Ray Richmond is contributing to Deadline’s TCA coverage.
The CW took center stage at TCA in Pasadena this morning with a supersized panel of 9 actors and 4 executive producers representing The Carrie Diaries, the new ensemble Sex And The City prequel that premieres tomorrow night at 8. One obvious question was why this show wound up on CW rather than, say, HBO, the home of its predecessor. “We always felt this was predestined for The CW,” stressed exec producer Josh Schwartz.”
Fellow exec producer Amy B. Harris, a Sex And The City staff writing alum who is running Carrie Diaries, related that Warner Bros. originally asked Sex showrunner Michael Patrick King if he was interested in turning writer Candace Bushnell’s book into a series, but he was busy with CBS’ 2 Broke Girls and suggested they approach Harris. “It just felt right in every way for The CW to be the perfect home for it”, she said. It gave us the chance to tell fun, provocative high school stories.” In other words, HBO perhaps would have proved too niche-y and limiting for the soapier series the producers had in mind.
Bushnell was asked why the Carrie Bradshaw whom we see in Carrie Diaries is somewhat younger than the one in her book. She called the fact her character is now 16 and a virgin invading New York City for the first time “an evolution, just as the Sex and the City franchise itself has evolved over time… The reality is, books and TV series are like apples
and oranges. A book has a beginning, a middle and an end, whereas a TV series you want to go on and on and on. There are certain requirements of a series that shape a lot of the decisions in taking a book to series. You have to kind of throw everything out and start over.” She professed that she “couldn’t be happier” with the way the series has turned out.
Related: ‘Cult’ Producers On “Putting A Magnifying Glass” On The Darker Side Of Fandom
What does TV’s original Carrie Bradshaw, Sarah Jessica Parker, think of the new, younger version of her? Carrie Diaries star AnnaSophia Robb said Parker sent her a congratulatory note after she landed the part and says she’s been “great and unbelievably supportive, just so generous and magnanimous. She said, ‘I’m so happy you’re carrying this torch’.” Other than that, Harris said that one of the major challenges of the new series has been to keep the nostalgic integrity of the 1984 period in which it’s set while shooting on the streets of Manhattan. “Every single extra goes through hair and makeup to be absolutely ’80s,” she said. “Being authentic to the period is really important.”


Can’t wait for the premiere tomorrow!!! It’s going to be soooo good!
Sorry, but it’s not.
Authentic 80′s ? Really ?
About as authentic 80′s as Elsa’s (RHMIAMI) authentic determination to age gracefully…
I give it 2 months .
I thought after that awful SATC 2 movie, all the life had been rung out of this thing.
There’s no such thing anymore, now that Hollywood has discovered the insta-reboot.
Just wait tip this runs its five year (or more) course and turns into a reboot of “Sex in the City.”
Didn’t the authentically ’80′s version of this show star Sarah Jessica Parker? I think it was called Square Pegs.
Look, the show’s obviously going to be bad, but it’s not hard to stay afloat on the anemic CW. Hopefully the outfits are top-notch at least.
Noooooooo!!!!!!! This must not exist.
CW is just desperate for a hit show right now as most everything else on there isn’t working too well. They have a lot of pressure form their corporate partners to get something done and get those ratings up, or the CW will be no more in a year or two’s time.
I love all the doom-sayers on here. Arrow is a hit by CW standards. Vamp Diaries and Supernatural are doing OK. Nikita is lasting on Friday nights longer than anybody would have guessed. I’m no SATC fan, but this can’t be any worse than Gossip Girl. We shall see.
Although I plan on checking out The Carrie Diaries I do feel like this show will be hit or miss. People are either going to connect with the character and love it..or be put off by the fact that it bares no resemblance to SATC.
The show is passable but the clothes are all wrong. They fit people too well. Clothes in the 80s were either too baggy or too bunchy and tight. Where’s the shoulder pads on the women’s suits? Where’s the bad hair and make-up? Where’s the high-top Reeboks and leg warmers? Where’s the teen breakdancers and boomboxes on the street corners? Where’s the Jheri-curls? They got the cars right but everything else looks fake.
The show is awful and has noting that sparks of the wonder that Carrie Bradshaw sees in life.
I completely agree about the lack of costume authenticity! The extras’ (and a few of the main charachters’) costumes look pretty dead-on 80′s– BUT Carrie’s are a weak 2013 interpretation of what 80′s clothing was. A red peplum top with a fitted bodice and cap sleeves? Really? in 1984…? An avocado-green plastic necklace set in gold metal? And don’t even get me started on carrie’s makeup. Where’s the peachy shadow with blue eyeliner? Where’s the all-plastic jewelry? Where are the hair clips? ….I’m sure someone made a conscious decision to make Carrie’s outfits stand out or seem more relatable to teens today… meanwhile, those of us who enjoy fashion history cringe….