Diane Haithman is contributing to Deadline’s TCA coverage.
At today’s panel on Starz’ new series Da Vinci’s Demons, David S. Goyer, the show’s creator, writer and executive producer, said that his first historical period project would be about 85% historically accurate. “He had a pretty incredible life, we didn’t have to embellish as much as you’d think,” Goyer said of Da Vinci, portrayed by
Tom Reilly. Goyer pointed out that though Da Vinci is best known as an artist and scientist, he was also thought to be a great horseman. Turning Da Vinci into a TV superhero was not too difficult: “He’s kind of superhero-y anyway.” You can watch a trailer for the show below.
Goyer described the tone of the show as historical but “viewed through a modern prism” and likened it to a graphic novel that strives to be fun rather than a history book. He also said that there are surprising parallels between Da Vinci and Batman: “They both had big father issues, and formative horrific incidents when they were trapped in caves,” he said. He also noted that Batman’s creator designed Batman’s cape based on Da Vinci’s glider designs.
Goyer added that one of the conceits of the show is that thousands of pages are missing from Da Vinci’s writings and drawings. The show will speculate on what might have been included in those pages.


Part of the “conceit” will also make Da Vinci straight? I realize there is no definite proof, but there is enough historical evidence to suggest that he could’ve been gay. I also realize Starz -despite it not being a broadcast network or cable show- is out to get as many eyes on the show as possible and is unwilling to risk having its lead superhero gay, but it seems disingenuous after years of Spartacus having gay characters (albeit, secondary ones) that they would not just risk it to begin with.
So, Starz has ‘straight-washed’ Leonardo DaVinci? Why? This is pathetic. Leonardo was gay.
I’m sure in the Starz version of the South, Harriet Tubman will be blonde, blue-eyed, and milky white.
Blech!
You do understand the difference between these two and how they aren’t remotely the same things, don’t you?
As it’s been said several times, there is no proof anywhere that says if he were gay or not. Having him not be gay doesn’t change hisstory at all or anything we know about him. Having him not be gay doesn’t alter this story or change his accomplishments.
Harriet Tubman was a black woman. She was definitively a black woman. Her entire story is based around her being a slave. Her being a white woman would completely alter her story and how she accomplished the things she’s famous for.
Making her white would be blatantly altering facts, whereas not making him gay would not be altering facts (as we know them).
i agree, will the gay community and their pro gay supporters please stop confusing race with sexual preference. if you want to make friends in the black community you have to stop relating gender preference with a persons race.
who cares if he was gay or not, it has nothing to do with his inventions.
Making him British falls within the 15% historically INaccurate area.
Actually they addressed this at NY comic con. They will explore his sexuality in the series.
This looks GOOD! British and not gay, I’ll forgive.
I don’t agree with the original comment that related making him appear straight to making Harriet Tubman white. I am a little put off by your comment though. First, it’s not called gender preference, it is someone’s sexual orientation. Referring to it as a preference makes it sound like a choice, like I prefer red wine over white. And second, while race is a visible difference between people, and sexual orientation is mental, I don’t understand why comparing the two is offensive to you. Both groups have been deprived of basic human rights at one time or another, and both have had to endure harassment, assault and even death simply for being who they are. The situations aren’t identical, but there are similarities. Leonardo Da Vinci was charged with sodomy several times. If he hadn’t been so powerful at the time, he would have been executed. So, when we see a trailer where he’s having sex with a woman, it’s a little disappointing, because his likely homosexuality is part of his story.