
EXCLUSIVE: What a difference $2 billion in late fall box office business has done for MGM‘s ambitions. The studio is planning to unleash a new version of Ben-Hur, based on the 1880 Lew Wallace novel Ben-Hur: A Tale Of The Christ, which outsold every book but The Bible until it was eclipsed by Gone With The Wind.
MGM, which emerged from bankruptcy and is raising new funding after Skyfall crossed $1 billion worldwide gross and The Hobbit heads to the $900 million mark, is buying a Ben-Hur spec by Keith Clarke (he scripted the Peter Weir-directed The Way Back), and the package comes with Sean Daniel and Joni Levin attached to produce, and Clarke and Jason Brown exec producing.
MGM actually released the 1959 Charlton Heston-starrer Ben-Hur, as well as the 1925 silent film Ben-Hur: A Tale Of The Christ. The studio isn’t looting its library titles: MGM, which has seen many of its assets pillaged during previous ownership regimes, sold the Heston film to Ted Turner in the 1980s. But the book is public domain. MGM, now steered by Gary Barber and production president Jonathan Glickman and taking on action adventure films that include Hercules with Dwayne Johnson, just loved a spec that is faithful to the book and is much different than the 1959 William Wyler film that focused on the adult blood feud between Judah Ben-Hur (Heston) and Messala (Stephen Boyd).
This film will tell the formative story of the characters as they grew up best friends before the Roman Empire took control of Jerusalem. Judah Ben-Hur was a Jewish prince and Messala the son of a Roman tax collector. After the latter leaves to be educated in Rome for five years, the young man returns with a different attitude. Messala mocks Judah and his religion and when a procession passes by Judah’s house and a roof tile accidentally falls and hits the governor, Messala betrays his childhood friend and manipulates it so that Judah is sold into slavery and certain death on a Roman warship, with his mother and sister thrown in prison for life.
Judah doesn’t die, and vows revenge on Messala which, like in the films, culminates in the famed chariot races. There is another way the script differs from the movie, in that it will tell the parallel tale of Jesus Christ, with whom Ben-Hur has several encounters which moves him to become a believer in the Messiah, and which culminates in Christ being sentenced to death by Pontius Pilate. Intertwined in all this is the lifelong struggle between Ben-Hur and Messala.
The depiction of Jesus Christ as an occasional character in the script puts this project squarely in the mix of Biblical-themed films that are proliferating at studios around town. They include Pontius Pilate, which now has Brad Pitt attached to the Vera Blasi-scripted Warner Bros project; two films about Moses that Steven Spielberg and Ridley Scott are separately circling; and the Darren Aronofsky-directed Noah, which stars Russell Crowe.
“It’s one of the great stories of friendship and betrayal, and faith, that works in the context of a big onscreen action thriller for a global audience,” Daniel said of the Wallace novel.


Blasphemy!
It’s a fucking no-brainer. Pitched to a writer several months back, had mild interest. I got busy, he got busy, and then you see this . . .
Just goes to show, never hem and haw, shit moves fast and then you look like a fucking idiot.
Course, could have spent 6-10 months developing a BEN HUR spec and have it not sell. So, both sides of the coin.
Won’t be the same without Ben’s line, “Take your stinkin’ paws off me, you damn dirty ape.”
I’d rather see Adam Sandler in “Ben-Him/Ben-Hur”.
I can see the marketing machine at work now:
Hugh Jackman (or Bradley Cooper) as Judah Ben-Hur
John Goodman as Quintus Arrius
Keira Knightley as Esther
Leonardo Dicaprio as Messala
Robert Downey Jr. as the Sheik
Mandy Patinkin as Simonides
Katherine Heigl as Miriam
Christoph Waltz as Pontius Pilate
Actually, upon reviewing the article, I realize that this will be the CW version. (“This film will tell the formative story of the characters as they grew up best friends before the Roman Empire took control of Jerusalem.”)
Hence, I change my cast lineup as follows:
Daniel Radcliffe as Judah Ben-Hur
David Boreanaz as Quintus Arrius
Dakota Fanning as Esther
Josh Hutcherson as Messala
Leonardo Dicaprio as the Sheik
Mandy Patinkin as Simonides
Jennifer Lawrence as Miriam
Robert Pattinson as Pontius Pilate
I’ve read the script. It’s essentially a remake of the Heston film. There’s some stuff in the first act with them in their younger days, but that’s it.
I read it too and it’s actually different.. it’s the same basic story sure (wouldn’t you want that? The story is a classic) but the script is 110 pages and reads like a thriller. Compare that to 3.5 hrs with Heston how is it even possible to think it’s the same?
The actor to be Ben-Hur, would have to least 6’2″ in height,
have square shoulders, be physically fit. He has to have a
powerful commanding presence, strong willed, tough, very sure
of himself, a good looking ladies man, an aristocratic, and
also can be very kindhearted, thoughtful and considerate. In
short – High Class, whereas all men would respect & envy him!
Number 1 choice is JIM CAVIEZEL, birth date Sept. 26, 1968
He still looks young & good make up can make him look younger.
Number 2 Eric Bana Number 3 Hugh Jackman
Messala could be Eric Bana or Hugh Jackman
BEN-HUR’s mother, sister should have the image of being
WHOLESOME, aristocratic, educated, high class, and dignified
with beauty. NOT some reformed hussy or some common wench from
the wrong side of the tracks or town!
Giada de Laurentiis should be BEN-HUR sister! Perfect choice!
Esther should be the image of being WHOLESOME, educated and
dignified with beauty not some reformed hussy or some common
wench from the wrong side of town!
Also the Set should be a spectacular! The historians and the
archaeologists should love its being authentic. They love
1959 BEN-HUR!
The music should fit and represent the POWER of the Rome
Empire, NOT some new age music or some modern crap. With
Christ, the music should be heavenly glorified, representing
the love and mercy of God. The MUSIC should be dynamic,
classical and unforgettable!
NO TATTOOS on anybody whatsoever! ALL THE CRIMINALS AND LOW
LIFE HAVE TATTOOS! TATTOOS ARE NASTY, UGLY and DEGRADING!
Only uncivilized and poor up bringing people have tattoos!
I’ve seen pretty girls been over and a tatoo pops up above
her pants on her back and it looks like some monster
crawling out of her ass!
If you disagree with this, you are wasting MONEY, time,
and film! In short, you just don’t get it!
The above mention is just getting started. The 1959 BEN-HUR
is and will be the BEST MOVIE ever made! including, future
remakes! Most of all a new BEN-HUR has to be believeable! In
short, IT HAS TO FOR REAL! ONLY THEN IT HAS A CHANCE FOR
SUCCESS! If it isn’t real, then it will FAIL!
1959 BEN-HUR raised the movie to a new high standard of
being CLASSIC for all time!
If you disagree with my opinion above and make BEN-HUR
contrary to my opinion, then you will lose money and be
another LOSER.
Sincerely,
N. W. Spencer
P.S.
The only chance of success is to have Steven Spielberg
to be the director of BEN-HUR
Starring Mark Wahlberg, of course.
I hope that’s a joke. I’d rather stick pins in my eyes.
Did Jan. 14th become the new April 1st and i didn’t get the memo?
What about Al Ruddy’s version? That’s a good script!
-RnsW
I’m confused. Everything you say is different in the reboot was in the Wyler version, including the cameos from Christ!
I was just going to say that.
Leave the classics alone.
What could go wrong?
I know this seems a bit ridiculous, but I’m actually quite stoked for this. Everyone’s probably groaning over the idea of another giant, bloated, unnecessary remake or adaptation, but I think this could actually be spectacular. I mean, who’s dumb enough to argue against this idea? GO MGM!!!
Great idea! Given that the 1959 version was a remake, and that didn’t turn out so bad, I’m excited to see how this one does!
With all the great historical stories out there, they have to remake this classic??
come on people – this is just not right.
MGM was able to remake Fame seemly just by still owning the TV show.
The 1959 film could be re-released theatrically and it would do really well especially around Easter time it’s a great film and audiences have always loved it. This remake could be a really big hit but only if they cast it perfectly. Heston and Boyd were sensational and I don’t know who you can cast to be as good of a Ben-Hur as Heston was. Hugh Jackman is probably the best idea to star in this.
Totally agree with you. Ben-Hur is right up there on the list of films meant to be seen and enjoyed on the big screen. It’s a shame that it hasn’t really received any re-releases, because like you, I think it would do relatively well.
Well thank God! Just the other day I was thinking “When oh when will there be a reboot of Ben-Hur”? My prayers have been answered. A-M-E-N!!!!!
Stop hating on this – save your vitriol for the odyssey in space
What’s next BIRTH OF A NATION?
Is there not enough history to make a film about? A quality biblical film is very hard to make and if it was done right in the 50′s its because there was greater respect for Judea/Christian values. Today’s liberal prospective would have the Romans viewed as conservatives as it should be the opposite. Liberals believe in statism which is clearly what Rome was. Oppression and dictatorship is what the left embrace. Tyranny and the absence of God is progressive think. The state knows all, so do not question it’s authority. To remake Ben-Hur is just a bad idea.
I hope they mo-cap Chuck Heston in the lead and make it 3D with a 48 frame rate.
HFR??? Why? Do you want it to look like a TV soap opera?
Christ in 3D?? Yeah, so he’ll look like those stupid lenticular pictures of “him” where he opens and closes his eyes. Very classy.
A remake is a bad idea. One of the reasons the original was so great is because most of the special effects (except for some of the sea effects) and especially the chariot race were all practical effects – they were done for real. Any new version is going to be all CGI and really going to suck. And what actor of today has the presence of Charles Heston?
Some of the casting that people posted as jokes is liable to be the actual casting.
And the author of this article either doesn’t know how to express themselves or never saw the movie because as others have pointed out, much of what the author claimed was different about the new film or the original novel is actually in the old film.
Oh, good grief. Here we go again, MGM. Gonna swirl the bowl one more time.
Are they out of their fucking minds???
If this is for real EON better shop a deal for the future home of the Bond franchise ’cause this’ll kill MGM forever!!
in the golden era studios always did remakes of their own films.they had actors with the chops to do it every 5 to ten years. however, except for russell crowe who is too old now for ben-hur, today’s actors do not have the gravitas on film to pull off this movie.brad pitt as pontius pilate? what a joke. he’s almost fifty and still looks like a boy.there was a reason that actors like chuck heston continually made historic epics. they looked born of a different age.
Next: “Singin’ in the Rain”