UPDATE, 3:39 PM: Just hours after a federal judge today granted Warner Bros, MGM and others a temporary restraining order against mockbuster Age Of The Hobbits, WB hailed the court action as a victory over producer Global Asylum’s “cynical business model.” Warner Bros is the distributor of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s novel. Here is Warner Bros’ statement:
“This victory underscores the importance of protecting the unique work of our industry’s creative community from companies like Asylum, whose cynical business model is designed to profit from the work of others. Their intent to create confusion in the marketplace on the eve of release of ‘The Hobbit,’ one of the most anticipated films of the year, has met with defeat.”
PREVIOUSLY, 2:47 PM: There will only be one Hobbit on the screen this week and that will be Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Warner Bros, New Line Cinema, MGM and producer Saul Zaentz today were granted the temporary restraining order they sought against Global Asylum’s mockbuster Age Of The Hobbits (read the order here). “There is substantial likelihood that consumers will be confused by Age Of Hobbits and mistakenly purchase the film intending to purchase The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey“, said federal judge Philip Gutierrez today. “Indeed, Plaintiffs have presented evidence that Asylum’s other films have caused confusion among consumers, who mistakenly purchase Asylum films intending to purchase a different film”.
Earlier this year, Global Asylum was sued by Universal over the resemblance of their American Battleship to the studio’s big-budget Battleship. Commonly in these cases, the mockbuster producers cite fair use and artistic license to plead their point of view. But usually after all the legal filings and bluster, these cases end up being settled. Not this time. Age Of The Hobbits was scheduled to be released tomorrow, but now the DVDs and Blu-rays will stay in their boxes until at least a January 28 hearing on the matter. “The release date of December 11 — three days before the release of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey — provides additional evidence that Asylum intended to profit by associating its film with Plaintiffs’ work. The close proximity of the release dates demonstrates a clear intent to capitalize on the extensive attention that the Hobbit Marks will receive leading up to the release of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. At oral argument, counsel for Asylum admitted that the temporal proximity of the release dates was ‘not a coincidence’,” the judge added.
Related: Universal Sues To Stop Fifty Shades of Grey Porn “Rip-Off”
After filing their copyright infringement case November 7, Warner Bros, MGM and Zaentz had a survey conducted on November 18-19 by Nielsen to see whether people were confused by the titles. The result showed that of the 1200 people interviewed, “approximately 30 to 40 percent of survey respondents exhibited confusion about the source of Age Of Hobbits,” noted the judge today. That seemed to seal the TRO deal for the court. “The very interest at issue in a trademark infringement case such as this one is avoiding the public from being confused or deceived about a product. As such, a TRO enjoining Asylum’s release of Age Of Hobbits is in the public interest because it will prevent consumer confusion,” Gutierrez said.
Andrew Thomas and Farnaz Alemi of LA firm Jenner & Block are representing Warner Bros, New Line Cinema, New Line Productions, MGM and producer Saul Zaentz. Scott Meehan is representing Global Asylum.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


NOOOOO! Now what am I supposed to watch if I need a Hobbit-fix this Friday?
But what fool goes looking to BUY a movie that was JUST released to the movie theaters? If they don’t have the common sense to figure THAT out, then that’s just too bad! It would be one thing if Age of Hobbits was released to DVD the exact same day that The Hobbit: An unexpected Journey was released to DVD; I could understand that.
It’ll still be on DVD when The actual Hobbit is, filling up shelves with unbought copies. I disagree with this decision, but it’s always been clear that Global Asylum’s profits are made up of the $20 bills of confused grandparents trying to buy something as a present
Not looking to stir up mountains of awards season-style controversy, but I’m just going to go on record here and say that Asylum’s “Mega Piranha” is better than “Piranha 3DD.”
Fools who live in trailer homes and who shop at Wal-Mart. That’s the base that these knock-offs cater to.
~
Coat
There’s something hilarious about the studio that just turned a novella into three lushly-padded movies calling anyone cynical
^^^ HA! Sad but true.
Hahahahahahahahaha!!
Have you read the book? If it was a direct adaptation, 1) none of the Dwarves would have any development (In the book they barely talk), 2) Ian McKellen’s character would inexplicably be gone for over half of the story with little to no explanation as to what he’s doing, and 3) the main villain (spoilers!) is killed by a character who has little to no character development. Also Let’s face it, The Hobbit, as a story, could use a little reworking and adjustments.
I don’t think you understand the meaning of the word cynical.
What if they were to change it to Rage of the Hobbits and make it a parody? Would they be able to release it as a spoof? Yes they would because it would be protected by the First Amendment.
Funny, but I think they’d actually have to prove parody status. Hard to parody something they couldn’t possibly have seen yet.
They can do a parody of the book it’s very famous and easy to spoof.
Ah yes, the studio that brought you HANGOVER 2 and HANGOVER 3 is now suing someone for making a “cynical” money grab…makes perfect sense.
Thank you Warner Brothers, for letting us know just how stupid your target audiences are. You are who you sell too. If you can look in pone of my ears and see light on the other side, I’m a consumer of Warner Bporthers drech. All of the Bobbit movies have been lame. Any knockoff can only be celebrated as a further misguided waste of resources. And as for callling WB’s Bibbit one of the “most anticipated” films of the year–Please–there’s more comfort derived from an impending bowel movement.
Lame move, WB. Asylum’s movies are hysterical (often hysterically awful) and highly entertaining. And anyone who thinks “Transformers” is better than “Transmorphers” has not taste. No one sees these movies because they “confuse” them with the original – who could be confused about renting a movie that just arrived in theaters? The only “confused” people are people who traffic in pirate copies and are used to getting features on DVD when they come out, and they can go F themselves.
Does anyone have any idea what the Lord of the Rings marathon screenings earned this weekend? I can’t find it anywhere…
Anybody who owns a trademark or copyright knows that it’s HIS/HER/ITS job to protect it, not the government’s. Actions can range from a cease-and-desist letter to a suit like this. WB may anger the cynics, but it’s the only way to go.
And to make it even worse, they tried to base their defense on how their Hobbits were different than that of Tolkien’s Hobbits, completely forgetting that Tolkien created Hobbits specifically for his world. It’s not like Hobbits are like trolls, goblins, and other common creatures, they’re IP creations. It would be like saying that my Kryptonians are different than that of the Superman comics.
Actually, very little in Middle-Earth is truly original. Tolkien borrowed from a great many sources, never making a secret of it. One of the things borrowed includes the word hobbit.
So if they have no claim to the name hobbit, then it’s hard to see how they can argue against characters that have little resemblance to the Jackson film hobbits.
The crux of their argument seems to be that our film is far superior and shouldn’t have to share shelf space with the inferior Asylum product.
This isn’t about copyright, though. The plot of “Age of the Hobbits” has nothing to do with the Tolkien mythos and, to really put a fine point on it, it’s been proven here and there that Tolkien actually did NOT originate the word “Hobbit,” though he thought he did. There are references in earlier texts that use “hobbit” in the same sense as “hobgoblin.” There’s even an interesting reference on Wikipedia that suggests it comes from the Old English word for “hole builder.”
Yes, Asylum’s claims have nothing to do with that, but I still think this is going to be proven in favor of Asylum regardless. This is what actual litigation is all about – who has the best lawyer.
My studio already has a spinoff planned we are making The Grabbit about magical creatures who grab all the money they can get their greedy grubby little hands on. Grabbits are very entertaining they resemble Hobbits but the only thing Grabbits are interested in is money. They love gold and silver and diamonds but they will also steal your cash and your credit or debit card numbers and your bank account numbers. Beware The Grabbit! He’s coming to steal your money and there’s nothing you can do to stop him!
Wondering if they have other films such as “This Is 41″, “Life With Pie” or “Less Miserables” that can fill this hole in their distribution schedule with