Here’s another 11th hour retransmission consent agreement — not a moment too soon for Sinclair, which has its hands full with its new station acquisition deals. The broadcaster recently told DirecTV customers that “it does not appear” they’d be successful in extending their carriage deal which expires tonight. But Sinclair now says it has “a short-term extension of its existing agreement” that will “allow the parties to enter into a formal agreement.” DirecTV also says that Sinclair’s 87 stations in 47 markets will air ”without interruption as the companies continue working toward a new agreement.” A breakdown could have hit Fox especially hard: 24 of Sinclair’s stations are Fox affiliates and another 19 offer Fox-owned MyTV shows. The company also has 12 ABC stations, 16 CW, 11 CBS, 3 NBC, 1 Azteca and 1 Independent affiliate. They didn’t disclose any financial terms, but DirecTV said this month that Sinclair wanted it to to pay “more than twice as much for the same programs that remain available completely free of charge over the air and online.” In August Sinclair and Dish went to the wire in a retransmission dispute, but reached a deal before the stations went dark. DirecTV accounts for about 21% of the more than 27M households that Sinclair reaches.
Sinclair Stations To Stay On DirecTV While They Work Out Retransmission Deal
By DAVID LIEBERMAN, Executive Editor | Thursday February 28, 2013 @ 9:32pm ESTTags: DirecTV, Retransmission Consent Fees, Sinclair Broadcast Group
This article was printed from http://www.deadline.com/2013/02/directv-sinclair-retransmission-consent-deal/
COMMENTS (1)
-
SUBSCRIBE TO DEADLINE NEWS
Marketplace
-
‘Friends’ Reunion – ‘Ellen’
News/Opinion Poll
Loading ...By The Numbers
Title Network Index 1 NCIS CBS 138 2 NCIS: Los Angeles CBS 133 3 La Patrona TELMUN-B 127 4 Criminal Minds CBS 127 5 CSI: Crime Scene CBS 126 6 The Good Wife CBS 125 7 The Mentalist CBS 124 8 Por ella soy Eva UNIV-B 124 9 Blue Bloods CBS 122 10 Amor bravio UNIV-B 121 SOURCE: RENTRAK.COMBox Office Poll
Loading ...Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Twitter @DeadlineNY
CANNES: ‘Jane Got A Gun’ Moving Toward U.S Deal With Relativity/Weinstein Company http://t.co/WINXdE2T44About 4 hours ago

This is the sort of ‘corporate’ behavior that engenders unwise governmental regulation and interference.
Demanding $$ for retransmission of TV broadcasts that are offered ‘free’ to the public is simply misguided greed. Weighing the factors evidences that the broadcasters obtain a substantial number of viewers which in turn allows them to increase the fees paid by their advertisers … reasonable accommodation allows viewers and the cable and satellite companies to mutually benefit.
All the parties to these deals are better served by cooperation than they would be by FCC regulation … and frankly, it wouldn’t be difficult for government legislators and bureaucrats to ensnare this whole mess into the nation’s foolish and costly regulatory scheme. Don’t give them the opportunity!