord Of The Rings films. The American Humane Association told the AP today that they knew of no animals being harmed during the filming of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey — the first film in the trilogy that opens December 14 — but that it had no oversight over the facilities where animals were kept — on a property outside Wellington, New Zealand. The Hobbit films were shot in New Zealand and the UK.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.



I don’t believe you, Peter!
So as soon as anyone accuses someone of doing something, you automatically believe them, without attempting to use any reasoning whatsoever?
It’s the right – nay, the responsibility – of everyone on the net.
I bet you would be great on a jury.. The Prosecutor would come out, issue his opening statement, you would stand up and say “fry him!” before the defense could even present a case… you are soo insightful. There should be more like you in this world.
Really Josh?? Peter is the one that you don’t believe? When it seems more fishy that the wranglers chose a few weeks before the premiere to bring this accusation to light (when these claimed events happened over a year ago).
If you actually read the articles on the subject, you will see that only two animals were fatally injured due to stable facilities (which were fixed immediately after) and all the other moralities were natural deaths (old age) or illness. This whole thing reeks of a cash grab by the wranglers.
a human died on the set of expendables 2 and another on the new lone ranger. so who gives a shit about an animal dying?
How does one have anything to do with the other?
This sort of remark is disgusting. Piss off.
No life, including an innocent animal that has no free will, should be lost because of a movie. Pig
To Steve1, Animals ARE just as important as human beings are. Gosh, your mother must’ve barked when you were born, judging by your indifference.
“To Steve1, Animals ARE just as important as human beings are.”
If you really believe that, by all means feed yourself to jackals.
Yes, right. After all, they need to eat too.
No, animals are not as important as humans. You have a twisted moral code. Animals should be treated humanely, but to equate them with humans is moronic.
it’s a frickin’ lizard! Get real!
I agree that the upper poster should piss off. And hard. Ignorant worm.
Why does it have to be either/or? Indifference to suffering of any living thing is a cause for concern.
I think it’s hilarious that the two people who resort to personal attacks on steve1 in the *defense of animals* use animal names to insult him (the humble worm and the noble pig!)
Didn’t the humans have a choice as to whether or not to be on the sets?
PETA isn’t credible; they’re more like a fanatical cult than a normal advocacy organization.
PETA makes the PTC look professional.
PETA shouldn’t complain about animal deaths, as they have “rescued” many animals from moderate and even good conditions, just to “mercy kill” them.
They are responsible for many more “preventable” deaths than the movie even if the full 27 are accurate. (And probably responsible for more deaths within the same frame of time as it took to film the movie.)
Just for the record: the claim isn’t that any animals were harmed during the filming. The claim is that after filming, the facilities where the animals were sent to was sub-standard and they were injured.
That’s a tricky one.. Jackson and the production house has no real control over the facility after an animal leaves their direct care. It’s sad, and they may look for better facilities in the future, but it seems to me as though the gripe should be with those farms, not with Peter Jackson.
The key line in that statement is: “No animals were harmed or killed ON SET DURING FILMING”. That is not a denial that animals died while being housed. Methinks they knew all along that the animals were being mistreated, and hoped to sweep it under the carpet. Now it has surfaced at the most unfortunate time – just a week away from the premier. Karma is a bitch. Any animal lovers should boycott these films.
You thinks? And you have some proof to speak of? Accusations by someone who was fired which were then filtered through an organization famous for sensationalism does not constitute guilt. Maybe we should boycott your logic instead.
This is my favorite post ever. “boycott your logic”. I love it.
Thanks for making accusations that have no grounding whatsoever. He “must have known about it” and just “swept it under the rug”. Sure, you believe that. And I will not boycott these films. Should I turnover my 2 adopted dogs and cat to the shelter?
If anything it will make the movie more attractive to viewers, bad publicity is the same as good publicity. Most just need to read the article before posting…
Boy, this film has been kind of cursed, hasn’t it? Delays, lawsuits, labor strife, personnel changes, apparent livestock issues. Then again, CASABLANCA and TITANIC both had turbulent journeys to the screen. They did alright.
CASABLANCA and TITANIC and don’t forget RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK got in trouble with Kubrick’s daughter, no less, but that film went on to do okay:
“John Baxter in his book Steven Spielberg An Unauthorized Biography mentions another problem the production team faced when Vivian Kubrick, daughter of famous director Stanley Kubrick, complained because of the way snakes had been treated. She claimed that many snakes had been crashed from the feet of the cast and crew. She even climbed up on the stage and said: “Steven, this is so cruel”. Spielberg from his side felt terribly embarrassed and reassured her that they would be looked after fine, but she wasn’t pleased with that, so she rang the RSPCA to complain. The whole film ground to a halt and it was closed down for a whole day. In order to continue shooting Spielberg ordered measures to be taken. So a row of plastic dustbins as far as the eye could see around the stage, and in the bottom of each one there was a little bit of straw and a leaf of lettuce, and each one had about three garter snakes.”
That’s from:
http://www.theraider.net/films/raiders/making_5_production.php
Who cares if they killed a few animals. We kill them every day when we eat them! Plus, wouldn’t you rather see a real animal onscreen than a stupid CGI version?
You are a sociopath.
You are easily baited.
Sadly, the comment is not really baiting. Assume 27 animals did die during the production of the films (off set or on set location irrelevant). The number of animals that died to feed the crew and people commenting on this article outstrips the 27 by a factor of hundreds, if not thousands.
Actually… obvious troll is obvious… you want me to pull that hook out of your mouth?
Sadly? You mean they shouldn’t get to eat meat? So, instead of hurting po widdle aminals, they should forgo complete proteins and skip out on some of their amino acids?
I believe you, Peter!
Yes, no animals were harmed on set DURING FILMING…we get that. But, that wasn’t the accusation.
The Lord of the Rings/Hobbit movies are SO good – I honestly don’t care if they killed 1000 animals to make them – It worth it! PETA – stop your whining and try to address some real problems in the world.
I am not a supporter of PETA either. However, animal agriculture on a global scale (as opposed to using this smaller event as a PR vehicle) is a huge contributor to many of the problems in the world, including pollution (land, air and water), escalating human health costs dealing with chronic conditions largely related to diet, increased risk of future pandemics, and starvation / nutrition problems in third world countries.
I do agree that the movies are really good and look forward to the Hobbit trilogy.
I am soo glad there are people in this world like you. It shows the rest of us how not to be evil. Thank you for your example. You are the comic relief.
The movies are awesome? Kill as many as you need? Really? Hope you enjoy your next few incarnations as animals subjected to people like you, sport.
The AHA follows the lead of Hollywood management And all these fools who say it is only animals so who cares…I care and hope you choke on your steak.
I almost did, but fate saw fit to see me through. Apparently, in the greater scheme, I’m more important than the cow I ate. Yum.
You know what I hate more than an animal that won’t get on my plate? Sanctimonious punks.
Its simple really, when you are trying to bring attention to your cause you point the finger at the people with money. Poor farmers won’t be ordered to give millions to Animal rights causes, but if you accuse a big company it gets your cause in the news, makes it easier for you to get donations, and provides a bigger target for the cause.
This is the real world. People and animals died from many causes ranging from murder to accidents to natural causes. Even if you do take every precaution to be humane we’re all mortal.
I read about these accusations months ago, they did not wait until the last minute. I agree it should have been brought to light earlier but I will wait to spend my money on watching this movie until it is investigated. I do not believe the movie industry is overly concerned about animal welfare where money is concerned. I also have the right to not spend money on movies where animals may have been harmed.
I care and I bet Tolkien would care too. You are an in feeling jackass.
Sorry, but I doubt it. Tolkien was an old-fashioned sort. He’d have probably just wanted to eat them.
oh boo hoo, animals die every day, get over it. and if you read the story, the guy complaining accepted the job to care for these animals and failed them, failed his employer’s prayer and ultimately failed himself. he is a bitter person stuck with so much guilt. and these animal worshippers are attention whores, all the way, and they play these victims, these animals and their caretakers. they are shameless with their over sensationalized propoganda. the peta crowd are just a bunch of carnies barking for sympathy to gather charity for their fabricated reality and meaningless salaries. disgusting.
Over sensationalized? It’s these kinds of words that stigmatize compassion and standing up against what is inhumane. Would it be okay to slice a human’s throat and skin her while conscious? To stomp on the necks of our children who are born deformed? To puncture a man’s eyeball out of it’s socket? No, right? But what if the human is mentally retarded and will never be able to contribute to society in any beneficial, intelligent way? Still not acceptable, right? Because intelligence is not a factor. Regardless of how intelligent a human is, they can feel the pain and therefore it is deemed immoral and deplorable. So why don’t the same standards apply to all sentient beings? Because a pig, a cow, and a chicken are delicious? Because it is easy to “get over it” when we only see what’s served on our plate and ignore the reality of what is going on in the factory farms. Because it’s so much more convenient to keep our bubbles intact and avoid a painful truth… Are you sure that maybe it’s not so much the activists that are “over sensationalists” but that it is you that is desensitized?
THIS IS WHY, animal rights activists and certainly PETA aren’t able to get more done. Comparing a farmer not taking adequate care of animals to “stomping on the necks of deformed children”, is ludicrous, disgusting and frankly, how can you expected to be taken seriously once you say something like that?
You mean they didn’t just CGI all the animals? I’m seriously surprised.
Kinda sad news I love animals ..
Thats what they get for letting Smigel/Gollum care for the horses. He couldn’t even take proper care of a stupid ring!
I wonder if the PETA proponents and you ARA types ever stopped to think that in any 10 steps you take you probably kill dozens if not hundreds or thousands of microscopic lives. Oh, the HORROR! You should never walk or brush your teeth! Murderers!!
Lol. What buffoonery. Don’t anthropomorphize.
Now, now. Everyone knows that hobbits are kind to their animals.
The Hobbit is a film. Peter Jackson is a filmmaker. If the animals didn’t die during the making of the film, then the situation doesn’t relate to them.
Silly, but true.
“Five Horses, A Couple of Goats, and A Chicken With Chronic Hypertension Die on A New Zealand family farm” just doesn’t have the same sensationalism. Imagine that.
PETA’s motive is transparent in tbeir press release. They dislike ANY animal use in film: “Jackson could have made the Hobbit without using single animal- and he should have.”
It’s not about animal deaths on a New Zealand farm for them. They’re whupping up their extremist “no animal use” fringers at the expense of the Hobbit production.
Anytime PETA is involved with an animal iissue or accusation, check the known facts, circumstances and review the logic applied. They inpugn motives and stretch the data to accomplish ther own ends. The people on the farm 180 miles away are resposnible. If Peter Jackson and crew were negligent with animals would it not have been evident already in Lord of the Rings? Given how careful they are on everything else, I hardly think the charge is credible.
I completely agree. Is it really 27 animal deaths or simply the two horses reported? Either way, the animals were not harmed on set. The way PETA works is like a troll on the internet, looking anywhere and everywhere for any possible mistreatment of animals. I’m sick and tired of people giving paying them attention. I’m fine with Deadline reporting about the death of the animals due to its connection to The Hobbit but we don’t need to know what PETA thinks about the whole thing. The less we hear about those idiots, the better the world would be.
The most disturbing aspect for me is not the knee-jerk reaction to unsubstantiated accusations, or the VERY carefully worded denial by Peter Jackson, nor is it even the extreme level of ignorance of some of the posters equating entertainment with nutritional needs. Rather, it is the almost unbelievable proportion of posters who appear to actually take delight in animal cruelty. Those who taunt others by declaring how they glean pleasure from animals’ suffering… You know who you are, and let me tell you: You are extremely worrying and emotionally immature individuals.