Traditional TV programmers should feel uneasy about some of the findings out today from consulting firm Deloitte’s seventh annual State Of The Media Democracy study. Only 64% of U.S. consumers ranked TV watching as one of their three favorite media activities, down from 69% in 2011 and 71% in 2010, the firm found in a November online survey of 2,129 people. Just 40% of 14-to-23-year-olds put TV among the Top Three. About 51% of TV viewers have connected their sets to the Internet — and another 16% have the equipment to do so. And there’s a sharp increase in the number of people who frequently watch shows on platforms where ratings aren’t measured, or where ads can be avoided. Some 21% (up from 11% in 2011) watch free online video services while 14% (vs. 9%) watch discs of previous seasons and 13% (vs. 4%) watch on a smartphone or mobile device. The number of people viewing shows from an online peer-to-peer network was up to 8% from 3% in 2011, and includes 16% of Millennials. Viewers also are distracted: Just 19% said that they always or almost always just watch TV when they tune in. But 27% said that they browse and surf the Web, 26% read email, and 23% either send text messages or use a social network. Here, too, the numbers are much higher among viewers under 30. The changing behavior “impacts both the entertainment and advertising industries, and highlights the continued importance of using multiple platforms and devices to build brands and engage consumers,” says Deloitte Consulting Director Alma Derricks.


The coming demographic changes will not only turn politics upside down but will also do the same to media. Welcome to the future where you have to keep innovating to win and forcing legacy systems on people by chucking money at lobbyists and politicians will be less and less effective.
Tv programmers have been actively driving away viewers. The internet is not the cause. The internet just gave viewers a place to go.
How much do tv viewers have to keep telling them that they want to watch traditional tv but are being driven off by crazy scheduling, bad shows, trash reality shows, and shortened seasons.
I don’t agree that shortened seasons are a part of the problem. If they were, cable shows wouldn’t be showing such growth.
I do agree that people want quality, stable schedules, fewer commercial interruptions, less trigger happy cancellations and reassurances that they won’t be burned by shows that don’t wrap storylines up and end on cliffhangers.
But some of the most popular shows on TV only air 10 to 16 episodes a year though.
Those cable shows are popular relative to cable standards not by traditional network standards, although a couple of cable shows are edging closer in ratings.
Most people are turned off by the mini-seasons on cable and won’t watch because of it. It’s absurd to have 8-12 episodes of something and then it disappears for a year or so.
Social media should be used to support a tv-show and *not the other way around*. But that’s what many a show/channel is doing. Totally counterproductive. (and here comes the chicken and the egg…)
Wat do some of the shows do? They actively send their viewers away to Twitter DURING the show and/or during the commercial break. That’s just insane and the advertisers should seriously consider calling them out on it.
What are Nielsen ratings good for if the viewers don’t pay any attention to commercials b/c they’re too busy hanging out on Twitter during the break?
You rally your viewers on Twitter BEFORE the show starts and you can send them there afterwards to discuss the show and buy music featured in the episode. “Most tweeted about show” also doesn’t mean squat if the tweets are posted while the show is airing.
Most tweeted anything doesn’t mean squat – tweets and twitter accounts can be faked.
We have not turned on our
TV to watch network/cable programming for almost a year now. We still have cable because Comcast penalizes you if you only want high speed broadband. It is less money to keep the cable and just not watch it.
We all watch programs on Netflix, and from “other” sources.
I just bought a TV where we can just turn it on to Amazon Prime and Netflix, which we have. Or we watch our computers in our rooms.
I would say we are more the norm, than the exception these days. I hate ads, and I love watching what I want, when I want it, ad free.
It has been wonderful.
But Levi, the bottom line is Comcast still gets your money. How is that wonderful?
I agree. Lucky for me it’s cheaper to not have basic cable. Anything I want to watch, I watch online. The only exception is live broadcasts like awards shows or sports. I also have Netflix on my TV and am blissfully unaware of what’s even on network TV most of the time. There are many MANY advantages to watching online or via Netflix (ex. No Commercials!) Plus, 90% of broadcast programming pales next to the best of cable scripted shows anyway.
How does Comcast penalize you if you downgrade? Unless you have a crazy early termination/downgrade fee, you’re still paying more money by having a product you don’t need. The marginal cost to you of having cable may be less by having the bundle, but it makes zero sense that you’d be paying more by canceling cable and sticking to Internet-only.
And shame on you for harming content producers. The business models the industry operates under may be flawed, but that doesn’t excuse piracy.