
Here is an unexpected vote of support for Best Picture nominee Zero Dark Thirty, a film that probably lost an Oscar nomination for director Kathryn Bigelow because of the cage rattling by three U.S. Senators over what they said was a false impression that the torture depicted in the film led somehow to 9/11 mastermind Osama Bin Laden. Here is a release issued by 9/11 Parents & Families of Firefighters and WTC Victims, which was forwarded to me by Sony Pictures. As a New Yorker, I can see their point. While I was having my house built in a new community a dozen years ago, we met a firefighter who right up the block was building his dream house. Construction got delayed and by the time these houses were done, he had perished on 9/11. His family has long since moved away, but each time I drive past that house, I think of him. I also thought of him while I watched Zero Dark Thirty, and while I found the depiction of torture to be upsetting–it seemed to me that Bigelow and Mark Boal presented it in a way that leaves it up to the viewer to decide whether or not it was worthwhile or reprehensible–but the most surprising thing about the way that movie has played is how the heroism of the CIA operatives and the Navy SEALs has gotten little to no recognition because of the Senate scrutiny. The perspective below comes from a group that every day wakes up reminded they lost loved ones and that everything depicted in Zero Dark Thirty came as the result of an unforgivable terrorist attack on innocent people perpetrated in our backyard.
9/11 Parents & Families of Firefighters and WTC Victims
Statement of Support re “Zero Dark Thirty” FilmJanuary 31, 2013
Contact:
Chief Jim Riches – 917-692-1199
Sally Regenhard – 646-266-1987
Rosemary Cain – 516-798-01099/11 Family Group Says: “NO” to censorship of Zero Dark Thirty film re Bin Laden
As a group of 9/11 families sharing a rare moment of justice and elation in the viewing of a film chronicling the search for and ultimate death of Osama Bin Laden, we find it deeply disturbing that some of our elected officials want to discourage other 9/11 families and the public from seeing this outstanding film. Politicians who have criticized the movie and made misleading claims about it, stand in the way of engaging a public dialogue for a stirring film which invokes feelings of patriotism and perseverance and honors our military, our country, and the victims of 9/11.
We are greatly concerned that a few pundits, “film critics” and elected officials are badmouthing this movie because of the water boarding scenes and because this film directly confronts the enduring terrorist threat.
We feel this is history – like it or not -and no effort should be made to rewrite or censor it for political correctness. Certainly there should be no organized boycott or suppression of films based on political differences. The word for that is “censorship.” How bizarre that members of an industry that suffered so much during the McCarthy era would even consider doing this to their own members!
The use of the term “torture” by elected officials in hopes of dissuading people to endorse or view this film is antithetical to what our government should be all about.
As 9/11 family members whose loved ones were massacred at Ground Zero on September 11, 2001, we applaud Mark Boal and Katherine Bigelow for presenting a film that honors history, our military, our country, and the victims of 9/11 – through the excellent portrayal of how the US government and Navy Seals worked to apprehend OBL. There is still a constitutional right to freedom of speech in our country, and censoring a film is totally un American and against the tenets of our founding fathers. This film inspires dialogue and no elected official can censor any film. We do not want to allow Senators Feinstein, Levin, and McCain or actors David Clennon and9/11 Truthers Ed Asner and Martin Sheen – to inhibit our fellow Americans from seeing ” Zero Dark Thirty.” Our loved ones died for these freedoms on 9/11 – and no one should ever try to abridge them. All citizens should see this film and make their own decisions about its value. This is what democracy is about.
Rita & Chief Jim Riches, FDNY(ret.) Chairperson,
9/11 Parents & Families of Firefighters & WTC Victims
Parents of FF Jimmy Riches 9/11, E4Sally & Sgt. Al Regenhard, NYPD(ret.) USMC Vet.
Parents of FF Christian Regenhard 9/11, L131, Sgt.USMCMaureen & Chief Al Santora, FDNY(ret.) & Family
Parents of FF Christopher Santora 9/11, E54Rosemary Cain
Mother of FF George Cain 9/11, L7Eileen Walsh, Mother
Matthew & Mary Walsh, Siblings
of FF Michael Brennan 9/11 E54/L4Michael Burke
Brother of Capt. William Burke 9/11, E21Sgt. Wilton Sekzer, NYPD(ret.) Proud Vietnam Vet.
Father of Jason Sekzer 9/11,Tower 1, 105Flr/WTCChristina Regenhard & Donal Flynn
Sister & Brother-In-Law of FF Christian Regenhard
Carol Maire WattersFF Robert Mahon FDNY(ret.)
Cousins of FF Christian RegenhardGlenn Corbett, Technical Advisor
9/11 Parents & Families of Firefighters & WTC Victims


Zero Dark Thirty is the most propagandistic possible portrayal of the total U.S. effort in the “war on terror.” It simplifies the experiences of thousands of people in the grips of terror, fear, both victims and assailants, attempting futilely to reconcile the invasion of sovereign nations with the double-edged coups of surprise attacks that BOTH entities employed. It is no more a history of the event that the pamphlets handed out near Ground Zero claiming the plot was a conspiracy by third-parties.
So now Zero Dark Thirty is all about honoring the families of 9/11? We are supposed to watched the film and cheer along in vengeance? So Sony is not going to profit from the movie sales? This is low and shameful. Both from Sony and whoever heads the 9/11 families org that sent out this letter. Really shameful. This does not honor your dead. It’s a hollywood film sent up to make money and win awards. Playing the 911 card just like playing the race card or the gender card always loses.
I was cheering for vengeance watching it. I felt the film did honor the 9/11 victims well.
Well I guess you have something in common with the terrorists now
I doubt “um yeah” was cheering for the death of innocent women and children, just those who were responsible for the attack themselves. Sort of a huge difference that should be pretty clear, unless you equate murderers with innocent bystanders.
Easy for you to say something sitting in the safety of your home. Easy for any one to say anything about the war on Terror when they are nice and combfortable and only care about anything when their way of life is endangered.
This is why I DO NOT SERVE my Country for 95% of the ungrateful, spoiled brats of America nor my crappy government. I SERVE MY COUNTRY for My Wife and those that SERVE Next to me, not the 95% TRASH that is what was once a great Nation.
Thank you 9/11 families for speaking out about Zero Dark Thirty and the politicizing of this film.
Lately, our government is seriously crossing the line of free speech. Our government compelled a witch hunt and ‘lynching’ of the producer of the film (granted a really bad film) as the cause for the Benghazi uprising. It was wrong and not accurate, but used to take the focus off what really did happen. Unfortunately, our government chooses to not explore the details. “They are dead. What does it matter?”, Hillary Clinton, Sec of State, USA.
And, now, the government has decided to thrash Zero Dark Thirty over water boarding and other ‘secrets’ which may have been exposed. Again, this is all political theater.
This is a film, not a documentary. The government has no business getting involved whatsoever. And, that applies to positive government support for a film like Lincoln. It is almost as offensive to see the Senate screening of Lincoln along with Bill Clinton’s Globe appearance presenting Lincoln for best picture as watching this process about Zero Dark Thirty.
Again, my deepest appreciation to the 9/11 families for taking a public stand on behalf of free speech and filmmaking.
Please, never lose your voice.
One of the best posts I’ve ever read on here. Thank you.
Professor
+ 1.
Thank you.
I wish this had come sooner.
While I don’t agree with any attempts or even discussion of censoring this or any other movie, calling this movie “history” or even an “outstanding film” is pure drivel.
I HAD BEEN INTERESTED IN EXACTLY WHAT WATER BOARDING IS AND AFTER SEEING ZERO DARK THIRTY HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT TOURTURE ACTUALLY IS AND IT IS WELL DESERVED TO THOSE WHO HAVE NO REGARD FOR LIFE.
WHAT OUR MILITARY DOES IN ORDER TO GET INFORMATION TO KEEP US AND OUR COUNTRY SAFE IS ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING TO GET ANSWERS AND UNDER NO CONDITIONS SHOULD IT BE LESSENED…THE FILM DESERVES CREDIT AND I APPLAUD KATHRYN BIGLOW FOR HELPING US NOT ONLY UNDERSTAND, BUT SHOWING US AND THE FAMILIES WHO HAVE LOST LOVED ONES THAT SOME JUSTICE IS DONE TO A SMALL EXTENT – ANY OF OUR POLITICIANS WHO OBJECT TO THIS FILM, SHOULD NOT BE IN OFFICE!
There is no need to write your entire post in capital letters.
2,996 tragic reasons to see this film.
Why is everyone talking about the torture scenes in Zero Dark Thirty?
Is everyone missing the REAL problem here? The movie was BORING! It only got exciting in the last act. Everything else was a torture to watch! That’s what we shall all be talking about…
(I love Chastain though…)
Of all the people to talk about the film, it’s the families of the victims. More power to them.
What you mean is more power to the victims’ families who agree with you. There are many, MANY families of 9/11 victims who strenuously opposed the Iraq war and have strenuously opposed the rendition and torture policies.
+1
I am Australian, and as a nation we also lost our countrymen in the 9/11 attacks. We have followed America into every battle you’ve fought. A lot of Americans are unaware of this. Your military saved our asses in WW2, so I don’t have an issue with our troops helping you fight your wars.
Like another poster, I didn’t know what waterboarding was, and so I watched one scene (I closed my eyes for the other torture scenes). I don’t need those images in my head.
ZD30 is a movie…inspired by actual events. It is not a documentary although it has a certain fly on the wall feel to it. It strikes me as more than a little ironic that certain politicians feel they have the right to interfere in freedom of speech, or an art form that America does better than any other country in the world (on the whole). Isn’t that one of the reasons used to go fight in the first place? To help bring democracy and freedom of speech to lands run by dictators?
I support the letter written above by people who lost their loved ones in a tragedy they will never recover from. They, too have the right to freely speak out. Who better to recognize and honor the thousands of people who give their lives every single day to help keep this country (and many others) safe?
ZERO DARK THIRTY is a 100% complete work of fiction. The Navy Seals who “captured” Bin Laden, would confirm that for you if only by a monumental coincidence, they just happen to be dead right now.
The United States, as with so many other “civilized” countries, has long tortured people, whether guilty or innocent. Indeed, it was one of the first things to be outsourced in this global, progressive world we all live in.
Sadly, the survivors and families of 9/11 victims have been so used and lied to, that some actually have started believing in the whole Bin Laden myth. And there lies the real crime!
Did you take your Meds this morning? I think you should probably consider doing so
That letter is one of greatest “put downs” I’ve ever read.
Great letter (very personal), and yes — those Dem Senators can forever lick my shoe after reading that.
Yep, noteworthy “Dem” senator John McCain.
When I finally saw “Zero Dark Thirty” I understood the film was a fictional account of the last 10 years of “The War On Terror”. The torture didn’t disturb me because I knew it was a film. Also, there have been far worse REAL incidents of torture posted on the internet. Do people forget innocent people were beheaded and the video was posted online? Far worse than an actor being fake waterboarded by another dumpy actor who should invest in a hair brush.
I don’t agree or disagree with torture as a method to get information. I am not in the CIA. I don’t know the ins and outs of what has been proven to be effective in real life. And the movie doesn’t agree or disagree either. It does show that torture really didn’t work and the info that “lead to Bin Laden” was obtained without it. So I’m failing to see the problem so many people have with the torture depicted in the film.
Not saying my feeling is what everyone should feel when watching the movie. But I do think many should really stop acting like the film pissed in their bowl of cornflakes.
I wonder if we would’ve received the same intelligence if we would’ve sat the same Terrorists we interrogated down and asked simply, “Can you pretty, PRETTY please give us the location of Osama bin Laden? With a cherry on top??”
I wonder how the families of the victims of the next act of Terrorism would respond if we came out and said, “There is a possibility the deaths of your loved ones could’ve been avoided, but we didn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings or make anyone uncomfortable. We’re sure you understand.”
Did you even watch the movie? The name of Osama Bin Laden’s courier was actually volunteered but that information was in a file that no one took the time to look at for years. No torture was needed. Our police and FBI agents get information from criminals daily without torture. How? Well they use their brains, psychology and good detective work. Imagine that. The people who use torture are usually third world dictators using torture to get political prisoners to admit to things they did NOT do. Torture is the lazy approach for the weak minded.
Adams —
LaLa Land is a nice, cozy place, but there is a world that exists outside of your purple-tinted window where bad people do unimaginably horrific things.
It is clear as the sky is blue that you are basing your comments on personal opinion from your snuggly couch in LaLa Land with ZERO experience in some of the darker places of this barbaric world.
BELIEVE ME when I say “YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW”. Go back to sleep and dream pretty dreams while those that are protecting you do so by whatever means necessary for the individual situation.
Good for the families for speaking common sense. This whole controversy is simply zany.
If Osama bin Laden had been killed under a GOP administration and Zero Dark Thirty had come out under a GOP administration, McCain would have NEVER opened his mouth about the “torture” scenes in the film. FACT.
We tortured a few terrorists. We also killed hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq who were simply trying to fight off the invaders(us). We would have done the same.
Yet nobody is talking about bringing Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld to trial for war crimes.
Funny, when I went to a major-chain movie theater to see ZDT, no one stepped between me and the ticket machine, no one blocked my entry to the auditorium. The experience has been the same for tens of millions of Americans. If anyone had the desire to censor this film, they have failed miserably.
Seriously, is there anyone who wished to see this film who has been prevented from doing so? No? Then it’s not censorship. It is nothing more than a free and open discussion of the film’s issues and merits, guaranteed to us by the very Constitution our brave soldiers fight to protect and defend. If anything, the controversy has drawn attention – and audiences – to a film that, despite the exemplary efforts of a sterling cast, plays mostly as a bone-dry police procedural.
As to whether the controversy has influenced the awards races, perhaps the Academy simply feels that the director of Point Break has enough Oscars. As for myself, I found Argo far more compelling than Law & Order: Islamabad.
I don’t usually site this guy, but you have to read Michael Moore’s position on this along with this letter to have a true appreciation of the spectrum of interpretation this film sparked. that’s the mark of a good piece of work. I applaud the families for speaking out. Less applause for Sony for using it as a marketing tool against the silly tirades of a few actors and some misguided senate people (there are a lot of those these days).
Never Forget.
Are we actually having a debate about whether it’s right to torture another human being?…
Wow.
Personally, I thought the scene where Maya sifts through hundreds of videos of torture sessions made the point that nearly all of the torture results were worthless.
the movie shows that while we allegedly tortured people, bin laden was not caught. once we started using our brains and solid police work, bin laden was caught! this movie is the most anti torture movie ever, but too many of our politicians are too stupid to understand it. they should just butt out of art.
All my years of movie-going have conditioned me to cheer for the guy getting tortured, not the guy (or gal,) doing it, and I’m too old to change now-if saying this is censorship, so be it!
It seems to me some people, including the victims families, are missing the point entirely. (Please bare in mind I have not seen the movie, so I am merely repeating the accusations I have heard). The issue is not that it contains (historically accurate) torture scene. The issue is that the film, allegedly, portrays torture as being crucial to finding obl, when in actual fact it was merely a waste of time.
America the beautiful.