
Dish is using the recent controversy over the Best In Show award the satcaster’s new Hopper with Sling DVR did not receive as a recruiting tool. The ad-zapping service was awarded the top prize by the editors of CNET before they were overruled by corporate parent CBS who is suing Dish over Hopper. Today Dish bought full-page ads in several major newspapers to crow about the award it didn’t get and blast CBS. In the ad, which first appeared on Dish’s Web site, the company says “CBS will go to any lengths to keep you from enjoying ad-skipping technology – even censoring its own writers and throwing out their decision to name Hopper ‘Best In Show.’”
The controversy shifted the Hopper debate about whether it is ethical for a distributor whose service depends on programming to cut the lifeline that makes a lot of that programming possible, commercials, to one about journalistic integrity. CNET media writer Greg Sandoval resigned as a result of CBS’ decision to bar Dish from getting the award. In statement issued earlier this week, the network said it “has been consistent on this situation from the beginning” and called the debacle ”an isolated and unique incident” involving “a product that has been challenged as illegal” by CBS “and nearly every other major media company as well.”
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Remember when CBS was called the Tiffany Network and their journalistic integrity was never questioned – then came the Mike Wallace and Dan Rather debacles and now this CNET award disaster.
Ah yes, remember when.
CNET has the right to anoint whomever they choose without interference from other businesses under the Viacom umbrella, but in the real world it can be hard to pull off as demonstrated in this instance.
However that “issue” is a red herring compared to interference and corruption of the copyright laws by DISH, which is altering the content of CBS, and other suppliers of programming, by providing the end user with a device to eliminate commercials (copyrighted material) from the program (also copyrighted material). If the consumer (DISH’s subscriber) wants to mute the sound, look away from the set, change channels or such, that is their right. DISH has no such right(s).
In print, I turn the page when a ad appears that has no interest to me. On the Web we just click it “off”, if we can, otherwise we endure it in order to get to what we want to see. All of that because SOMEONE HAS TO PAY FOR THIS CONTENT. We are an ad supported entertainment world, by and large. No so the UK and others that require a household license to watch television. In the USA we let the market decide,and like it or not, advertising foots the bill most of the time. If it doesn’t, consumers have to pay (HBO, Showtime, movies in theaters, as examples). There never has been a free lunch, and probably won’t be either, barring an abandonment of democracy, and that is what this Hopper thing is all about at it’s core. CNET is a sideshow, since everyone currently collecting a paycheck from CNET would be out of work were it not for advertising, Hopper or no Hopper.
And THAT’S what’s wrong with capitalism.
I see this issue going all the way to the US Supreme Court, and it will be on a clash of Constitutional Rights. Hell or High Water, the results won’t be pretty. What you have here is Freedom of Advertising VS Freedom FROM Advertising.
You just took the unbiased integrity out of your organization. Your no longer trust worthy
Award, asmard!
Let me get this straight: in order to get “free” over-the-air programming, I have to buy it from DISH. Then I can have an option of whether or not to watch commercials.
Aren’t those commercials what make it free?
This is exactly why I have no sympathy for the networks. I have to pay every month for what are supposed to be “free” over the air networks. I am paying the local networks every month (in my Dish bill)for every local channel that they are supposed to be delivering for “free”. Most local broadcasters have turned down their power levels at the transmitter to save money (reducing coverage) while at the same time extorting the distributors (Dish, Directv & cable) and taking channels down everytime their contract comes up for renewal.
Broadcasters have a monoply in their DMA. With congress & fcc approval they have eliminated any chance of a competing network in their market. I would love to order (and pay for) additonal local channels from other areas (Chicago, New York, Denver) but i can’t. Legally Dish can NOT provide them to me.
It would be a great day if we could fix this but until then the broadcast networks can go pound sand. I will continue to use my autohop option since I am forced to PAY them for their content anyway.
I just wish people would get their facts straight. For those of us who actually HAVE a Hopper from DISH – the AutoHop feature does NOT alter the programming in any way! For recorded network content, the day after it airs, you can choose an option that triggers one big jump over the commercial break rather than having to hit the FFWD Skip button a bunch of times. If at any time you rewind or move forward in the recorded content – the commercials ARE STILL THERE. If you are fast-fowarding or skipping through commercials in your DVR content… you are essentially using AutoHop. There is no difference.