New York City will not be able to look at footage and other material from Ken Burns’ The Central Park Five documentary, a federal judge ruled today. U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis ruled in favor of Burns’ Florentine Films’ November 2012 motion to quash the city’s efforts to see outtakes, notes and more from the film. “Florentine has established entitlement to the reporter’s privilege”
said the judge Tuesday in his 15-page order (read it here) “Defendants have failed to overcome the reporter’s privilege by making a showing that the information they seek pertains to a significant issue and is unavailable from alternative sources,” he added. Burns and fellow filmmakers David McMahon and Sarah Burns’ documentary centers on the wrongful conviction of five youths in 1989 for the heavily reported brutal rape of a jogger in the NYC park. Upon their release, the now-grown men filed a $50 million lawsuit against the city. On October 2nd of last year, the City of New York issued subpoenas against Florentine in an effort to see whether there is material or documentation from the making of the film that could exonerate their officials’ handling of the initial case. “While journalistic privilege under the law is very important, we firmly believe it did not apply here. This film is a one-sided advocacy piece that depicts the plaintiffs’ version of events as undisputed fact. It is our view that we should be able to view the complete interviews, not just those portions that the filmmakers chose to include,” said the City Attorney’s office today after the ruling. City lawyers are considering whether to take a new approach to the matter, their office said Tuesday. IFC Films released Central Park Five theatrically on November 23 and on VOD on December 7.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


This case could be as significant as Jacobellis v. Ohio (which established First Amendment protection for motion pictures) depending on whether it makes it to SCOTUS.
“This film is a one-sided advocacy piece that depicts the plaintiffs’ version of events as undisputed fact.”
Uh, that’s because the defendants proved it and the prosecutors did not. Seems the powers-that-be are terrified of a reverse Polanski effect and want to “get out in front” of it by attacking the doc sight-unseen.
Burns is a slimeball about this. If he has material that can lead to better understanding of the case, he’s morally wrong to not allow the city to see it. What’s he got to hide?
You obviously know nothing about the case. We have a very good understanding of what happened. The city railroaded 5 young men, violated their constitutional rights, and threw them in jail with a sloppy investigation to get a “win” in the press. This baseless lawsuit against Ken Burns was just one of many stall tactics they’ve used over the years to prevent the Central Park Five from getting justice.