A&E says that it isn’t Storage Wars that’s fake but the lawsuit from Dave Hester. A month and a half after Hester called the hit reality series a staged “fraud on the public and filed suit against the network and Storage Wars producers for more than $750,000, A&E fired back late last week. And they made their response (read it here) almost all about the money and free speech. “Original and AETN opposed Hester’s demands for more
favorable contract terms, and he was notified that his participation was no longer needed in the Program. Hester then filed this lawsuit against AETN and Original. In a transparent attempt to distract from the issues – and maximize any potential recovery – Plaintiffs’ Complaint tries to convert a garden-variety breach of contract claim into a tabloid-worthy drama, in which Hester portrays himself as a crusading whistleblower. But setting aside the notable inconsistencies in his exaggerated self-portrait, the law does not permit such sophistry,” says the response A&E filed in LA Superior Court on January 24. Using Anti-SLAPP laws and First Amendment free speech guarantees as blunt objects, A&E goes on to say that Hester’s’ Unfair Business Practices cause of action is “meritless” and it wants the court to strip it from his suit.
A&E also claims that if its show is staged or not, which it never really addresses, Hester and his lawyer Marty Singer are wrong about what laws apply to them. “Plaintiffs claim under Section 17200 fails because his only purported basis for claiming that the Defendants’ conduct was ‘illegal’ is an ambiguous reference to the Communications Act of 1934, which has no application to cable television programs,” says the dense document from the defendants. They also say the former Wars star, who claims that he was fired because he complained about the staging the show did, has no right to claim recovery of damages because he didn’t lose anything in not having his contract renewed. They don’t stop there. “Plaintiff lacks standing to bring a claim for “Unfair Business Practices” under Section 17200 on behalf of the general public, because he did not allege and cannot satisfy the requirements for a class action suit,” claims A&E’s lawyers. A&E wants legal fees from Hester for the case. A&E is represented by Kelli Sager, John LeCrone and Michelle Bussarakum of LA firm Davis Wright Tremaine. A hearing is set for February 22 in downtown LA on the request to strike.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


yuuuuuuup!
I don’t get it?
Of course it is staged – the idea that you would not plant something is insane
what are the odds you have a great FIND in those silly lockers
you could NOT make your shows unless you faked it
ALso check out FLIPPING VEGAS – the set work on how they stage these condos and homes is so FUNNY – and so F A K E – how does that get past the notes process??? it is so RIGGED
I like the show but always assumed production went and bought lockers in advance, scoped them out and anything with something good was used on the show.
What an idiot I am! I’ve been duped!! They just plant stuff in expired lockers!!
Guess what – makes more sense. Don’t care.
Foolish man. All ‘reality’ shows have an element of fakery about them, this is television after all. More to the point, everyone knows (even people not working in the industry) all tv shows have an element of fakery. He tried his best poker face during contract negotiations, failed miserably and clearly shows himself to be a sore loser. Like I say, foolish man.
It’s obvious the show is fake since only invited guests are allowed to bid on the lockers. Otherwise the storage lockers would have thousands of out of work actors bidding to get screen time. It’d be a mob scene like The Price Is Right.
And like the price is right, there’s always a script for the discovery of the mystery object. They always make sure to announce the object that gets a visit to the expert.
I’m just getting sick of the fact that 70 percent of A&E’s programming is people bidding on storage lockers. This was the channel that was going to put PBS out of business in the ’80s. Now it’s just showing what happens when people go out of business and quit paying for a storage locker.
The fact that A&E hasn’t ordered a show that investigates why people walked away from some of these storage lockers shows how fake the show gets. If a person knew they were going to stop payment on a locker, why wouldn’t they make a final visit to retrieve the items worth thousands of dollars or even the thousands of dollars they hid in the locker?
A&E needs to declare if this is a reality show or merely a faux-com. How much do they pay the contestants? Are they paying with the show’s money – kinda like the People’s Court? Is there a limit on what they can bid per locker?
How about a little truth to go with the reality?
Many episodes show non-stars also bidding on units. Plus oftentimes they say how many units are up for auction that day and it’s usually way more than we see on tv. So those other units were not bought by the stars of the show, but by other people who were there for the auction.
Once a person gets behind on paying for their locker, the storage facility puts their own lock on the unit so it can’t be striped or emptied before catching up with payment. They take theirs off before the auction, no use in cutting their own locks. They can’t cut and go into a locker until a lien has been filed on the locker.
A&E to Hester: “Nooooooope.”
Storage Wars is not a game show or a contest of skill or wit. People don’t win anything. They purchase the chance to open a locker based on whether or not they possess enough funds to bid on it. And, if someone wanted to bid on a locker every time with more money they’d always get the locker. Therefore, it’s not a game show. But, perhaps a better way to look at the show is to take out the idea that producers may or may not have salted the lockers. If they did not, then the likelihood that a storage locker had anything of value in it would be due only to luck. The participants don’t know who owned it or what’s inside. Everyone gets an equal quick peek inside, and no one has an unfair advantage over anyone else – other than their bank account. Acquiring a locker of any value or no value is still solely based on one’s ability to afford the winning bid — not knowledge, skill, research, or even intelligence. Sorry David. It sounds like you just couldn’t afford enough lockers. Had you had the funds to purchase more lockers the show would have been forced to salt them. But by only purchasing a few lockers they didn’t need to be salted because those who could afford more were chosen over you (thus becoming the ‘heros’ of the show) – at least according to what you’re claiming.
You mean they don’t find thousands of dollars worth of antiques and collectibles in dusty old storage lockers? Really?!?! Next thing you’ll be telling me is that the Bachelor doesn’t find true love, or that WWE wrestling is staged.
I don’t CARE if it’s staged – I watch it for the personalities. Same as any other reality show.