The miniseries adaptation of The Man In The High Castle was originally announced as a project back in 2010. At the time, the four-parter based on Philip K Dick‘s novel, was to be a Headline Pictures/Electric Shepherd/Scott Free production for the BBC, scripted by British playwright Howard Brenton and sold internationally by FremantleMedia. Some of the puzzle pieces have since shifted. Syfy said today it has sealed a deal to adapt the Hugo Award-winning tome with Frank Spotnitz (The X-Files, Hunted) attached to write and exec produce. Ridley Scott’s Scott Free will produce with Headline, Electric Shepherd Productions (the production arm of Dick’s estate) and FremantleMedia International. Producers are Ridley Scott and Stewart Mackinnon. Spotnitz will write the first two hours and supervise the writing of the second two hours, Syfy said today.
Dick’s novel is an alternate history story set in a world in which Nazi Germany and Japan were victorious in the second World War. The year is 1962 and the Axis Powers occupy the U.S., where fascism rules and the few surviving Jews hide under assumed names. Scott’s 1982 sci-fi classic Blade Runner was adapted from Dick’s Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?

A great novel and it could be a TV classic, if adapted intelligently.
Agreed. It’s a very haunting story…
It is a classic novel, but the “oh, oh, only a dream” ending will irk television viewers, even with the clever twist at the end.
Hopefully Scot Free will lavish more attention (and a budget) that HBO did for “Fatherland.”
My first thought was that of all the PKD stuff out there, this feels the most dated, the most “of its time.” But my second thought was that if ANYONE can wring something brilliant from it, it’s Frank Spotnitz.
Could be good, unfortunately it’s ended up at Syfy. With the exception of Battlestar Galactica and Dune they’ve been the home of mediocrity. I certainly hope I’m wrong about it’s prospects, an author as wonderful as PKD deserves better (if not the best).
Warehouse 13 mediocre? I don’t think so
Cool. I’m reading this right now.
The MITHC ending is not “Oh, oh, only a dream.” It is vintage Philip Dick–the perception that much of what we take for reality is in fact illusory. And in the case of this novel, that a whole society, a whole world, can be an illusion. Mystical, yes, but not to be confused with the “only a dream” technique in “Newhart” or “Dallas.”