The latest contribution to the speculation about a possible Apple TV comes from a survey commissioned by Morgan Stanley which quizzed 1,568 heads of households in the U.S. in September. It found that 47% were at least “somewhat interested” in buying a TV from Apple, analyst Katy Huberty reports. That’s impressive: Only 23% were as interested in the iPhone when the investment firm conducted a similar survey in February 2007, and 21% were interested in the iPad in April 2010. And the findings about an Apple TV may be conservative: “the survey was conducted ahead of an actual product announcement,” Huberty says. Still, respondents on average said that they’d be willing to pay $1,060 for an Apple TV, which is 20% more than they paid for their current sets. (About 46% were willing to go over $1,000 and 10% would cough up more than $2,000.) That’s “an incremental $13B revenue opportunity” for Apple. But consumers might have to pay more than $1,300 for a 45-inch set in order for Apple to generate a gross profit margin of 40% — below its current 44% — the analyst says. Does Apple need to control all aspects of the TV offering, the way it does with, say, music and the iPod? Not necessarily. “Apple is most likely to sell a TV with an integrated digital media receiver and Apple operating system,” says Huberty. “Ease-of-use and searchability of content are key areas in which Apple can differentiate according to our survey.”


if people only knew about what Roku does for 50 bucks…
I think they are talking to the wrong consumers. I don’t believe this even remotely represents the majority of the population.
They probably asked a bunch of Fanboys waiting on a line for the latest iThingy.
and it will the TV that everyone will knock off
Who were the subjects of this poll? Morons standing line all night for a phone?
I’ve put off buying a new set until the Apple Set is released, and I don’t even know when that will be. Imagine buying a new Blackberry and subsidizing it for 2 years right before the iPhone was announced. I certainly don’t want that to happen to me. The iPhone changed the idea of what a smartphone could be. The iPad changed the idea of what a tablet could be. I think it’s safe for anyone to assume that if Apple is going to enter the television market, they’d only do it if the could change the perception of what a television could be.
Oh, Apple is God. Or Satan to the drones at the slave labor camp called Foxcom.
Would these Apple fanboy and girl idiots respond the same way if black South Africans were manufacturing Reeboks under these same conditions in the 1980s?
If Apple announced they were going to sell logs of shit with the Apple Logo, then there would be people in droves waiting in anticipation. While the company is obviously great, this is the space that they are the last to the party for. Smart televisions exist. I just bought a great television and use my Xbox for Vudu, Netflix, Pandora, etc… Sorry Tim, you guys were just a little too late on this one.
Can I get the iLog engraved?
-RnsW
Not me!
And I grew up on Apple.
Roku is where it’s at.
TV and Movie studios won’t let Apple TV do what iTunes did to the music industry. If it starts to pull market share away from cable telcos and broadcast viewership, content agreements may go “bye-bye”.
Then the much touted Apple TV will join the ash heap of other useless electronics.
… said Apple TV
Why would someone pay 20% more for a TV that will look and do the same thing it will 5 years from now? SGoes to show how iSheep can be brainwashed so easily. Sorry, I’ll stick to my Samsung and Sony TVs. They seem to know what consumers want and not profess what consumers want.
Take this poll standing outside a normal business, not an Apple Store. Results will likely vary.