Don Groves is a Deadline contributor based in Sydney
Documents released by the New Zealand government today reveal more of the intense nature of the 2010 dispute over The Hobbit which threatened to move production out of the country. Included are emails between Peter Jackson and government officials which further crystallize the ire in the Shire over the aggressive tactics and demands of New Zealand Actors’ Equity and its Oz-based umbrella, The Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance — which repped a small amount of actors — during their campaign to unionize the production. The turmoil ultimately calmed when the government amended the labor laws and gave the Warner Bros production $56M to shoot in the country after Jackson threatened to film elsewhere. Jackson and partner Fran Walsh said today they hope the documents (read them here) will “put to rest the unfounded conspiracy theories that sought to characterize these events as a Hollywood studio dictating terms to a sovereign government — a charge that is as spurious now as it was then.”
The exchanges related to the government and Warner Bros’ deal were initially deemed too commercially sensitive to be released. But a recent ruling under the Official Information Act ordered 18 documents be published by March 1. In one note to ministers, Jackson wrote: “In the end, this is not about Actor’s Equity, nor is it about The Hobbit — it is about an Australian trade union making a blatant play to take a controlling hand in the NZ film industry — for their own political and financial gain.” In a separate email about then-Actors’ Equity head Simon Whipp, the director said the government had “engaged with a snake, who now feels quite fearless… He is in revenge mode, intent on inflicting as much damage as he can to our film, our film industry, to our country. I really can’t [take] much more of this toxic nonsense.”
Via their WingNut Films, Jackson and Walsh said today, “We could have made The Hobbit in Europe, or New South Wales (who offered Warner Bros a huge tax rebate for the film), and earned the same fee for ourselves with a lot less stress. But we fought to keep the film here and work with the actors and crew we love. We think this was worth fighting for and we’d do it again.”


It seems that Jackson and Walsh have been continually on the defensive regarding The Hobbit. Whether it’s animal cruelty claims, or tax breaks, or actors equity, or higher frame rates…almost every interview they give is to try and protect the integrity of the production. And it was a terrible movie which bombed in the US. They are probably deeply regretting doing it.
$300M is a bomb?
Yes, a 300 million dollar domestic gross is a bomb, and we’ve always been at war with Eurasia.
We should all be so lucky as to make a film that so “bombs” in the US. $300M+
Yes, a total bomb. 300 million (a billion worldwide). What a flop.
Over 300M$ domestic is now considered a bomb?
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hobbit.htm
The Hobbit made $300 mil in the USA and is about to reach $1 billion worldwide. I seriously doubt they regret doing the movie.
I actually liked the film itself but agree with everything you say.
And what a load of bull that these filmmakers are spewing about doing the movie in New Zealand because they love “the actors and crew”.
What they love is the low wage standard that allows them to exploit workers unfairly! Jackson writes about the Australian union gaining money from trying to rep NZ actors, well what about Jackson and the studio gaining tons of profit from hiring these actors at such low wages?
People better start waking up – your Hollywood dreams are becoming nightmares.
Sure, they fought for control of their production – who wouldn’t? And they received more money than I will earn in my lifetime for doing it. So who is suffering more?
What are you talking about?
It made almost 1 billion dollars, and it was far from terrible.
I wouldn’t consider $300,952,379 box office as “bombed”.
Couldn’t you have just stopped at ‘And it was a terrible movie’? Would have saved us all the box office nonsense which followed. “It made over $300 million! It made over $300 million! It made a billion worldwide! It’s a billion dollar movie! I’d like to make a billion! What are you talking about, it made $300 million! I wouldn’t consider $300,952,379 as ‘bombed’”.
If he stopped at “it was a terrible movie” he still would have been wrong.
Yeah, they totally regret making a billion dollars worldwide. What an awful decision that was.
Ok so far 8 people have pointed out how much its made but thats not enough! No I haven’t spoken yet and I need to be heard. So here goes.
300 million is hardly a bomb!!!
There now that 9 people have said this you can all stop adding to it.
I’m not sure how you can say the Hobbit “bombed” in the US, as it made over $300 million domestically. Only 5 films released in 2012 made that amount or more. It may not have done quite as well as the first 3 LOTR movies, but I’m not sure anyone thought realistically that the Hobbit would.
As for the 48 fps rate, if you didn’t want to see it in that format, it was very easy to see it at the regular film speed, so its not like people were forced to watch it that way – it just became another option. And like any new technology, some people didn’t like it.
I enjoyed the Hobbit a lot more than I thought I would and eagerly look forward to the next film…
I’d hardly call The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey a bomb; according to Box Office Mojo it has the 4th highest gross of 2012 (behind “Marvel’s The Avengers”, “Skyfall” & “The Dark Knight Rises”; it’s the 5th highest domestic release), which is pretty impressive given that Hobbit was released in late November while most other titles had a longer go of it. Also according to Box Office Mojo the first Hobbit film currently has the 15th highest gross of all time…which places it ahead of such “bombs” as 7 of the 8 Harry Potter movies, all of the Twilight movies & all 4 Spider-Man films. I seriously doubt they are deeply regretting anything except possibly making the Hobbit movies sooner.
Alright everyone, what needs to be said is not the gross again and again, its that the hobbit is a bad, uninspired movie, as in not quite a star wars prequel but getting there. Jackson got screwed out of a couple hundred mil from LOTR series so these movies are mostly about money now and maybe he feels justly compensated for once even if it sucks new zealand’s “money.”
Wow – we have a really insightful group of comments here. Everyone’s talking about how much the film grossed which has absolutely NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ENTIRE ARTICLE!
No wonder Hollywood is going down the tubes creatively – it is full of people who don’t have basic reading comprhension skills. And these are the people who read scripts and determine talent? Lord, Help us all!
Good thing we were responding to the comment and not the article then,eh?
Comes with the territory; maybe we should turn to activism and unionize the commenters? I call to question, is there a second?
I agree Truth. Who cares how much The Hobbit made? The article is not about box office.
Well said Peter Jackson! The real fans of Middle-earth back you 100% We often see only the softer side of Peter Jackson, the Hobbity, barefoot Kiwi with a heart of gold… but I know a director doesn’t get his vision on film without being a real fighter!
Peter Jackson may have a little bit of Frodo and Bilbo within, but he is also part Boromir, Aragorn and Gandalf mixed… not a guy you want to mess with when the chips are down! He is a director who just wants to make movies… but if you get in the way of his creative vision… watch out! I’m personally glad he let this guy Whipp have it… in fact I’d like to see them in the Mordor Thunderdome… Pete would come out victorious!