
EXCLUSIVE: After tapping his own background in journalism to write and produce the Oscar-winning The Hurt Locker and now Zero Dark Thirty with Kathryn Bigelow, Mark Boal‘s next project will be to try to empower other journalists to see their reporting form the basis for screen projects. He’s forming Page One Productions, a development and production company to acquire and shepherd topical TV and features based on other reporters’ stories. Boal will use his association with CAA and Management 360 to get things up and running.
At a panel moderated by Billy Ray at the WGA Theater last night in Beverly Hills, Boal explained: “I want to marry up screenwriters with reporters, and try to encourage movies that plug into the culture. And if more screenwriters became producers, I think that would be a good thing. That’s assuming of course that this film does okay. If it bombs, forget I said any of this.”
It certainly doesn’t look like Zero Dark Thirty will be fading out of sight anytime soon with the accolades the film has so far won from the New York Film Critics Circle, National Board of Review and other regional critics bodies in anticipation of its January 13 release. I moderated an Oscar screening panel last week for the film with Bigelow, Boal and their stars Jessica Chastain, Jason Clarke and Kyle Chandler. It was amusing to see Boal squirm on his stool as he was peppered about specifics he said he could not divulge, as secretive as the CIA agents he wrote about. But I told him that I thought this film broke some intriguing ground for journalism-based film fare. Most great fact-based films like All The President’s Men come out way after the fact and are based on well-plowed dirt, but Boal actually turned over hard ground to find this story. He came in with the journalism background and his articles formed the basis for In The Valley Of Elah and The Hurt Locker. And he and Bigelow moved very quickly after they threw out the project they were ready to sell — the unsuccessful post-9/11 hunt for Osama bin Laden in Tora Bora — the night Bin Laden’s death was reported, and quickly turned out another script that has a far more satisfying third act. Both Boal and Bigelow told me they worked quickly, but with the full understanding of the burden of making a film about an untold part of the story with fresh facts that had better hold up years in the future when reams of books get written and inevitable new findings are disclosed. He also seemed disappointed by the early reports that inferred he was simply handed the story on a silver platter by the Obama White House.
I’ve read some criticism about whether the water-boarding depicted in the opening scene was real, and just like the brickbats thrown at Ben Affleck’s terrific Argo on whether this or that specific thing happened exactly as depicted, some of this just comes with the territory during Oscar campaigning. Routinely, fact-based films like A Beautiful Mind are always put on the defensive. To me, these films are obligated to entertain as well as inform, and Zero Dark Thirty‘s opening scene frames a highly controversial interrogation process of a prisoner with terror ties that leads to invaluable information about bin Laden’s whereabouts. It is presented objectively and invites viewers to make up their own minds on whether it was worth it or inhumane and barbaric. It also lends insight into the conflicted characters played by Chastain and Clarke, who pulled the strings. Including the challenge Chastain and Clarke encountered in not being able to chat up or even know the real identity of the CIA characters they were playing, Zero Dark Thirty is one of the most interesting melds of journalism and filmmaking in a major studio feature that I can recall.


I attended the AMPAS screening on Saturday. I was disappointed in the film and was upset by the inaccuracies in how the CIA and Military operate when it comes to Top Secret missions. CIA operatives would NOT be casually discussing intelligence in a popular hotel restaurant in the middle of Pakistan, nor would “Maya” give the Seal Team all the details of the mission, months before the operation. The film seems to say that the CIA was the only agency responsible for finding and killing UBL. Where was the NSA, and the U.S. Military Intelligence in this story? Not that this is a transcript of the events, but I’ve always suspected Mr. Boal’s creds as a “Journalist” and fact trashing screenwriter. It may sell tickets and get the WGA and AMPAS to nominate him again, but so far everything he’s written on the U.S. Military seems to telegraph his loathing.
Agreed. The idea of her briefing these guys on the operation DID NOT ring true among many other things.
This is not Best Picture time. Sorry, far from it.
Have you read Steven Zeitchik’s article about the film and the research that went into it in the L.A. Times (Sunday, 12/9)?
“Where was the NSA, and the U.S. Military Intelligence in this story?”
They were/are there, just that it doesn’t make for a exciting CIA story that the public has a bias towards. This is not a true story. The technical stuff, though *incredibly important*, is just too boring as concluded by the directors.
how is his movie an “original screenplay”? He wrote a screenplay based on a book then changed the ending and ditched the book. This journalist is cutting out the authors he based his material on in an attempt to have a better chance at winning another award, then turning around and trying to make up for it with this self-aggrandizing premise for a prod company.
This movie is pure propaganda meant to further solidify the “fake” story that they supposedly killed bin laden in 2011 and threw him in the ocean. Do your homework and you’ll find many who know that he died back in early 2002.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta said – based on a video of bin Laden that had been made in either late November or early December of 2001 – that he appeared to be in the last stages of kidney failure.
And remember the movie Syriana? Well, in October 2008, former CIA case officer Robert Baer (Clooney won gold playing him) suggested in passing during an interview on National Public Radio that bin Laden was no longer among the living. When Baer was asked about this, he said: “Of course he’s dead.”
And when they supposedly kill the baddest man on the planet and they just dump him in the ocean and never show you his body. Right.
I agree with Open your eyes. Works well as narrative fiction, but that’s the extent of it. Irresponsible filmmaking.
Lots of hating in these comments. I;m an ex reporter/editor producer and don’t know Boal but think he is doing a remarkable job of translating journalism into movies. He is not irresponsible, and what he’s doing has long been missing in our movie verse. These comments are driven by ideology and jealousy. He has the power now to help a lot of journos. Kudos.
I saw a screening of this film recently and have to say I don’t get the hype or the critical acclaim it is getting. It takes one of the most interesting topics in current history and makes it dull, misses most of the most fascinating and dramatic turns in the long hunt for Bin Laden and, in my opinion, fails on every level. The recent National Geographic TV movie was better than this film from an informational standpoint and was more compelling because all that was expected was a procedural account of what went down. This film has the promise of so much more and fails. The Hurt Locker was a great film, no argument there, but it was also a great script filled with tension packed situations, characters and scenes. Mark Bowden’s recent written article about the hunt for and raid of the Bin Laden compound in Vanity Fair was a much better, more dramatic and ultimately more interesting account. There was nothing in this film that wasn’t in that account so for all the high level access reported and bragged about, really there is nothing to show for it. When you hold this film up against other historic accounts of important events, it pales in every comparison. United 93 was edge of your seat filmmaking, and far more “real” than this film and it worked as a docudrama and a movie. The true test of a historical account, since the ending is rarely a secret, is to make it engaging as a work of filmmaking and storytelling. Argo pulled this off brilliantly this year and was highly entertaining while doing it. If Hollywood wants to keep people going to theaters they need to make more Argo’s and a lot less Zero Dark Thirties. Highly entertaining stories always have and always will fill theater seats but it takes skilled filmmakers (directors, writers) not overly hyped movies that are more “important” than entertaining. In the Q&A Bigelow told how originally the film was going to be about the failed attempt to capture Bin Laden at Tora Bora and once he was killed, they switched gears and rushed to write an entirely new film to capitalize on that storyline. This is what TV movies often do and why this effort fails as it feels like a rushed first draft put on film or just what it is, an ok TV movie. I would guess the Tora Bora movie would have been a much more interesting and engaging film particularly after Bin Laden’s death. Further, this I felt this film reduces the Navy Seal Six team to a cluster of cliches as well as most of the CIA characters. Jessica Chastian is always captivating on screen but even she is stuck with a script and filmmaking that doesn’t give her much to do character-wise. If Mark Boal can capitalize on his success by developing more journo-driven films, great, but this is nothing new and in fact magazine articles and news accounts already clog studio development systems. Most are not good or successful, but every now and then one comes out and really works, like Argo. The reason always has to do with the screenplay and the filmmaking. Journalism is not the same as screenwriting. Two very different skills. Mentioned in the article above is “All The President’s Men” which is another classic example of taking a great journalistic event and making an extremely compelling, smart and powerful film by using excellent storytelling, filmmaking and characters putting them up against impossible odds. And, oh, it undoubtedly couldn’t get green lit in today’s studio system since there was no shoot out at the end. Perspective and time definitely made that a classic film that will always be pointed to as an example of how to blend journalism and film. To me there are many better films than Zero Dark Thirty this year so I am puzzled why so many critics are enamored with this film. If this film was made by another director and writer without gold statues so recently, I wonder if the acclaim would be so forthcoming.
I saw this at a screening too and I am so glad I’m not the only one who thought it was dull. Everyone points to all these little details to prove that the film does or does not endorse torture, but in my opinion the main reason we know the director endorses torture is the fact that she made the only interesting/engaging character in the entire film THE TORTURER…and then they basically made that character disappear about 1/4 of the way through the film. My problem with the movie was not that it took a political/moral position that I don’t agree with but that when it did so it didn’t make me angry…just sleepy. I too really liked the National Geographic documentary, hell, I liked the CNN reports more than I liked this film. At least I can invest in Anderson Cooper.
I haven’t seen ZERO DARK THIRTY. I did, however, walk out of THE HURT LOCKER about halfway through, feeling a little queasy with how that film was blending journalism and entertainment.
Don’t listen to these haters. This movie is the real fucking deal. The authenticity and execution is off the charts. This makes ARGO look like amateur hour. It’s absolutely worthy of best picture.
Mike,
You can believe whatever you like, as long as you don’t have access to any Academy voting!
@Academy member Let’s hope he does because obviously your to 1. Jealous or 2. Spiteful to look past yourself and take a movie on it’s own terms. There’s a reason why ZDT is currently the most critically acclaimed film EVER on both Metacritic and RT right now. So I’d say you are in the minority.
Hope you do well, can’t wait to see the film and look forward to see you guys back in UK you deserve to do well best wishes