
It intrigues me that Christopher Walken’s latest film — which just signed for North American release by Steelyard Pictures — is titled The Power Of Few. I’ve never heard of this distributor, and maybe the film is a cinematic treat, but I’m reasonably certain this movie will come and go with little fanfare. The title is memorable because it summarizes perfectly how I wish iconic actors like Walken would run their careers. I was thinking about this over the weekend, when I again watched Django Unchained and observed how the whole movie changed from the moment that Samuel L. Jackson first came into view as the awful plantation slave patriarch Stephen. I find it one of the most memorable performances I’ve seen in the last five years, a villain to rival any Spaghetti Western antagonist ever, and am amazed how Jackson disappeared into a fully fleshed character as completely as Daniel Day-Lewis did with Lincoln and Joaquin Phoenix did in The Master, and Denzel Washington did in Flight. All three of those guys got nominated for Oscars, and Sam did not, even though it’s his best performance since Pulp Fiction. It’s easy to say it came down to Christoph Waltz’s Best Supporting Actor nomination (Leo DiCaprio was also snubbed), but I think a factor is that Jackson works so often that Oscar voters discount his great performances because it’s just one of the seven films he did in that calender year. Contrast that to Day-Lewis. When he works, you know it’s a special event, there is high anticipation and he either wins or gets nominated almost each and every time out.
To me, Walken is in the same class as Jackson, and so is Robert De Niro and Al Pacino and Anthony Hopkins, and so would Sean Connery and Gene Hackman if anybody could coax those guys out of retirement. Kevin Costner is knocking on the door as well.
De Niro got an Oscar nom for Silver Linings Playbook, and it seemed to work in reverse; it seemed to help that this was the first movie in a long time where the material wasn’t beneath his vast talent, and that he proved he still had it.
As for Walken, I was at the Toronto Film Festival premiere of the Martin McDonagh-directed Seven Psychopaths last fall, and observed something rare. Gifted with dialogue from In Bruges‘ McDonagh, Walken had people cheering to just about every line he delivered, in his singular style. I wish guys like him would save themselves for just the really good stuff (like De Niro and Pacino in Heat and De Niro in Silver Linings Playbook), instead of leaving a trail of cinematic turds along the way.
Do a movie a year; take up golf, and work that putter until the good roles from talented writer-directors like Quentin Tarantino, McDonagh, Michael Mann, Paul Thomas Anderson, David O Russell or a handful of others come in. Actually, Sam Jackson is a prolific golfer, but when I interviewed him for Playboy years ago, he said a crowning moment in his career came when he asked for and started to receive “greens fees” and temporary memberships to the best golf courses in whatever city he works in, so he could play whenever he wasn’t shooting. The man just likes to work, and even then his reps were begging him to be more selective. A final note about Sam: I’ve seen recent attention paid to “leaked” Internet video from an interview where Jackson tried to get some interviewer to say the “N” word or he wouldn’t discuss its use in Django Unchained. The implication was that Sam was somehow difficult or confrontational. I’m telling you, if you don’t walk away from Sam Jackson without getting the interview of your life, it’s because you are no good at doing interviews.
I remember sitting at the Sunset Marquis for hours with Sam, who’s funny as hell (he pulled up in a new Porsche, and said straight up that he’d bought stick shift because his daughter could only drive automatic), and had endless colorful stories about films and life. It knocked me out of my chair when this spectacularly cool guy talked plainly about his rough early days as a crack addict and how, as a party trick back in those days, he would put a match up one nostril and pull it out of the other because he had snorted away all the cartilage in between. When I saw that journalistic “stand-off,” it seemed to me that this was a byproduct of the Internet age, where a testy interview exchange with Jackson or Tarantino (also a dream interview subject, who bounces off the walls with fresh ideas and anecdotes and an encyclopedic film brain) seems to now have more buzz-building currency than actual good conversation.
That brings me back around to The Power Of Few. Everybody is so overexposed these days — how about the breathless “exclusive” in The Wrap last week about how some other journalistic outlet was doing a big story on Legendary Pictures, its future at Warner Bros and the Godzilla lawsuit, and then you read The New York Times story today and there is nothing in there that we didn’t already know except that Thomas Tull played minor-league baseball? I think these actors are hurting their brands and their legacies by making too damn many movies beneath their talent, in a Kardashian age where it’s easy to believe that if people aren’t being seen, they don’t exist.
Day-Lewis admirably proves there’s a lot to be said for the idea that less is more. Or maybe I should have another cup of coffee and resign myself to the fact that this is just how it is now and even iconic treasures like Walken, De Niro, Jackson and Pacino get insecure like everybody else and sometimes say yes to work that is beneath them because they’re afraid the phone is going to stop ringing.
Here’s the release on The Power Of Few:
Steelyard Pictures has announced its North American distribution deal for Leone Marucci’s “The Power of Few” with Gaiam Vivendi Entertainment. The sci-fi action feature stars Christopher Walken, Christian Slater, Anthony Anderson, Jesse Bradford and Q’orianka Kilcher.
The deal includes all North American ancillary rights with Steelyard distributing theatrically, limited platform release opens on February 15th. “We’re excited to bring this unique theatrical experience to moviegoers across the US” Steelyard’s Roy Kurtluyan remarked, “And we’re thrilled to have a partner in Gaiam Vivendi Entertainment. As the largest independent, they clearly understand how to maximize exposure within a shifting distribution landscape.” Alex Barder of Strategic Film Partners negotiated the deal for the producers with Sam Toles, Vice President of Gaiam Vivendi Entertainment. Arclight Film is repping internationally.
http://thepoweroffew.com/press
Opening Dates & Locations
February 15thColumbus, OH – AMC Lennox 24
Youngstown, OH – Boardman Tinseltown
February 22nd
Los Angeles, CA – Rave Cinemas 18, Howard Hughes
New Orleans, LA – The Theatres at Canal Place
Baton Rouge, LA – Cinemark Perkins Rowe
March 1st
Philadelphia, PA – UA Riverview Plaza 17
Boulder, CO – Century Theatre
March 8th
Additional locations to be announced


An insightful post, Mike. Really enjoyed reading it.
Well said, Mike.
This artcile is really from a selfish fan perspective. These guys love to act, they live to act. Just because they are incredible at it and have received the top accolades, does that mean they have to scale back on what they love doing the most to maintain some sort of pretige? These guys have done it all, they are living legends, and it’s not exactly bad to have them acting in several films while teaching and sometimes mentoring new talent. Yes, I understand the point the article is trying to make and it’s understandable, but a little too idealistic.
But look at Nicholson – for the most part, they’ve protected his image by keeping him away from crap. Sure, I’m not the biggest fan of THE BUCKET LIST and HOW DO YOU KNOW was unwatchable, but he’s still working with big name directors instead of doing work that is beneath him like: (for Pacino) THE STAND UP GUYS (poorly written & directed, should not have even been presented to the actors); JACK & JILL; RIGHTEOUS KILL; 88 MINUTES (no one of Pacino or De Niro’s class should be getting in bed with Avi Learner and his awful films, payday or not); GIGLI; (for De Niro): FREELANCERS; NEW YEAR’S EVE; KILLER ELITE; STONE; HIDE AND SEEK; GODSEND; 15 MINUTES … all those films damage the image.
Now I will give De Niro credit for EVERYBODY’S FINE – which he gave a fine performance, and the film was pretty good – it was just completely marketed wrong. And to Al for YOU DON’T KNOW JACK – great performance, the old Al doing some of his best work.
But you don’t see Nicholson working for Avi and simply taking a pay day.
Regarding Nicholson, I don’t think he has the hunger for acting that Jackson, Walken, and DeNiro still have. He’s still partying like it’s 1985.
Wait, so actors shouldn’t work so much but it’s okay if Jackson makes seven pictures a year? Doesn’t make sense.
And y’know, some actors just like to keep busy. And even a less than epic movie can still entertain. STAND-UP GUYS isn’t anyone’s idea of a masterpiece, but watching Walken and Pacino bounce off each other as well as Arkin and the rest of the cast made for a very enjoyable ride.
As well as a passion for acting, these guys have got bills to pay.
Walken and Jackson are both repped by the same agent and have been for a long time. Wonder how the agent is reacting to this story? Hard to disagree with the truth here.
And maybe Walken just needs the money and doesn’t get good scripts cause he isn’t fashionable or big these days?
True story: as I was watching “Django” I said to myself ‘who is this guy’ during an early appearance of the character Stephen. I didn’t recognize the actor and thought it was a complex and wonderful part for a newcomer. I did not know it was Samuel L. Jackson. I swear.
I was not aware of him being in the film; didn’t recall his name attached to it. It remains one of the pleasures of seeing the film.
btw: actors aren’t really ‘snubbed’ from nominations; others get one of the five. My main gripe in the category is that Philip Seymour Hoffman plays the title character in “The Master” and appears in 80% of the film and yet was nominated as a ‘supporting’ actor. In the days of “Midnight Cowboy” for instance, it would have been ludicrous for the producers to suggest that Voight was the ‘lead’ and Hoffman, the ‘support.’ Both were nominated as leads — which they were. Ah for the return of the real ‘support’ roles–Beatrice Straight in “Network” and Judi Dench in “Skakespeare in Love” for example.
Me too. I finally watched Django over the weekend and even though I’d seen his name in the credits, it took me a couple of minutes to realize it was Sam. He was fantastic in the role.
Do they really cheer at those festivals? And, yes, parts of this were a tad “fanboy-ish.”
Mike,
Nice article except I do and do not agree.
I agree they need to search out good material. Unfortunately some of the worst material comes from the hot writer of the moment when in fact there are great scripts littered all over the halls of every agency. Sometimes you get guys like Viggo M. who will ready anything. These are the actors. Walken should demand his agent bring him the 10 best scripts on no list, with no credits. I guarantee you they are often better than A list rewriter Joe Smith’s latest. In fact, let’s take Craig Mazin. I guarantee you take his name off a script and put it up against any good unknown script and Walken will not choose the Mazin turd. Nothing against Mazin. But he is no John August. He’s lucky.
I make it a point to see every movie shown at the local independent theater whether Landmark or Angelica etc.. That’s how great script are found. See those movies and you give the next a chance. See Spiderman 43 and you only harm yourself.
Thank you, Mike.
+1
just took a look at the trailer to this film, THE POWER OF FEW… Looks more original than anything I’ve seen come out of Hollywood in a long time. I don’t know much about this hack Mike Fleming Jr, not sure how he has a platform on Deadline with his tendency to bash indie films before he even views them… must be on a studio’s payroll.
Well, Mike is sure full of himself today.
One jarring note: he’s 65. Crack didn’t exist in his younger days. So coke, maybe freebasing it, although cartridge damage comes from snorting. Otherwise, I agree that iconic actors really shouldn’t do crap movies. Oh, and Stephen is his best role since “Jackie Brown,” still my favorite Tarantino movie.
I agree with everything you said except i don’t think its a bad thing for film. As these stars over saturate the market with crap movies the power of big names starts to wain. So to will their outrageous pay checks meaning smaller budgets for good films. Hopefully this will cause producers to take more risks, giving the viewers more awesome films. Or maybe I’m just a dreamer.
Pacino get insecure like everybody else and sometimes say yes to work that is beneath them because they’re afraid the phone is going to stop ringing.
^^ This says a mouthful. These guys don’t need to work, but as they look toward mortality (and it happens to all of us over the age of 50), you want to remain relevant, you want to keep working because it keeps you going.
I said after seeing Django Unchained that Samuel L. Jackson gave the best performance by miles, then Christoph Waltz, Leo Dicaprio, Jamie Foxx and Don Johnson with Kerry Washington too.
So, I was shocked that across the board Jackson didn’t receive any major nominations or win more but instead awards went to Walz or Dicaprio (who are both my fav too and yes, I’m desperate for Dicaprio to win an Oscar too).
Maybe, Jackson might get some more award recognition this year, if there is still any justice left.
As for Christopher Walken, he’s a true legend and nothing will change that. With any acting role, it can be a hit or a miss in performance or the total movie as a whole. It’s excellent that stars like Walken, Jackson, Pacino, Denzel Washington and De Niro help out the younger generation more and continue to work. I love their flexibility and actually take more risk, whether hit or miss.
Oh, interesting article to read, and anything with all these guys that I have mentioned, I will be watching.
Hardly anybody’s seen it, and the film’s not that good overall, but Walken’s performance in The Last Quartet is one of his best in years – wonderful integrity, a reminder of just how great a serious actor (cf. Deer Hunter, Heaven’s Gate) he is, in addition to his comic genius.
if it’s opening at the riverview in philly, it’s barely opening.
Funny, I thought Bill Nighy was slumming it in LOVE, ACTUALLY, Mike. I guess some of this turd calling is subjective?
Why is no one talking about Christopher Walken in A LATE QUARTET??? An amazing, understated Oscar caliber performance that was completely overlooked this awards season.
Sorry but De Niro’s problem hasn’t been inferior material. Except for Sliver Linings and a few others, he’s been a major disappointment, calling it in for quite a while now, relying on past glory and exhibiting a narrow range. Glad he’s back but Silver Linings is an exception. Anthony Hopkins, OTOH, has never stopped growing and astonishing. Ditto the younger Philip Seymour Hoffman who consistantly takes the smallest of roles, some in inferior movies, and turns them into small miracles, without ever repeating himself, revealing his technique or hitting a false note. From Twister to The Master and everything in between he’s unmatched by his age peers and can stand tall with the older group you single out here.
Strange how we are suddenly in a world where the subjective, random ponderings of an internet blogger are sold to us as hard coin journalism.
Because, if you’re an indie film like “A Late Quartet,” and not cultivated by an organization posing as a film festival (Sundance), and then celebrated by that same organization… then you’re at the mercy of bitter web bloggers like Mike Fleming who’s greatest skill in knowing how to type on a keyboard and probably hasn’t watched a non-studio film in 10 years. They don’t look at films like “A Late Quartet” or talk about them, because they are not paid to. Welcome to American cinema in the 21st Century.
Mr. Fleming’s musings about once-acclaimed actors now dropping lousy movies on a regular basis like “turds” reminds me of a day in 1976 when I was working on a movie in New Mexico with Walter Matthau. I was still new to the business (and still idealistic) and as I sat in Matthau’s trailer in a remote New Mexico location, I picked up a copy of Hollywood Reporter lying on the floor unread and I was shocked to read that Matthau’s buddy Jack Lemmon had signed for the lead in one of those lousy “Airport” sequels. When I asked Walter (even funnier in person than in ANY of his movies) why on earth would Jack Lemmon lower himself to appear in such an obvious piece of garbage, Matthau said: “You don’t understand. Jack needs the money.” I looked at him incredulously, and he replied: “In this business, however much money you make you always spend more. That’s why all of us often do crap. To pay the bills!” I felt that Matthau was putting me on, but after a few more years of toiling in this business, I finally realized he was dead serious. From Matthau’s mouth to your ears, Mr. Fleming!
Tarantino a dream interview subject? You obviously haven’t seen this…
http://www.channel4.com/news/tarantino-uncut-when-quentin-met-krishnan-transcript
Desperately wishing Quentin finally gets over his 70s shlock trip and matures past a mental age of 14.