UPDATE: The PAC 12 sports network has responded to a strike action and picketing by IATSE members outside USC and other conference member schools. The network said it respects the right for workers to decide on union representation and pledged to continue maintain “an exciting and creative work environment”. IATSE said earlier today it had set up pickets at USC in Los Angeles and several other schools on the West Coast and in Arizona because PAC 12 Network is “an unfair employer” that uses non-union workers in areas covered by IATSE. PAC 12 Network has contracts with Time Warner Cable, Comcast, DISH Network, Bright House Networks, among others, to show non-pro sports out of the Western U.S.
Here’s PAC 12 Net’s statement:
We respect an individual’s right to decide whether to be represented by a union. Regardless of how they decide, we will remain focused on creating an environment that is inclusive, respectful and allows us to have direct relationships with our staff and contractors. We are building a robust enterprise that offers competitive compensation, an exciting and creative work environment, and growing work opportunities for industry professionals, campus staff and students from our universities for many years to come.
And IATSE’s statement:
IATSE International President Matthew D. Loeb, after polling the IA’s Executive Board, has declared the PAC 12 Network to be an unfair employer and has authorized a strike against the network. PAC 12 Network derives its income from cable and satellite broadcasts, including advertising fees, of member college and university sporting events, including men’s football and men’s and women’s basketball.
Said President Loeb, “The skills and commitment of the broadcast technicians we represent are unparalleled. These folks go above and beyond to guarantee the viewers the experience they deserve, and these workers deserve the dignity of a contract that secures their interests in return.”
As of Saturday, Dec. 8, strike lines will be set up at Arizona State University, Tempe; Oregon State University, Corvallis; University of Oregon, Eugene; University of Washington, Seattle, and University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
The aim of the strike is to establish area standard wages and benefits for daily hire technical employees of the PAC 12 Network working on live sporting events.
Since going on the air in September 2012, the Network has employed technicians represented by the IA at venues of the ten PAC 12 Conference institutions in the IA’s jurisdiction. However, they have crewed many events in IA markets using non-union labor, or a combination of non-union and covered labor side by side on the same job. Those technicians working without the protection of an IA contract for the PAC 12 network receive generally lower wages, no benefits, and are without the job protections afforded by an IA contract.
The broadcast membership of the IATSE locals in the affected markets authorized their leadership to negotiate concessions with its signatory crewing providers in order to accommodate the stated needs of the PAC 12 Network. Despite these accommodations and other IA attempts to reach out to the management of the PAC 12 Network they have refused to communicate with the union.
The IATSE is an International Union that represents members employed in the stagecraft, motion picture and television production, and trade show industries throughout the United States, its Territories, and Canada.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.
IATSE International President Matthew D. Loeb, after polling the IA’s Executive Board, has declared the PAC 12 Network to be an unfair employer and has authorized a strike against the network. PAC 12 Network derives its income from cable and satellite broadcasts, including advertising fees, of member college and university sporting events, including men’s football and men’s and women’s basketball.

So if we’re not in the union we are not allowed to work?
Feel free to work all the non union shows you want. But you will be paying for your own health care, pension and taxes. Most non union shows are 1099 and you are not covered by workers comp because you are an independent contractor.
Jesus… is IATSE out to ruin the holidays for EVERYONE? This is what, their third sponsored strike in the last month? How’s bout taking December off, and letting people enjoy their respective holidays with their families, and giving the lawyers a break.
Thanks to a hockey strike and losing a large part of my College basketball formally with Fox sports “an IATSE signatory” to the Pac 12 network I have plenty of time off in December. Happy holidays!!
It’s only a matter of time before a major studio pulls out of Southern Cal and moves EVERYTHING to the south east. Tax credits won’t be enough to make them stay, between the unions and the high cost of doing biz in California, it’s only a matter of time.
The ESPN execs in San Francisco are not going to let someone shadow them and give up their jobs in order to save money. Why should the techs at the arena do it?
Bullies!
Pac 12 executives or, broadcast technicians?
Maybe IATSE can get DirecTV to carry the PAC-12 network while they’re at it.
pac-12 uses students to run camera while local camera guys sit at home
IATSE wouldn’t care if monkeys were operating the cameras as long as IATSE gets paid.
That’s not true.. pac-12 have been using IATSI guys and other non – IATSI but experienced guys. No your facts dude..
I’ve never seen that done on all the events I have worked. I have worked many, and the only students we have hired, to my knowledge are runners. Maybe you have some info that I do not. I was only there, where were you?
I am trying to make a living, don’t think this IATSE thing is going to help me. Probably good for them, but not me. I thought they were supposed to protect the little guy. Feels like they are trying to keep me down.
I hope they don’t pull a twinkie and get everyone fired. Unions spout alot of BS at times, and it all boils down to. “As long as we get our cut” They couldn’t care less about indiviual workers, as long as whoever replaces them is also paying protection. I mean dues.
Everyone should have a right to work as long as it doesn’t break a legally binding labor contract.
Unions are NOT the enemy. If it wasn’t for ‘collective bargaining’, the State of California would not feel the pressure to ensure that ALL employees are afforded meal breaks, a 5 minute break for ever hour worked, decent minimum wages, protection from unsafe working conditions, etc.. If working conditions were left up to the corporations and stock holders we’d be locked in warehouses and burned to death like over 700 human beings were, in India, in the past few years. It’s sad to read such ignorant rants from people who’ve, most likely, never worked or lived in a time when employees (in this country) had NO work place protections from abuse.
We need to stop confusing ‘private business union representation’ with those who are ‘government employee civil service union members’. The difference is like night and day. One contract is paid for through the profits of private enterprise which exist because of the hard work and toil of it’s dedicated employees, and one is paid for by tax payers with contracts negotiated by those with a conflict of interest. Big difference.
We, that means all of us who care about the future of the American work force, should be supportive of those who stand up for for pay and working conditions. I’ve never seen anyone refuse minimum wage. Except perhaps illegal aliens who will work for 20 dollars a day. Is THAT the what the American work for should strive for? Is THAT what all of you condemning Unions wants? Without the constant pressure from Unions to continue moving forward, there is nowhere to go but — BACKWARDS.
I’m curious, how many of you that are so anti union even work? How many of you are 30 years old and still live with their “mommy”? It’s time for gen x to grow the F up, get into the ‘real’ workforce and make America better. Oh sure, working at Taco Bell (yes, you can be thankful to union workers for that minimum wage you get) may pay for your gas in the car that mommy and daddy bought you because they feel guilty about raising you to be such a loser, but, it won’t buy you a house or pay for your (if you breed) child’s college education. That is IF you ever move out of mommy’s house and GTFU.
Oh yeah, BTW, I’m a proud IATSE member who backs anything that my union does. Without them, I’d be working with $7 an hour losers like the idiots that are complaining about something that they know nothing about. Instead my co-workers are responsible, tax paying, productive Americans that are raising families and don’t sit around on the couch complaining that the rest of the world owes them something. We work for a living, building businesses into successful enterprises where ALL Americans benefit. I’ll think of you chumps next time I get my car washed, or order a taco at Taco Bell from you. Hah. Idiots.
Don’t confuse the work of real union laborers who years ago won the rights all if us enjoy as standard with the modern day efforts of IATSE. Opportunistic, manipulative, organized bullying and downright illegal, IASTE’s tactics should be called into question by the courts. The playing field is not level for the worker or the employer.
Typical union BS looking down on the less fortunate. Just disgusting. Typical thing as long as I’ve got mine, to hell with everyone else that isn’t in a union. Just wait, they killed Twinkies (Teamsters not the bakers union separate Twinkie truck, lol) like the guy above said, they’ll move the whole show out of California, down south. The only ones that will be left in So Cal will be the executives.
Remember you can make movies ANYWHERE in the world even in China (Iron Man 3) audiences really could care less where a movie was made or whether it was made by a union worker.
While the history of unions in the US have indeed made for better working conditions across the board in the last century by positively affecting certain state laws like California’s, those who say that the union only cares about their cut these days are not wrong either.
Unions are motivated to stay in business. Union’s business is to separate the employers from their workers, creating a barrier that they then have to negotiate and get paid for doing so. The fact is that compared to the Sports Video Group, the unions have done virtually NOTHING to ensure their worker’s safety on the remote job site of sports television productions in the last 15 years. Why? Because it makes them no money to get involved in that aspect of the business.
Why shouldn’t a student on a PAC12 campus get a chance to participate in broadcasts coming from their school? The network is owned by the conference which is owned by the schools. It is THEIR product. What has the IATSE done to ensure training of new people into positions in this industry? NOTHING because it makes them no money.
I still respect the right of workers to decide how they choose to benefit from their work situation, but if you join the union you loose that right and have to get behind a bunch of old guys who want all the work for themselves and won’t teach you their craft for fear of being replaced someday. Meanwhile you are still paying dues. Who wins in this scenario? The union not the worker.
Union workers are those people with decent middle class wages and good health care. But service workers like the IATSE Arena workers are just as likely to be laid off as anyone else. They are not public service union workers and they get no job guarantees. The only reason they are hired back is because they do a superlative job. This is because they have put a career into learning the correct way do do things. They are professionals. Pac 12 is hiring students to shadow these workers in the hopes of replacing them for 1/4 the wage. That is why the union is having these actions. Pretty simple. How would you react to your boss doing that? This is not about the union, it is simply about job security and being able to live a normal life. The ESPN execs in San Francisco are not going to let someone shadow them and give up their jobs in order to save money.
I’m delighted IA has found its voice (and perhaps its balls). For too many years they’ve been the tools of the media conglomerates. Go IA!
I hope the multi-million dollar facelift they are doing to their building on sunset is being done by qualified workers, who are receiving fair pay, benefits, and are being afforded all the union rules. IATSE are a joke. Wake up members, and maybe ask yourself, where is the money coming from to pay for this “necessary” construction? The IATSE organization’s leadership is a whose who of people who have done very little to nothing in the industry. Check their representatives resumes who are lobbying you to walk off the job. They have a job now, because very few worked on much the industry. And while they spend their time making you feel like a victim, no benefits etc., wouldn’t you rather have more money go into your own pocket, rather then theirs?? i can tell you with certainty, there is a reason nobody wants to use them, and why the majority of their members have no issue working non-union jobs…the ones who work on a regular basis see them EXACTLY for who they are. And they complain about all the production leaving the state…joke, joke, joke.
This is pure garbage and lies. I have worked for pac 12 network and have received a rate higher than my usual rate. I never accept a job lower than union wages. Pac 12 does not pay lower wages. IATSE is just pisser that they dont crew the show.