Rupert Murdoch was in London last week, crowing about scoring rights to online clips of Premier League soccer matches and reportedly visiting his UK newspapers. He also held a private dinner that’s becoming a hot potato in the local media. London Mayor Boris Johnson, a rival to Prime Minister David Cameron for leadership of the Conservative Party, is widely believed to have attended along with Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, whose office confirmed his presence to The Guardian. (Also reportedly there was Homeland star Damian Lewis, whose show is produced by News Corp.-owned Fox21, and who’s a graduate of Eton, as is Johnson.) While private meetings between politicians and media owners don’t run afoul of parliamentary or party rules, this particular dinner has raised eyebrows in light of last year’s Leveson Inquiry into UK media ethics where an overriding theme was the cozy relationship enjoyed by newspaper proprietors and the highest levels of government.
The Guardian suggests that last week’s dinner in Mayfair “demonstrates” that Murdoch’s “political pulling power has not been diminished by criticism in the Leveson report.” Hugh Grant, who settled a complaint over alleged phone-hacking with Murdoch’s News International last month, tweeted on Monday: “BoJo and RuMu cosy up yet again. Murdochracy in action.” Yet others, including the press regulation advocacy group Hacked Off, of which Grant is a member, reserved their harshest criticism for the mayor. “After the revelations unearthed during Leveson, you might think that senior politicians had learnt their lesson about holding secret assignations with newspaper bosses. Yet it appears that Boris Johnson just doesn’t get it. It beggars belief that anyone could describe a dinner between the most powerful politician in London and the head of News Corporation, the company at the centre of the phone-hacking scandal, as a ‘private arrangement’,” Hacked Off wrote in a blog post. Johnson is also head of the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime which has strategic oversight of the Metropolitan Police, which in turn has been investigating alleged wrongdoing at Murdoch’s UK press holdings, and Hacked Off called it “totally inappropriate for him to be meeting Mr Murdoch in private” during the ongoing probes.
During his Leveson testimony, Murdoch maintained that it was normal for politicians to speak with editors and press proprietors to share views, and he consistently denied letting his outside business concerns be a factor in who his papers chose to support. On January 26, four days after the dinner is said to have taken place, Murdoch tweeted: “UK politics fascinating. Cameron flat footed Milliband with Euro referendum promise, but still faces scepticism in own party.”


Yes, this is terrible because we’ve never heard of something called Freedom of Association.
Pretty poor cover-up by Murdoch, meeting socially at a public dinner party covered by the hostile press.
No one says they are not free to have dinner together, just that it stinks. And it was not a ‘public dinner party’.
Makes you wonder what “RuMu” would have to do to actually fall out of favor with his Conservative Party chums. At the end of the day all he got was a slap on the wrist and several million in settlements to pay. Why he wasn’t permanently banned from owning a newspaper or tv channel again in the EU is baffling but probably has aclot to do with dinners like the one described above. And as gross as it is, the Dems do this kind of power brokering too–a few articles down is Harvey Weinstein bragging about how tight he is with our President.
Boris Johnson is an absolute pig. Murdochracy it is. Hope transparency works this time.
And what part of this does anyone find surprising? Politicians come and go, but Rupert Murdoch is always present one way or another.
The only lasting impact of the scandals is that Rupert’s legacy has been cemented as global scumbag…although a successful and very powerful scumbag…a global scumbag none the less.
As I said… Rupert Murdoch, despite all the scandals that would’ve surely sent others to prison, always seems to remain untouchable. He has very powerful “friends”, and he owes them.
No -there’s nothing unusual in Murdoch dining with powerful politicians, politics and the media are the same as they’ve always been… deception and distraction!
FTCS… you said it!!!
Should we really be feigning shock and outrage at this? If Labour were in power, he’d be having dinner with them.
Not so much a case of GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER, as in having a host like Rupert Murdoch, it becomes something like Arthur Jensen in NETWORK inviting all the crooked politicians from ALL THE KING’S MEN and ALL THE PRESIDENT’S MEN, to an even more unholy meal than in BABETTE’S FEAST!
Stop moaning like litte school kids!!!! everyone is entitled to have dinner with whomever he wants; go get a life.
And if you dont like Boris; bang your head against the wall or vote for someone else; gosh!!!!!!
So sick of hearing nohting but complaints when it comes to Murdoch; why you all losers have achieved close to zero; he succeeded! TRY TO DO THE SAME OR SHUT UP!