U.S. District Judge Arenda Wright Allen in Virginia sentenced Jeramiah Perkins, the head of the IMAGINE Group, to 60 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and an order to pay $15,000 in restitution. And Hollywood’s chief lobby group says that’s justice delivered. IMAGINE “was responsible for more than 40% of all English-language theatrical movie theft,” says MPAA spokesperson Kate Bedingfield. “This group was the most prolific English-language movie theft group in history, and shutting it down was a huge step forward in helping to reassure consumers that the movies and TV shows they watch online are legitimate and secure, not stolen. This was a significant victory in the effort to protect the hard work of creators online, and in the effort to protect an internet that works for everyone.”
The Justice Department indicted Perkins and three other defendants last April. He pleaded guilty in August to one count of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. The nation’s chief law enforcement agency says that from late 2009 to 2011 Perkins led efforts to illegally obtain video files of theatrical movies, and then secretly record and synchronize audio tracks. IMAGINE distributed the pirated films on the Internet, collecting payments and donations from people who downloaded them. Perkins’ co-defendants — Sean Lovelady, Willie Lambert and Gregory Cherwonik — also pleaded guilty last year to one count of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement and were sentenced to shorter prison terms. Another co-defendant, Javier Ferrer, pleaded guilty to a similar charge and is due to be sentenced in March.


I love the typical hacker sentiment, “It’s not stealing, it’s sharing.” Sure thing. I’m heading to your place to share your car, your apartment and your red bull. Hope this kick starts a string of arrests
That’s a false analogy.
When people share books, movies, or music online, they are essentially making it possible for other people to make copies. That is not the same as sharing a car, an apartment, or an energy drink. If you borrow my car, I can’t use it while you are using it.
Content-sharing doesn’t work that way. When people share through, say, BitTorrent, they are simply making content they have available for copying. It’s somewhat analogous to a library putting a copy machine in the library. They give you the means to copy a portion of a book.
The MPAA wants us all to see file-sharing as theft. It is not. If I have a great album on CD and I rip it for a friend, how does that hurt the artist or the label? It’s not a lost sale, it’s a *potential* sale! If my friend likes the album I ripped, he might well become a fan, purchase tickets to concerts, buy his own CDs, etc.
I am all for artists, screenwriters, actors etc. being compensated for the work they do. But the MPAA is not interested in that. They claim to be, but what they really want is an Orwellian world where they – and not we – control how we enjoy music, movies, and other creative works. They want laws that give them the power to prevent time-shifting or space-shifting as they see fit. I will resist such draconian laws with every last breath I have. We need digital freedom. It’s vital to a modern free society.
So bizarre that a childhood friend got wrapped up in this. I was wondering what happened to him for years, did a Google search on him and this came up.