Pay TV subscribers who don’t watch sports likely will have to cut the cord if they want to escape the rocketing costs for programming rights and new channels. At least that’s one of the conclusions I take away from RBC Capital Markets’ David Bank’s smart, 91-page report this morning about the state of sports media. He notes that programmers have a powerful incentive to engage in an arms race for sports: The rewards for airing games — from rising ad sales and pay TV affiliate fees — still outweigh the rising amounts that football, baseball, and other sports rights holders are charging. As a result, channels offering sports “should be able to expand [profit] margins,” Bank says. Won’t that lead to a war with distributors such as DirecTV and Time Warner Cable, who say that subscribers will bolt if monthly bills continue to rise? Not necessarily, because their hands aren’t clean. “How can these distributors complain about unfair pricing when they are in turn asking for the same kind of pricing on the same kind of content?” Bank asks. DirecTV owns three major regional sports networks (ROOT Sports in Pittsburgh, Rocky Mountain states, and the Northwest) while Time Warner Cable has a new channel for the Los Angeles Lakers. Bank acknowledges that “we must ask ourselves whether the [growing number of regional sports networks] risk damaging the ecosystem.”
Still, Bank’s a fan of News Corp‘s unannounced, but widely expected, plan to convert Speed into a national multi-sports network likely to be called Fox Sports 1. It would be a financial success, he says, if Rupert Murdoch’s company can raise the pay TV fee to $1 per subscriber per month from Speed’s current 22 cents, and increase distribution to 90M homes from 81.4M. Although it won’t initially threaten Disney’s ESPN, “Fox has succeeded as the insurgent in two other significant cases: broadcast (with the launch of Fox in the mid-80s) and cable news (with the launch of Fox News Channel in the mid-90s).”
One of Bank’s most interesting charts shows that sports services account for nine of the 10 most expensive pay TV channels if you compare the amount operators pay for each viewer the network attracts. ESPN is No. 1 at $500 per viewer per month. It’s followed by NFL Network ($424), MLB Network ($307), Fox Soccer ($265), Current ($259), FUEL TV ($257), NBA TV ($247), Golf Channel ($251), ESPN2 ($229), and NBC Sports Network ($238).


Cut the cord long ago so this doesent effect me in the slightest. What I’d like to see is the realization of “cable a la carte”.
Then we would see the s**t hit the fan…
Apple, want to see your stock rise again to unparelled heights?
Get on it!
Way ahead of ya, cord long since cut. It’s been easy to see where all this is going for a while now…
Already cut the cord. Best decision ever!
Between Netflix and Hulu, I haven’t missed anything.
That extra $100 in my pocket each month sure is great.
Ditto. Going on a year now with cord cut!
A tip: invest in the restaurant business, as sports fans will get sick of shelling out these outrageous cable fees and just say screw it and go down to the local sports bar to watch the game with friends and better food.
Same here…cut the cord almost two years ago and really haven’t missed it.
A la carte won’t work because instead of paying $5 for ESPN, you’d have to pay something like $20 to make up for the shortfall in sub fees that ESPN would’ve gotten. Similar situation for all other networks.
Posted the original comment above.
Take a tip and invest in your local college DVD library there you can catch up on all of the hottest series like Mad Men, Downton Abbey and TONS of others- FREE! You may have to wait a bit for the latest season of Boardwalk Empire, but so what? It’s that much sweeter without commercial breaks and promos in every corner of the screen.
Cable? I can wait until the day of “a la carte”. Til then, screw off. I’ll save that $100 bucks a month!
What’ll really accelerate the trend of cord-cutting would be broadcast stations and networks redoubling efforts to compete with regional and national sports networks, willing to take massive short-term losses to kill off cable in the long term – I personally think sports is the only thing keeping cable as we know it alive. Unfortunately, the new college football playoff is going to stay on cable for another twelve years, and Monday Night Football is locked up until at least 2021, so don’t look for broadcast to mount a serious challenge to cable – on the national stage, at least.
Mark your calendars for 2014 – that’s the year MyNetworkTV is currently slated to run until. That “network” doesn’t even claim to be a network outside the name anymore – it just distributes syndicated programming in primetime and lets would-be independent stations who don’t want to create an actual brand for themselves simply slap a “my” in front of their channel number or area of service. Surely those stations must realize that live sports is infinitely better at getting eyes on their stations than generic independent programming.
Oh wait, broadcast stations are themselves owned by huge conglomerates who have turned stations into different combinations of the same syndicated programming with zero local variation outside local news and make as much money off of cable as anyone thanks to “retransmission consent” (also known as “charging cable companies to carry the stations they have to carry anyway”) and MyNetworkTV itself as well as its stations in the largest markets are owned by Fox, who just so happens to be the largest owner of regional sports networks and so has negative interest in killing that golden goose. Plus teams have gotten into the act of owning their own RSNs, which broadcast stations pretty much can’t compete with, and would much rather not have to go through the hassle of finding affiliates to syndicate games to in outlying markets. Guess this isn’t going to happen unless and until the FCC imposes a la carte.
(Maybe look to the CW folding? Well, TimeWarner doesn’t own any stations but has the most interest in the CW continuing, while CBS owns CBS Sports Network, the network in perhaps the most fragile position of any of the waves of ESPN knockoffs springing up in recent years. Tribune owns the CW affiliates in the largest markets and knows the value of sports to WGN in Chicago, and recently came out of bankruptcy so they might have some fresh eyes looking at their business, so they might be the best hope, but I doubt they want to break up in any way the independent slate that’s worked for WGN for decades.)
Cut the cord back in 2008 and I’ve never looked back thanks to my over-the-air antenna, hulu+ and netflix. I also know more and more people who are cutting the cord. Now I laugh every time I hear someone complain about the cost of cable/satellite going up again. The sports networks are running on a bubble and it will burst someday.