
This morning’s just-announced DGA Award nominations are good news for the major studios and bad news for
Harvey Weinstein. With Ben Affleck for Warner Bros’ Argo, Kathryn Bigelow for Sony’s Zero Dark Thirty, Tom Hooper for Universal’s Les Miserables, Ang Lee for 20th Century Fox’s Life Of Pi and Steven Spielberg for Disney/Dreamworks Lincoln, it was a clean sweep for the majors — a continuing roaring comeback in Oscar contenders for the big boys who the past two years have watched The Weinstein Company take Best Picture (and top DGA) honors with small indies like The Artist and The King’s Speech. Clearly, even as their focus is on money-making blockbusters and popcorn entertainment, the majors are no longer sitting on the sidelines when it comes to the Oscars and seem fully invested in the process this year at least.
Related: DGA Award Nominations Announced
It’s highly unusual since the advent of the Miramax takeover of Oscar seasons the past quarter century to see no independent contender in a strong position. But, at least as far as the DGA is concerned, that’s the story here, along with the fact that four of the five nominees are past DGA- and Oscar-directing winners, with Affleck the only newcomer to the DGA club after directing only his third feature film (he is an Oscar winner for co-writing Good Will Hunting). Bigelow and Hooper both won in the last three years and have made a quick return to the golden circle. Spielberg, meanwhile, is the Big Kahuna of the DGA as he is a three-time winner (The Color Purple, Schindler’s List, Saving Private Ryan) and now 11-time nominee as well as winner of the guild’s Life Achievement Award. Lee’s enormously impressive technical feat in bringing what was thought to be an unfilmable book, Life Of Pi, so successfully to the big screen is clearly something that appealed to the sensibility of directors, so his nomination was definitely expected. This will make for one of the tightest and most interesting directing races in years at the DGA.
Although it probably won’t make any of those omitted from today’s list feel any better about their chances of
gaining an Oscar nomination, Spielberg actually won the DGA Award for Color Purple but was completely snubbed when it came time for even an Oscar nomination for that film. The two films that might have made the DGA list — David O. Russell’s Silver Linings Playbook and Quentin Tarantino’s Django Unchained, both from Weinstein (Sony also has a stake in Django since they are releasing internationally) — remain strong possibilities to take at least one of the slots in the much-smaller directors branch choices at Oscar nominations on Thursday, along with a possible wildcard choice of Michael Haneke for the Foreign Language entry Amour. But the DGA, more than any other guild, has the strongest correlation with Oscar nominees and winners so expect at least four of these five contenders to be on Oscar’s list too. Only six times since their inception in 1949 have DGA and Oscar not agreed in the final vote, so today’s list definitely puts these five films in the strongest position not only for an Oscar win for Directing but also for Picture as the winner of Director, in most cases, is also the Best Picture champ — with Crash being the most recent exception in 2004.
The good news for Weinstein is because of the earlier timetable the Oscar votes are already in and the DGA announcement (which usually comes as Oscar voting is still in progress) will not have any direct bearing or influence. Also it should be noted that this was the first year the DGA allowed DVD screeners to be sent to their membership and although it was sent to Academy members, Django Unchained was held back from a DGA mailing , the only major contender to do so. That might have hurt Tarantino’s chances here but the late Christmas Day release of the film made it difficult for the distributor to get those to the membership and I also understand there were piracy concerns on the film which has become a major boxoffice smash. The film did receive a PGA nod also without the benefit of screeners being sent to that Guild.
With the intense competition between so many genuine contenders it was inevitable that today’s all-important DGA nominations were bound to disappoint at least two of them and the same thing will happen with Oscar nominations. It seems a shame that with the new system where there can be ten nominees for Best Picture , there can still only be five for Best Director. It means that potentially five of those movies deemed good enough to be a best picture apparently directed themselves.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


The Oscar is based on best films, rarely politics…
Harvey Weinstein’s The English Patient, Shakespeare In Love, King’s Speech, The Artist were all unique and good. Well if people are all that jealous and hate Harvey that much, then I will just love him more than.
Voters keep in mind to keep the high integrity of excellence in film making, and may the best win, such as the fastest runner take first place in a marathon.
The Master is quite good for best film this year and Navy Seal Team 6 as best documentary. 777
The English Patient was a terrible movie; Fargo should have won that year. Shakespeare in Love wasn’t bad, but Saving Private Ryan was the best and most memorable movie from 1998. The King’s Speech was very good, so I won’t dispute its award that year (although my personal preference was True Grit). The Artist was a gimmick film while Hugo was, by far, the best film from that year. You statement that the Oscar is based on the best films and rarely politics just doesn’t ring true…
The English Patient, Shakespeare In Love, King’s Speech, The Artist
No; these are films that are justly forgotten. I’m looking at the list of Weinstein prestige pictures and there’s a common thread, a sort of listlessness. Once a great film is experienced, you cannot imagine a world in which it doesn’t exist. Not so with this mediocre lot.
Good films, not politics! I don’t think so.
I think Tarantino missed out on a nomination because the studio didn’t send DGA members a Django screener. You can get nominated without a screener, of course, but Django was a movie a lot of people didn’t necessarily want to see in the theater because of some of its controversial elements.
did you get a Life of Pi screener? (if DGA…)
@buckzollo,
Yes, DGA got a screener of everything that was nominated.
We also got The Master, Silver LP, Moonrise K, Perks of Being a Wallflower, This is 40, Promised Land, Flight and a couple of others I can’t think of right now.
I agree. I might have voted his way had I seen it before voting ended. As it is I just managed to see it yesterday. A screener would have helped.
Then the people who were too PC to go to a theater lost out. It was a very good film. Spike Lee is just jealous he didn’t think of it first.
Weinstein didn’t send screeners to DGA (and PGA) members. A foolish marketing blunder that left members the option of braving the theaters during the holiday CRUSH as well as paying full fare for the chance to see a movie to vote on OR go out of the way during the week to see a screening around town (rarely convenient) or at a special screening.
My hunch is WeinCo was thinking they’d save some $$$ that members would see anyway. Whoops!
It’s not about indie vs. major studio, it’s about the films themselves. Take a look at the actual films nominated and you will see all are worthy contenders. Those mentioned as being “passed by” are clearly and obviously not as strong.
That the Weinstein’s didn’t have any top contenders this year while the majors studios are strong is just how it crumbled this year, cookie-wise. No need to make it into an indie-vs-major kind of battle. It’s not.
Agree. No one on the DGA list is not warranted. And, I believe Inglorious Basterds was a better film than Djano, and I am sure Quentin was not far out of the money this year..
Perhaps, the only omission is Amour. It takes an extraordinary director to basically lock down the camera, avoid any editing not required, and let the actors tell the story. But, as only five receive nominations, and all five are certainly qualified, it is what it is.
I can hear Harvey Weinstein blowing a gasket now.
Really? That must get awful annoying as it probably happens so often!
Hooper for The Miserable movie? Really? An epic musical shot in close up with people who can’t sing. Liked King’s Speech but come on. The direction was not very good. During the revolution scenes I thought I was watching an expensive student film. No sense of scope. Looked silly.
you lost me at “people who can’t sing.” Sure, they weren’t the caliber of the stage musical, but if I wanted to see that again, I’d be tickets to that. Everyone in the movie could sing, and although I agree with most that Russell Crowe was the weakest link, even he was okay.
Crowe was ok? The audience I saw it with started laughing and people left. Please, raise your bar a bit.
Hope, to be fair, Anne Hathaway, Samantha Barks, Eddie Redmayne, and Aaron Tveit, they all can sing. Were you watching the same movie ?
And you sound silly…what movie did you see? Actor’s that can’t sing? Pull your head out of your a$$. Samantha Barks, Aaron Tveit, Hugh Jackman, Eddie Redmayne, Amanda Seyfried, and Anne Hathaway can’t sing?
It looked like a student film? Where did you go to school? If you didn’t like the movie, or didn’t agree with the decisions made by the director just say it.
You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about…and sound like a self-absorbed uneducated amature.
Other than Barks not a single one of them would ever make it past a first audition for a stage musical that wasn’t solely casting names. Fine actors, but, not singers.
Casting D, please, do proper research, before you blast people. Eddie Redmayne, Anne Hathaway ( ” Carnival ” ) , and Broadway’s Aaron Tveit ( ” Next To Normal ” & ” Catch Me If You Can ” ) , have all received good reviews for stage musicals.
Hooper has to be the most mediocre director to ever win the best directing Oscar. “The King’s Speech” was like a slightly higher budget BBC drama. It was 100% script and acting. All he had to do was point the camera and shoot.
And “Les Mis’” direction was outright horrible. It alternates between claustrophobic and schizophrenic.
I actually thought the King’s speech was very good.
And they call themselves the Directors Guild but seem to always come up with vanilla wrap choices. Where’s the DGA unchained?
Don’t think we should go to 10 Director nominees for the Oscar. It really cheapens what the nomination means. Just as going to 10 Best Picture noms lessens what it means to get one. 5 is plenty.
DGA sent everything worth watching and I’ll include Django to appear unbiased. I believe “Life of Pi” will win Best Picture. Or Argo.
If I had to bet money I’d say “Argo” and Affleck are locks for best picture and best director. I don’t think they are the most deserving choices, but they seem the safest bets to win.
I wouldn’t have nominated Hooper, but he did do one thing directorially that I thought was nearly impossible: he made recitative work on film without growing tiresome. Yes, there were too many close-ups, but it was his confidence in having the actors do it live and filming it as it went along that helped move the film. I also don’t get why people are bothered by so many close-ups: it’s a musical, for Crissakes, do you want everybody singing in long shot?
Rant aside, it’s a good group of nominees. When the people getting snubbed are Joe Wright, David O. Russell, P.T. Anderson and Quentin Tarantino, who all made great movies (or in some cases, their best so far), you know it’s been a strong year.
But good news for audiences. It’s great that the majors want to put a small portion of their resources into making quality pics. The truth is top actors, writers and directors want to win Oscars and all the other awards and top studio execs want to work with these folks.
Hope, I agree with you. And it’s so hard to admit that because I LOVE Les Mis. But I disagree with your “people who can’t sing” statement. Russell Crowe was awful, yes, but the rest (Hugh, Ann, Amanda, little Gavroche, and Samantha Barks — Eponine) are all singers. And they were good. The movie overall was just not great.
As a DGA member, I am very disappointed David O. Russell did not get a nomination. Particularly over Hooper. With “The Fighter” and now “Silver Linings Playbook”, I think he is one of the most gifted directors in Hollywood today. It was a tough year. Sam Mendes did nomination worthy work in “SKyfall” (he also was a pick of mine) and Bayona did amazing things in “The Impossible”. All worthy. I simply am not on the “Les Miz’ bandwagon.
Me too, very much so on David O. Russell. WTF??
Oh my,the dark legend of Crowe’s singing skills is out ther again. Actually Crowe sings just fine in Les Miserables and I doubt that any audience members laughed or walked out because of his singing.
It sucks that David O Russell for Silver Linings Playbook did not get a nomination here, such a great great movie.
In my theatre in NYC there was laughter by the second time crowe sang. It was painful and embarressing. Why not get someone who can sing? i like crowe. He should just stick to the shower.
“Les Mis” is the only movie I’ve ever attended where the audience actually cheered/applauded as the credits rolled – except for “Master of the House,” I loved it, too!! And, it upset me that some of my favorite songs from the play were shortened – you could just imagine the director worrying about trying to sell a 3-hour movie – I’m waiting for “The Director’s Cut”!
There’ll be no three-peat for Harvey this year. Done. Finished. Decided. Only once since the DGA award was established has the director of Oscar’s best film not secured at least a nomination from that group: 1989 with Driving Miss Daisy. As it happens, that was also the one instance since the early 1930s in which the director of the year’s best film didn’t get a nomination from AMPAS either. Not even Harvey can overcome that sort of precedent. It’ll be Lincoln versus ZDT for the win and the DGA will decide it.
Lincoln should win the put you to sleep award. Its title is totally deceptive, it had little to do with Lincoln and was mostly about the fourteenth amendment. It was as bad as they come.
“Lincoln” is a great motion picture and Daniel Day-Lewis did a great job playing the President… Sally Fields and Tommy Lee Jones also did their part as supporting actors. What a way to play out history… Your friends at Spiderwood.
Re: Django Unchained
Really a fun film if not a bit long. The problem is fear. That’s what Hollywood lives on. Was the movie PC? Hell no. Was the N word hurled about? Sure, but it was about slavery. What would you have slave traders call black people? Sir or Ma’am?
Stop being so afraid and PC and get with the rest of the country. The only reason that little troll Spike Lee didn’t like the movie is he didn’t think of it first.
“high integrity of excellence” No such thing in Hollywood. They are a bunch of phony hypocrites. If they really believed in wealth redistribution they would get rid of all their money and give it to the poor or everyone on a film would make the same amount. They are nothing but politics. They are so predictable. A silly bunch of conformists.
I am just a typical seldom movie goer. The prices have reached a point that I cannot not longer justify seeing 1 good movie for every 4 lame, bad or just tossed together movies. The Pat On The Back awards. Just don’t connect with the viewers like they use to.
It is like there are too many Social Agendas being pushed now a days by Hollywood.
As far as the Hollywood not political, someone out must be living in a Pot smoke filled room, to buy into that line. Every Movie has its share of innuendos, hints, subtle tie ins, to social agendas.
Hollywood needs to learn that by becoming one those, in your face political activists, they alienate 1/2 of their possible fan base at any time.
I am just a typical increasingly seldom movie goer.
The prices have reached a point that I can no longer justify seeing 1 good movie for every 4 hyped up lame, or just tossed together movies. No I am likely, like the many passing up the Big Screen for my Home Big Screen and Red Box with a Blue Ray player.
I feel the growing number of Pat On The Back awards just don’t connect with what the customers view. Plus the actors go overboard to out do each other for the biggest Morning News Bites for stupid comment, stunt, or planned dress accident.
As far as Hollywood being non-political, someone would have to be living in a Pot smoke filled room, to buy into that line. Every Movie has its share of innuendos, hints, subtle tie ins to social agendas.
What a bunch of shit the producers guild sent out this year!!
Could not agree more. Hooper should not be on this list. Les Mis was bad. For those who
Think the singing was good, please listen to the original Broadway or London cast live recordings. There is no comparison.
Sadly, the Hooper version mostly sounds like a Junior college musical. I really don’t care that Hathaway starved herself and cried real tears, her singing performance was not anywhere near as good as the original musical casts. Listen for your self, you can purchase both versions from Itunes, Amazon or a local music store, warning you wont be happy though listning to the sub par movie soundtrack after you hear how Les Mis should really be sung.