Isabelle Coutant-Peyre, the lawyer investigating possible litigation over Argo’s portrayal of Iran, tells me she is weighing options on how to proceed and is considering bringing suit in France, Switzerland or the U.S.
The French attorney traveled to Tehran last week at the “urgent” request of the culture minister and speaking by phone today, she called Argo “the cherry on top” of a string of movies that Iranian officials consider an affront to their nation and people. Authorities, she said, are concerned historical facts and the way in which Iranians are depicted are distortions and want “to be able to give their point of view so that they are not seen as mad men.”
Argo is based on the story of how the CIA and Hollywood orchestrated the escape of six Americans from Iran in 1979, but when I asked if it was understood by officials that the Ben Affleck-directed film is a fictionalized account, Coutant-Peyre countered, “It claims to be a sort of documentary…
In the beginning of the film it says it is taken from declassified documents.” She called it a “report” on an event “which is distorted in the film.” She further said it was part of what is considered a “strategy of strong pressure from the American government” which was made clear “via Mrs. Obama” when she announced Argo‘s Best Picture Oscar win on February 24. When I suggested that the names of Academy Award winners are kept secret until the envelopes are opened on Oscar night, Coutant-Peyre responded, “You think they didn’t know? That’s not true. The president knew.”
No lawsuit is immediately forthcoming, however. “There are administrative questions and I’m waiting on complementary documents to show what has been falsified in the film,” Coutant-Peyre said. She also explained that Iran is about to enter its two-week New Year period of Nowruz, delaying any action. Were she to bring a claim in France, she estimates she would sue the distributor, Warner Bros; in Switzerland, the claim could be for defamation of a foreign state; and in the U.S. she said she would consider suing Argo’s producers, but she would have to line up an American co-counsel. (LA-based entertainment lawyer Alex Weingarten recently told Deadline if the suit were filed in California, it would be subject to a special motion to strike brought under the anti-SLAPP statute and subject to First Amendment protection.) Coutant-Peyre said she would not ask for a ban of Argo but she might seek a disclaimer at the start of the movie that “the Republic of Iran contests what is in the film.” She told me she has not yet contacted Affleck, the producers or Warner Bros., saying she expects to be in touch “before we would sit down in a court room.”

The culture minister of Iran and Coutant-Peyre should probably consider how the statements made by Ahmadinejad (the Country’s leader) portray the country
At this moment in time, compel WB will give all the profits from its films so far this year to Iran as a settlement. Be careful, Iran, you may end up owing WB money….
LOL
This is a joke, right? Should we be worried about Germany suing Spielberg for making Germans look bad in Schindler’s List?
We can only wonder at how the US is portrayed in Iranian media. Maybe there’s a counter-suit to be filed by the DoJ?
This is hilarious. The article doesn’t mention who exactly would be sued. Warners? The US? Michelle Obama?!? The quote, “You think they didn’t know? That’s not true. The president knew,” sounds like a 15 year old conspiracy theorist posting on Facebook. I also don’t understand how Iran could possibly try to defend their actions. Regardless of how it is portrayed in Argo, the fact is the American consulate was raided. Iran held Americans prisoner on our own soil. If anyone but Carter was president, we’d have an entirely different movie because most presidents would have/should have taken that action as an act of war.
This woman’s a nutcase. What has the French government said about this; anyone check her citizenship papers? Was she born in Iran? etc.?
It’s sickening to me that Iran is making such a big song and dance about this when one of their most internationally renowned film makers is currently banned from making films, giving interviews and is under house arrest. Do they Actually want to control the entire film industry?
This story is hilarious and wonderful, with the culturally clueless and humor-free Iranians planning to sue Hollywood over hurt feelings about how they were portrayed in the film. In fact, this whole notion is so Argo-like in its conflation of the real and ridiculous that nobody but the Iranians themselves could have made it up.
I wonder what their primary complaint actually will be with the movie – I’ll bet it’s actually about their TSA guys being made to look like doofs at the end before they fly out of the country. It’ll be something about how Iran knew but chose to let those people go.
A pathetic and farcical attack on freedom of expression. But unfortunately that is what the international court system has degenerated into. So blame Iran most definitely, but also blame the myopia or malice that characterizes the international court system. These type of malicious lawsuits characterize that system all too frequently. It’s Orwellian.
Agreed, this is why it’s essential that the USA never ever join the ICC. We would just be setting ourselves up for incessant poltically motivated legal attacks on our people.
The entire Iranian government, and their whack-job “attorney”, need to get a life.
Iran is worried parts of a fictional movie were made up, yet continue to deny the Holocaust ever happened. Got it. They really don’t let facts stand in the way of anything, huh?
“Argo sued”: all this stuff would be the perfect sequel for Ben Affleck
I can’t decide whether this sounds like the premise to a Sasha Baron Cohen movie, or a MOUSE THAT ROARED-esque “traditional” farce, or (merely) an ONION headline.