
Related: Esquire Channel? NBCU In Talks With Hearst About G4 Partnership
Beginning April 22, the G4 network will be rebranded the Esquire Network in a partnership between NBCUniversal and Hearst Magazines to create a television network for upscale males. Owned and operated by NBCU, Esquire Network will be helmed by G4 General Manager Adam Stotsky, who will work closely with David Granger, Editor in Chief of Esquire magazine, to develop the brand. G4′s flagship competition series American Ninja Warrior will return for its fifth season, to air this summer on Esquire Network and NBC. Additionally, Esquire Network will air an array of off-network scripted series, including NBC’s Parks And Recreation and Starz’s Party Down, both starring Adam Scott.
Esquire Network plans to expand on G4’s foundation of games, gear and gadgets. Program categories and genres will feature not only gaming and technology but also entertainment, food, fashion, women, humor, travel, competition, danger and more. Esquire’s unscripted projects in development include Knife Fight, executive produced by Drew Barrymore, Flower Films and Authentic Entertainment. Hosted by Top Chef winner Ilan Hall, Knife Fight is an underground, after-hours cooking competition where talented chefs go head to head in front of a rowdy crowd of celebrities, critics and die-hard foodies. Another original series, The Getaway (working title), is executive produced by Anthony Bourdain and Zero Point Zero and features travel-loving, well-known personalities — people deservedly famous for excellence in their fields — who take viewers to their favorite city on the planet, giving the insiders’ track on their top spots to eat, drink, shop and hang out. “There is a vastly under-served audience in cable TV — today’s modern man — and by joining forces with Esquire, we will deliver a multi-platform experience to this upscale, engaged, passionate audience, one that widens the aperture beyond G4’s technology and gaming base,” Stotsky said. “Esquire magazine brings 80 years of unparalleled insight into what makes men tick, and we will incorporate the best of this iconic brand to produce original shows that build the network for growth and success.”
NBCU decided to go with an upscale makeover for G4 after overtures from the likes of UFC and WWE to take a controlling stake in the channel last year fell through. A deal for G4 would reunite NBCU and Hearst, which were co-owners of A+E Networks until NBCU cashed its stake last July. Hearst’s cable holdings include stakes in A+E’s A&E, Lifetime and History, as well as ESPN. As part of G4′s evolution from a gaming/tech channel (as part of Comcast, it was merged with TechTV in 2004) to a more upscale, sophisticated network, G4 announced in October that it is cancelling long-running series Attack Of The Show! and X-Play.
Rebranding G4 fits into the strategy of NBCU cable maven Bonnie Hammer, who added control of E! and G4 after the Comcast-NBC Universal merger. E! has already changed its look and logo and is undergoing a makeover towards more sophisticated programming, including adding scripted series. Hammer’s first major move at G4 was the hire of former NBC marketing chief Adam Stotsky as general manger in January 2012.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Shorter version of this press release: gay men, women don’t know what to do with a geek channel, will develop a bunch of female-oriented programming instead, making it the nth channel to pursue the elusive “middle aged white woman” demographic.
Wow, you got that completely wrong.
It’s Bravo for men. Period. And don’t get hung up on the magazine. I suspect “silent partner” will pretty much describe their true creative input.
Actually, gay men and women made a lot of valuable contributions at TechTV and G4. I was the head writer of X-Play for two years, a gay man was the head writer of AOTS for its last two years, and many other gay men and women who love video games, nerd culture and technology helped keep the place running. There is gay that isn’t Bravo, and there are gay folks who love Bravo and still lost most of 2005 to World of Warcraft. So, you know, when you’re ridiculing people for screwing up G4, please try to use more specific stereotypes.
Whatever, it’s another name change to pave the road for more reality programming and reruns, to make the channel fit in line with the rest of Basic Cable.
Esquire: a place to watch The Biggest Loser reruns, Bravo TV spinoffs, and reruns of USA shows.
I subscribed to this magazine for a year for only $5. It was not worth it. I don’t understand how this awful magazine has been around for 80 years, and now is getting it’s own channel. But then again, I don’t understand half of what NBCU does.
Esquire has a few good articles (and a few bad ones–see the recent and ridiculous Megan Fox interview). But their “style” gets exhausting–every month there’s a $500 pair of shoes, $5K suit or $10K watch you’re supposed to be buying. Uhhh, sure. And even if I did have that kind of money to throw around, I certainly wouldn’t be watching cable to learn how to spend it (although Esquire probably has a $25K TV to recommend).
This network will never attract a male audience if they are going to give us dumb reality shows. Women watch those, not men.
Has the Esquire customer changed that drastically? I see no relationship between G4 and the upscale male, so why keep ANY previous programming?
Hope they can bring back George Lois to do the graphics….
I am sad to see G4 go, but i havent been able to watch it for years. I am a Directv customer and they dropped G4 for terrible ratings, whihch i didnt really mind.
At the dtime they were dropped they showed marathons of : Cops, Star Trek, and Ninja Warrior. Not gaming television at that point.
They did this to themselves, and i wont watch this show either because it wont be on Directv!
On one hand, this Esquire Channel sounds completely awful. “Epscale males”? I can smell the vinegar already.
On the other hand, it is entirely G4′s fault that they didn’t survive. When your flagship program, X-Play, devolves into a soapbox for abrasive hosts to browbeat the audience with their stupid opinions, you’re in trouble. COPS marathons don’t help. Attack of the Show did its best, but there just wasn’t enough programming for G4 to survive.
Xplay was great BECAUSE of it’s hosts. They gave their opinions and honest reviews. LOL why do you think Sessler got fired? Not a corporate lapdog who supports everything thats why, it something was crap he singled it out and shit on it. They did what more review shows need to – actually be mean, and honest, and slightly abbrasive yes. Just look at Scott from Reviews on the Run, he totally shoots stuff down sometimes but thats how it should be.
fits perfectly with usa and syfy’s old low cpm audiance. bravo (no pun intended). shame. there was something unique about G4 (aside from Cops), this? not so much.
It actually was what G4 was planning to do with themselves for years, they just couldn’t get the geeks to tune out while at the same time, not enough of them were tuning in to make the channel worth their effort as their original programming was being cut back to save more money. It was a self-fulfilling spiral.
This has been coming down the pike. It’s no real loss at this point.
Upscale people don’t spend a lot of time actually watching TV much less realty TV. If these guys have time to watch TV they are watching live sports or sports news not cooking shows.
I read this and, just out of curiosity, changed to the G4 channel. Up until now I had zero idea what it was or who it was for. Right now there is a re-run of “Knight Rider” on and next up will be the “Top 100 Video Games of All Time.” All I’m saying is, anything NBCU does would be an improvement over this crap. Also, who reads Esquire? I didn’t even know it was still being published.
That’s not what this channel WAS. Back in the Tech TV days (before G4 acqui-swallowed it whole) there were shows on PC repair and use, Video Game reviews (now all cancelled) and older anime that Adult Swim wouldn’t air.
After a roulette wheel of management changes, they cancelled all of that and put on a bunch of vapid pop-culture shows (vis a vis: talking about video games literally and talking about gaming culture and geek-chic are not the same thing) and crap to appeal to the lowest common denominator of video game players (programming that Spike TV wouldn’t air.)
When that failed (as TruTV contains far lower-brow Reality TV content than Spike or G4 would acquiesce towards), they didn’t know what to do with the channel space and killed off everything left on the channel until the Esquire deal came through.
I want to hear Bonnie Hammer say she is 100% behind this network and that she is going to allocate the money necessary to make it work. It just seems like a bad idea and a waste of money to me.
Are you KIDDING ME??!! Pathetic idea..
THANK YOU!!!the world needs G4
Original scripted???
Oh, the ol’ TechTV days. Things started going downhill when Comcast merged it with G4.
This new channel just sounds downright terrible. Add it to the growing list of unneeded channels.
thankfully Techtv lives on today as TWIT with tons of tech shows and content you can view on youtube, iOS and android devices, roku, boxee, googletv and more http://wiki.twit.tv/wiki/How_to_Watch_and_Listen_to_TWiT
Exactly. Before the Internet could carry video, and On Demand was in it’s infancy, there was a need for niche programming. Channels based on interests, scripted entertainment sorted into variety channels, and the like.
Now, the Internet can handle niche culture better than TV does, so there’s a lot of Basic Channel space… and not a whole lot to do with it. If anything, the Cable/Satellite providers might do their customers a service to ask big content to pare down their channels, so that signal space can be used to further improve Internet/Voice delivery, or support the upcoming HD2K/Ultra Definition programming coming down the pipeline in the next 3-5 years.
So they’re going to become a high-brow version of Spike. Good luck with that.
“Times have changed in the past 30 years, Tho-mas, we no longer swill sherry and screw goats for fun anymore…” –Jeremy Piven as Droz, PCU.
Esquire – it isn’t that it’s bad per se – the writing is exceptional – it’s that it’s usually irrelevant. They should call it the Metrosexual Channel. Flyover country will roll right past this to an ESPN channel. The magazine hasn’t been a must-read in 40 years; it has nothing to do with the inter-net. It just limps along as the anti-GQ. Sounds like this was timed to their bin Laden-shooter scoop though. Generally speaking there aren’t enough ads, therefore not enough copy/content, to be worth buying. This is true month in and out; homage to an era from a long time ago without attempting to re-invent the spirit and the inventiveness of that era just a re-tread of its style. And why is humor in men’s magazines usually so douche bag terrible? So self-amused and unaware of it.
It’s like all they’re aiming for is a smirk of familiarity or recognition. Actually laughing out loud seems actively discouraged. Lame lists and sidebars aren’t exactly S.J. Perelman.
Some of the big agencies should get involved in re-branding some of these old titles or even starting new ones commensurate to the realities of the new magazine marketplace. Magazines aren’t dead per se, they’ve been knocked unconscious. You build the new “book” and the television franchise simultaneously as a fresh business model. That C.A.A. guy might be good at spearheading an initiative like that. Ads have swelled in comment magazines that don’t hold themselves out as newsweeklies, a new PREMIERE not a bad idea actually as time and irony would have it. Look at the back stories to the Oscar nominations alone – often leading the news not in the “back pages.” Quick hits and links don’t give the requisite depth to these stories.
G4 should rather partner with GQ. Then they could rebrand the network GQ4… Or G4Q…
G4 was a terrible brand with horrible shows.
The problem is that Esquire is almost as bad, just with different connotations. I’d feel like an asshole watching anything associated with a Esquire, despite both Parks and Recreation and Party Down appealing to me.
Ah, Bonnie Hammer ruins yet another network. Yeah
I actually watched AOTS and “Web Soup” on occasion; both were different enough from anything else on the tube to warrant the occasional tune. Unfortunately, one can only watch “Cops” and “Campus PD” so many times.
Poor G4 reminds me of John Nash: brilliant but schizophrenic. Unlike Nash however, G4 could never quite recover from its schizophrenia.
Sounds like Bonnie Hammer was going through Jeff Zucker’s old desk and came across this abomination of an idea. I mean it’s not like they have anything to lose, but Esquire? Seriously?
I actually liked Josh’s idea of joint project with GQ, just froma branding standpoint, but there are at least 10 more relevent and compelling partners I can come up with off the top of my head besides Esquire.
G4 used to be one of my favorite channels, they really did sign their own death note. They just got progressively worse and worse. I can remember days of olde they had kick a** shows. I mean programming that was fresh and really worth my time to watch and they got rid of all those and played really unoriginal sh*t like COPS and Cheaters, man I hated it when Cheaters came on. I’m going to miss the Old G4, who am I kidding I’ve been missing the Old G4.
I have dish satellite network at home and actually watched the original Ninja Warrior faithfully, actually been to Midoriyama, sitting at home the other night surfing the channels and decided that there was nothing on the 150 channels I had searched. With the coming Esquire network there will be even more of “nothing to watch” what a shame, a chance to really do something unique but now it’s just more of the same crap.