A coalition of copyright owners and Internet Service Providers including Comcast, AT&T, Cablevision, Time Warner Cable, and Verizon will begin issuing notices to illegal downloaders this week as part of the newly launched Copyright Alert System (CAS), it was announced Monday. The initiative, introduced last year by the Center For Copyright Information, will target consumers suspected of pirating or sharing copyrighted movies, TV shows, and music. Content owners will work with ISPs to send a series of six escalating warnings to users
suspected of copyright violation. After receiving two “educational” Copyright Alerts, alleged violators will be sent two additional alerts requiring a response, followed by two final Alerts accompanied by a reduction of Internet speed and/or forced redirection to a landing page requiring further action. “We hope this cooperative, multi-stakeholder approach will serve as a model for addressing important issues facing all who participate in the digital entertainment ecosystem”, CCI Director Jill Lesser said today in a statement.


People around the globe are file sharing; 25 million and counting everyday. It’s too late. Time for the old folks at these companies to wake up….
Wake up and just LET their work be stolen?
What a smart move, I really do believe that this we need to focus on the severity of this crime that is piracy. People don’t understand how serious it really is and how many people are hurt by STEALING. We hear a lot about burglaries and rapes, where things are taken, and it just seems like no one talks about piracy on the same level, when it is.
I would personally prefer harsher penalties and less warnings. Really, 6 warnings? 2 is enough. But this is a start, and a good one too.
OK, I agree that piracy is a problem, but on the same level as rape? That is a delusional statement if I’ve ever seen one. Piracy is very bad, but it is not as heinous an offense as rape is and if you really think that, you need to get your priorities checked.
… will target consumers suspected of pirating or sharing copyrighted movies, TV shows, and music.
Anyone else see anything wrong with this?
Expecting a flood of people who oppose this for some insanely convoluted reason.
It’s better die standing, than live on your knees. All hail the Hydra.
I look forward to reading here about the volumes of lawsuits, class action and individual, regarding false accusations, damages from undeserved disciplinary actions (i.e. reducing internet speed), data discrepancies and inaccuracies, etc.
I hope (well, actually, I don’t even care) this conglomerate has a lot of insurance coverage.
Automated systems have already found live sound of a large piece of equipment (historic railroad equipment) which blows a horn, and then rings a bell to be in violation of someone’s music copyright. (Got paid to shoot the thing at a festival)– You Tube required 2 runs through their dispute system to put that away.. Would that result in lowering speed here?
At least two law firms are already prepping for a class action lawsuit of epic proportions.
Dumbasses.
Sorry Ed, it’s not to late. It’s just the beginning! They control the net, you will soon see!
This ought to be the end of YouTube. Good riddance.
This sounds to me like they’re just wagging their fingers at violators and saying “naughty, naughty, naughty.” I fail to see how this will change anything. It’s like just telling a schoolyard bully to “be nice.” If you just give them a slap on the wrist and expect them to stop, you’re nuts. This bill is useless; if people are knowingly downloading stuff illegally, they’re not gonna care that someone just told them to stop. They’re not going to stop unless punished.