Two producers today sued the Walt Disney Company claiming the company lifted their idea for a Christmas movie. “The ABC television movie, The 12 Dates Of Christmas, is nothing more than a hijacking of the Idea which was originally pitched by Plaintiffs to Defendants and the treatment which was given to ABC executives by the Plaintiffs, cloned and re-written in a crude attempt to
conceal the brazen theft of the Idea,” alleges the Breach of Contract suit (read it here). Beth Grossbard and Barri Rosenblum, who goes by the professional name Barri Evins, are seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages from Disney, ABC, ABC Family and former ABC executive Beth Miller. In the complaint filed in LA Superior Court Monday, the duo allege that they and writer Denise Gruska met with then ABC Family Director of Development Miller and ABC Family VP of Original Programming Donna Ebbs on December 13, 2005 at ABC’s Burbank offices in a pitch meeting for their I Hate Christmas idea. It was from that meeting the Plaintiffs say that the idea for Miller-produced 2011 ABC Family movie The 12 Dates Of Christmas was hatched at their expense. In their four count complaint, including breach of confidence and breach of implied-in-fact contract, the duo have requested a four-day jury trial.
Unlike many such suits, Grossbard and Rosenblum are industry veterans. Grossbard has executive produced numerous movies of the week including The Christmas Shoes and its sequel for CBS and The Christmas Hope for Lifetime in 2009. Rosenblum served as president of Halloween producers Debra Hill Productions among other industry jobs.
The duo and Gruska seemed to think that their sitdown with the ABC execs went well. At the 2005 meeting today’s complaint claims that “both Ms. Ebbs and Ms. Miller thought the Idea was great and said they thought it was ‘unique.’ Ms. Ebbs and Ms. Miller said they would discuss the Idea internally and get back to Plaintiffs.” A few days later, the trio handed over a detailed eight-page treatment of the proposed film about a woman forced to relive Christmas with her ex-boyfriends over and over. The suit claims that “a few months after the pitch meeting,” Ebbs told Grossbard and Rosenblum that that they “had given the idea considerable thought, but said they were passing because the story might not be best for ABC Family.” That would have been the end of it except that in December 2011 ABC Family aired The 12 Dates Of Christmas. The TV movie was executive produced by Miller, who was no longer at ABC. “There are a considerable number of similarities between the Plaintiffs’ Idea and the ABC Family television movie, The 12 Dates Of Christmas,” claims the complaint. Of course, the fact that the Plaintiffs themselves refer to their idea as “a girl’s version of Groundhog Day” and that I Hate Christmas itself has elements that are derivative of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol isn’t going to make their argument for originality easy. Attorney Stephen Goldberg represents Grossbard and Rosenblum.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


Beth Miller should have called the plaintiffs and told them she was reviving their movie project, she was stupid for not doing that. ABC Family will pay them because they were clearly ripped off. Their writer will have to be paid as well because she lost a story credit. No way ABC lets this go to a jury it will be settled quickly and quietly.
I agree, they’ll settle fast. And that’s too bad, because a jury trial would give a much-needed glimpse of the way that ABC Family’s “creative” execs operate. Not a pretty picture.
YOU CANT GET AHEAD BY STEALING, DOSENT EVERYONE KNOW THAT BY NOW
Every production at every studio attracts BS lawsuits like this from failed writers, who think their ideas are so unbelievably unique that when anything in the same genre gets made, they presume it must have been stolen from their work. All conceptual ideas are derivative. Many lazy writers come into many lazy studios over the many years with exactly the same lame high concept notions. Why would a studio or producer wait 6 years and then steal an idea if the original pitch was so incredibly brilliant?
It was stolen from the two producers. These producers are the ones who were ripped off here and they are very credible. The reason ABC Family waited so long is because when it was first pitched ABC Family was not in the business of doing Christmas movies. Then they realized it was worth doing. The current execs at ABC Family were in the dark they had no idea this exact pitch was first offered to Beth Miller six years previously.
Beth Miller is the only person who was working there when it was first pitched. She decided to use specific elements from their pitch she is the thief but ABC Family is liable for her wrong doing. You should read the actual lawsuit it’s very compelling. They were ripped off the evidence in the complaint explains how and where very clearly.
You clearly have never worked at a studio. If a studio makes a movie about the President getting kidnapped, writers from the past 30 years come out of the woodwork and say “I pitched a now dead executives in 1986 an idea about a tall blonde President named Bob.” Clearly the studio waited for years to steal this incredible idea despite risk of losing it to another clever buyer in the hopes of not having to pay for it. If Beth stole it, sue her. Otherwise, leave the studio out of it. Studios spend far too much money on frivolous lawsuits from delusional writers.
Categorically untrue, Mr. Claus.
In 2005, ABC FAMILY was very much in the business of making Christmas movies. But I’m sure that would have taken you only about eight to ten seconds to verify online, so I can see why you made such an innocent mistake.
Furthermore, one of the movies they were developing in 2005 was ALREADY a Christmas-themed ripoff of “Groundhog Day” called “Christmas Do-Over” which aired in 2006. In fact, there have been, off the top of my head, at least FOUR TV movie “Groundhog Day” rips involving Christmas, up to and including “12 Dates.”
If there are any lawsuits to be thrown around, it’s “Groundhog Day” writer Danny Rubin who should be suing all of them.
But between 2005 when this project was allegedly pitched and when “12 Dates” was made, Beth Miller would have heard anywhere from dozens to hundreds of Christmas TV movie pitches.
They are all the same. The same themes and ideas and premises keep coming up again and again and again. Take a look at the ABC FAMILY Christmas roster – they’re all very much of a piece. The vast majority boil down to – “Single gal at Christmas is stuck between two guys. Also, there’s magic.”
It is entirely reasonable and likely that other writers could have easily come up with the same “unique” elements in the 2005 “Hate Christmas” pitch five years later. Hell, it’s not just likely, it’s inevitable.
This is the very definition of a frivolous lawsuit. If your idea was that good, they would have bought it. People don’t steal ideas in Hollywood as much as crappy writers would like to think they do.
Typical Disney.
Disney wastes little time in suing anyone and everyone who merely alludes to a Disney character or references a Disney film, but Disney has no qualms about stealing from others and using logos and trademarked icons without permission.
P.S. I just want to add that I have experienced Disney’s hypocrisy first-hand. I have worked for, at least, two entities whose legal departments, upon my alert, have sent cease and desist letterts to Disney, only to be ignored until they deemed it necessary to comply.
I’ve worked with Beth Grossbard and I’ve worked with Disney. Beth has integrity, Disney does not. I have yet to meet a person in our industry that has a positive thing to say about Disney and their business practices.